Response inhibition modulates response conflict in task switching

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

Volumn 221, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 33-40

  Grzyb, Kai Robin ^a   Hübner, Ronald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Response conflict; Response inhibition; Response repetition; Task switching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876398830     PISSN: 21908370     EISSN: 21512604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000128     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Altmann, E. M. (2011). Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37, 935-951. doi: 10.1037/a0022931
2. Cooper, S., & Marí-Beffa, P. (2008). The role of response repetition in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1198-1211.
3. Druey, M. D., & Hübner, R. (2008). Response inhibition under task switching: Its strength depends on the amount of taskirrelevant response activation. Psychological Research, 72, 515-527.
4. Grzyb, K. R., & Hübner, R. (2012a). Excessive responserepetition costs under task switching: How response inhibition amplifies response conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0028477
5. Grzyb, K. R., & Hübner, R. (2012b). Response-repetition costs in task switching: How they are modulated by previous-trial response-category activation. Acta Psychologica, 139, 97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.10.006
6. Grzyb, K. R., & Hübner, R. (2012c). Strategic modulation of response inhibition in task switching. Manuscript in preparation.
7. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
8. Hübner, R., & Druey, M. D. (2006). Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for responserelated repetition effects under task shifting? Psychological Research, 70, 245-261.
9. Juvina, I., & Taatgen, N. A. (2009). A repetition-suppression account of between-trial effects in a modified Stroop paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 131, 72-84. doi: 10.1016/ j.actpsy.2009.03.002
10. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching - a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-874.
11. Kleinsorge, T. (1999). Response repetition benefits and costs. Acta Psychologica, 103, 295-310.
12. Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300-312.
13. Koch, I., Schuch, S., Vu,K. P.,&Proctor,R. W. (2011). Responserepetition effects in task switching: Dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability. Acta Psychologica, 136, 399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.006
14. Marí-Beffa, P., Cooper, S., & Houghton, G. (2012). Unmixing the mixing cost: Contributions from dimensional relevance and stimulus-response suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance, 38, 478- 488. doi: 10.1037/a0025979
15. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaption effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
16. Meiran, N. (2000a). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
17. Meiran, N. (2000b). Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task-sets during task-switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performanceXVIII (pp. 377-399).Cambridge,MA:MITPress.
18. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 33-48.
19. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
20. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and responseresponse compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566-582.
21. Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2007). Automatic activation of task-related representations in task shifting. Memory & Cognition, 35, 138-155.
22. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 34-80.