MR-guided biopsies of lesions in the retroperitoneal space: Technique and results

European Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 307-312

  Zangos, S ^a   Eichler, K ^a   Wetter, A ^a   Lehnert, T ^a   Hammerstingl, R ^a   Diebold, T ^a   Reichel, P ^a   Herzog, C ^a   Hansmann, M L ^a   Mack, M G ^a   Vogl, T J ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

MRI guided biopsy; Retroperitoneal space; Tumorbiopsy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA FLOW; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KIDNEY TUMOR; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PANCREAS TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPERITONEAL TUMOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR BIOPSY; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFACTS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LYMPHOMA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROFIBROMA; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS; RETROPERITONEAL NEOPLASMS; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 31444456822     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2870-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bellin MF, Roy C, Kinkel K et al (1998) Lymph node metastases: Safety and effectiveness of MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles-initial clinical experience. Radiology 207:799-808
2. Hopper K (1995) Percutaneous, radiographically guided biopsy: A history. Radiology 196:329-333
3. Sheafor DH, Paulson EK, Simmons CM, DeLong DM, Nelson RC (1998) Abdominal percutaneous interventional procedures: Comparison of CT and US guidance. Radiology 207:705-710
4. Schulz T, Puccini S, Schneider J, Kahn T (2004) Interventional and intraoperative MR: Review and update of techniques and clinical experience. Eur Radiol 14:2212-2227
5. Zangos S, Kiefl D, Eichler K, Engelmann K, Heller M, Herzog C, Mack MG, Jacobi V, Vogl TJ (2003) MR-guided biopsies of undetermined liver lesions: Technique and results. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 175:688-694
6. Sofocleous C, Schubert J, Brown K, Brody L, Covey A, Getrajdman G (2004) CT-guided transvenous or transcaval needle biopsy of pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1099-1104
7. Wutke R, Schmid A, Fellner F, Horbach T, Kastl S, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Bautz W (2001) CT-guided percutaneous core biopsy: effective accuracy, diagnostic utility and effective costs. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173:1025-1033
8. Harisinghani MG, Saini S, Weissleder R, Hahn PF, Yantiss RK, Tempany C, Wood BJ, Mueller PR (1999) MR lymphangiography using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide in patients with primary abdominal and pelvic malignancies: Radiographic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:1347-1351
9. Matalon TA, Silver B (1990) US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology 174:43-47
10. Charboneau JW, Reading CC, Welch TJ (1990) CT and sonographically guided needle biopsy: Current techniques and new innovations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:1-10
11. Dupuy DE, Rosenberg AE, Punyaratabandhu T, Tan MH, Mankin HJ (1998) Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:759-762
12. Zangos S, Eichler K, Engelmann K et al (2004) MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: Technique and preliminary results. Eur Radiol 15:174-182
13. Adam G, Bucker A, Nolte-Ernsting C, Tacke J, Gunther RW (1999) Interventional MR imaging: Percutaneous abdominal and skeletal biopsies and drainages of the abdomen. Eur Radiol 9:1471-1478
14. Carlson SK, Bender CE, Classic KL, Zink FE, Quam JP, Ward EM, Oberg AL (2001) Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology 219:515-520
15. Arellano R, Boland G, Mueller P (2000) Adrenal biopsy in a patient with lung cancer: Imaging algorithm and biopsy indications, technique, and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1613-1617
16. Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Wang SS (1999) Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT fluoroscopy guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:637-644
17. Froelich JJ, Ishaque N, Saar B, Regn J, Walthers EM, Mauermann F, Klose KJ (1999) Control of percutaneous biopsy with CT fluoroscopy. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 170:191-197
18. Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF (1999) CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: Techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology 212:673-681
19. Nawfel R, Judy P, Silverman S, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams D (2000) Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology 216:180-184
20. Lufkin RB, Gronemeyer DH, Seibel RM (1997) Interventional MRI: Update. Eur Radiol 7:187-200
21. Konig CW, Pereira PL, Trubenbach J, Fritz J, Duda SH, Schick F, Claussen CD (2003) MR imaging-guided adrenal biopsy using an open low-field-strength scanner and MR fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1567-1570
22. Schweiger GD, Yip VY, Brown BP (2000) CT fluoroscopic guidance for percutaneous needle placement into abdominopelvic lesions with difficult access routes. Abdom Imaging 25:633-637
23. Frahm C, Gehl HB, Melchert UH, Weiss HD (1996) Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 19:335-340
24. Ladd ME, Erhart P, Debatin JF, Romanowski BJ, Boesiger P, McKinnon GC (1996) Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 36:646-651
25. Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR, Petersilge CA, Chao CP, Haaga JR (1996) Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: Effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1337-1345
26. Alanen J, Keski-Nisula L, Blanco-Sequeiros R, Tervonen O (2004) Cost comparison analysis of low-field (0.23 T) MRI- and CT-guided bone biopsies. Eur Radiol 14:123-128
27. Langen HJ, Kugel H, Ortmann M, Noack M, de Rochemont RM, Landwehr P (2001) Functional capacity of MRI-compatible biopsy needles in comparison with ferromagnetic biopsy needles. In vitro studies. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173:658-662
28. Sklair-Levy M, Lebensart P, Applbaum Y et al (2001) Percutaneous image-guided needle biopsy in children-summary of our experience with 57 children. Pediatr Radiol 31:732-736
29. Hussain H, Kingston J, Domizio P, Norton A, Reznek R (2001) Imaging-guided core biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant tumors in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:43-47
30. Hoffer F (2005) Interventional radiology in pediatric oncology. Eur J Radiol 53:3-13
31. Hohenberger W, Kastl S (2000) Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy of ductal pancreatic carcinoma. Zentralbl Chir 125:348-355
32. Demharter J, Muller P, Wagner T, Schlimok G, Haude K, Bohndorf K (2001) Percutaneous core-needle biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes in the diagnosis and subclassification of malignant lymphomas. Eur Radiol 11:276-283
33. Ghaye B, Dondelinger RF, Dewe W (1999) Percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy: Sequential versus spiral scanning. A randomized prospective study. Eur Radiol 9:1317-1320