The relationship between intraspecific assortative mating and reproductive isolation between divergent populations

Current Zoology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 484-492

  Bolnick, Daniel I ^a   Kirkpatrick, Mark ^b  

^a HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Hybridization; Mating preference; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876423911     PISSN: 16745507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/58.3.484     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arnqvist G, Rowe L, Krupa JJ, Sih A, 1996. Assortative mating by size: A meta-analysis of mating patterns in water striders. Evolutionary Ecology 10:265-284.
2. Bank C, Hermisson J, Kirkpatrick M, 2012. Can reinforcement complete speciation? Evolution (in press).
3. Bernstein R, Bernstein S, 2003. Assortative mating in insects: Sexual selection vs. sampling artifact. Western North American Naturalist 63:374-381.
4. Boag PT, 1983. The heritability of external morphology in Darwin's ground finches Geospiza on Isla Daphne Major, Galapagos. Evolution 37:877-894.
5. Boag PT, Grant PR, 1978. Heritability of external morphology in Darwin's finches. Nature 274:793-794.
6. Boughman JW, 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411:944-948.
7. Bürger R, Schneider KA, Willensdorfer M, 2006. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 60:2185-2206.
8. Candolin U, 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews 78:575-595.
9. Cézilly F, 2004. Assortative mating. Encyclopedia of Aminal Behavior 3:876-881.
10. Coyne JA, Orr HA, 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Press.
11. Day T, Pritchard J, Schluter D, 1994. A comparison of two sticklebacks. Evolution 48:1723-1734.
12. de Cara MAR, Barton NH, Kirkpatrick M, 2008. A model for the evolution of assortative mating. American Naturalist 171:580-596.
13. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M, 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
14. Eizaguirre C, Lenz TL, Sommerfeld RD, Harrod C, Kalbe M et al., 2010. Parasite diversity, patterns of MHC ii variation and olfactory based mate choice in diverging three-spined stickleback ecotypes. Evolutionary Ecology 25:605-622.
15. Gavrilets S, 2003. Models of speciation: What have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 57:2197-2215.
16. Gavrilets S, 2004. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Grant PR, 1986. Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Grant PR, Abbott I, Schluter D, Curry RL, Abbott LK, 1985. Variation in the size and shape of Darwin's finches. Biological Journal of The Linnean Society 25:1-39.
19. Hall DW, Kirkpatrick M, West B, 2000. Runaway sexual selection when female preferences are directly selected. Evolution 541862-1869.
20. Hankison SJ, Morris MR, 2003. Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: Female swortail fish assess multiple species-specific cues. Behavioral Ecology 14:282-287.
21. Hohenlohe PA, Arnold SJ, 2010. Dimensionality of mate choice, sexual isolation, and speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:16583-16588.
22. Hoskin CJ, Higgie M, McDonald KR, Moritz C, 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437:1353-1356.
23. Huber SK, De Leon LF, Hendry AP, Bermingham E, Podos J, 2007. Reproductive isolation between sympatric morphs in a bimodal population of Darwin's finches. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274:1709-1714.
24. Jiang Y, Bolnick DI, Kirkpatrick M, in revision. Widespread positive assortative mating within animal populations.
25. Johnston RF, Johnson SG, 1989. Nonrandom mating in feral pigeons. The Condor 91:23-29.
26. Jones FC, Brown C, Pemberton JM, Braithwaite VA, 2006. Reproductive isolation in a threespine stickleback hybrid zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:1531-1544.
27. Kirkpatrick M, 2001. Reinforcement during ecological speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Section B 268:1259-1263.
28. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigne V, 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: Models and experiments. American Naturalist 159:S22-S35.
29. Kozak GM, Reisland M, Boughmann JW, 2009. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice. Evolution 63:353-365.
30. Lande R, 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 78:3721-3725.
31. Matthews B, Marchinko KB, Bolnick DI, Mazumder A, 2010. Specialization of trophic position and habitat use by sticklebacks in an adaptive radiation. Ecology 91:1025-1034.
32. McKinnon JS, Mori S, Blackman BK, David L, Kingsley DM et al., 2004. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 429:294-298.
33. Milinski M, 2003. The function of mate choice in sticklebacks: Optimizing MHC genetics. Journal of Fish Biology 63 (Supplement A):1-16.
34. Milinski M, Bakker TCM, 1990. Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344:330-333.
35. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Counterman BA, Noor MAF, 2004. The genetics of speciation by reinforcement. PLoS Biology 2:2256-2263.
36. Podos J, 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature (London) 409:185-188.
37. Pryke SR, Griffth SC, 2007. The relative role of male vs. female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:1512- 1521.
38. R Development Core Team, 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
39. Rafferty NE, Boughman JW, 2006. Olfactory mate recognition in a sympatric species pair of three-spined sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology 17:965-970.
40. Rundle HD, 2002. A test of ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 56: 322-329.
41. Rundle HD, Nagel L, Boughman JW, Schluter D, 2000. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287:306-308.
42. Rundle HD, Schluter D, 1998. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: Sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52: 200-208.
43. Ryan MJ, Rand AS, 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
44. Schluter D, McPhail JD, 1992. Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks. American Naturalist 140: 85-108.
45. Servedio MR, Kirkpatrick M, 1997. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51:1764-1772.
46. Servedio MR, Noor MAF, 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: Theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34:339-364.
47. Snowberg L, Bolnick DI, 2008. Assortative mating by diet in a phenotypically unimodal but ecologically variable population of stickleback. American Naturalist 172:733-739.
48. Snowberg LK, Bolnick DI, In review. Disentangling spatial segregation and assortative mating in threespine stickleback. Evolution.
49. Vines TH, Schluter D, 2006. Strong assortative mating between allopatric sticklebacks as a by-product of adaptation to different environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 273:911-916.
50. Wright S, 1921. Systems of mating. III. Assortative mating based on somatic resemblance. Genetics 6:144-161.