A place-based approach to conservation management using public participation GIS (PPGIS)

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 455-473

  Brown, Greg ^a   Weber, Delene ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

conservation; participatory GIS; place; place based management; PPGIS

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; GIS; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; TOP-DOWN APPROACH;

NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 84876331447     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.685628     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alessa, N., Kliskey, A. and Brown, G. 2008. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and urban planning, 85 (1): 27-39.
2. Babbie, E. 2008. The basics of social research, Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
3. Beverly, J. 2008. Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: an internet-based participatory mapping approach. Canadian journal of forest research, 38 (2): 289-303.
4. Bricker, K. S. and Kerstetter, D. L. 2000. Level of specialization and place attachment: an exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure sciences, 22 (4): 233-257.
5. Brown, G. 2003. A method for assessing highway qualities to integrate values in highway planning. Journal of transport geography, 11 (4): 271-283.
6. Brown, G. 2005. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications. Society & natural resources, 18 (1): 1-23.
7. Brown, G. 2006. Mapping landscape values and development preferences: a method for tourism and residential development planning. International journal of tourism research, 8 (2): 101-113.
8. Brown, G. 2008. A theory of urban park geography. Journal of leisure research, 40 (4): 589-607.
9. Brown, G. and Alessa, L. 2005. A GIS-based inductive study of wilderness values. International journal of wilderness, 11 (1): 14-18.
10. Brown, G. and Pullar, D. 2012. An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International journal of geographical information science, 26 (2): 231-246.
11. Brown, G. and Reed, P. 2000. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest science, 46 (2): 240-247.
12. Brown, G. and Reed, P. 2009. Public participation GIS: a new method for national forest planning. Forest science, 55 (2): 166-182.
13. Brown, G. and Raymond, C. 2007. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment. Applied geography, 27 (2): 89-111.
14. Brown, G. and Weber, D. 2011. Public participation GIS: a new method for use in national park planning. Landscape and urban planning, 102 (1): 1-15.
15. Brown, G. and Weber, D. Using public participation GIS (PPGIS) on the Geoweb to monitor tourism development preferences. Journal of sustainable tourism, forthcoming
16. Brown, G., Montag, J. and Lyon, K. 2012. Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Society & natural resources, 25 (7): 633-651.
17. Brown, G. 2004. A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Applied geography, 24 (2): 161-180.
18. Carver, S. 2001. Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and planning B: planning and design, 28: 907-921.
19. Clement, J. and Cheng, A. 2010. Using analyses of public value orientations, attitudes and preferences to inform national forest planning in Colorado and Wyoming. Applied geography, 31 (2): 393-400.
20. Davenport, M. A. and Anderson, D. H. 2005. Getting from sense of place to place-based management: an interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society and natural resources, 18 (7): 625-641.
21. Department of Conservation. 2009. Draft Stewart Island / Rakiura Conservation Management Strategy and Draft Rakiura National Park Management Plan[online] Available from: http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/getting-involved/consultations/closed-consultations/rakiura-summary-of-submissions.pdf [Accessed 12 November 2011]
22. Department of Conservation. 2011. Outcomes at places[online] Available from: http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/about-doc/role/policies-and-plans/cms/cms-outcomes-at-places.pdf [Accessed 12 November 2011]
23. Dunn, C. E. 2007. Participatory GIS-a people's GIS?. Progress in human geography, 31 (5): 616-637.
24. Fagerholm, N. and Käyhkö, N. 2009. Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia, 187 (1): 43-60.
25. Frumkin, H. 2003. Healthy places: exploring the evidence. American journal of public health, 93 (9): 1451-1456.
26. Jorgensen, B. S. and Stedman, R. C. 2001. Sense of place as an attitude: lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of environmental psychology, 21 (3): 233-248.
27. Kingston, R. 2007. Public participation in local policy decision-making: the role of web-based mapping. Cartographic journal, 44 (2): 138-144.
28. Lackey, R. T. 1998. Seven pillars of ecosystem management. Landscape and urban planning, 40 (1): 21-30.
29. LINZ, (Land Information New Zealand). 2012. New Zealand gazetteer of official names[online] Available from: http://www.linz.govt.nz/placenames/find-names/nz-gazetteer-official-names/index.aspx [Accessed 28 March 2012]
30. McIntyre, N., Moore, J. and Yuan, M. 2008. A place-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands. Society & natural resources, 21 (8): 657-670.
31. McLeod, K. L. 2005. Scientific consensus statement on marine ecosystem-based management. Communication Partnership for Science and the Sea (COMPASS), [online] Available at: http://www.marineplanning.org/pdf/Consensusstatement.pdf [Accessed 12 November 2011]
32. Nielsen-Pincus, M. 2011. Mapping a values typology in three counties of the interior northwest, USA: scale, geographic associations among values, and the use of intensity weights. Society & natural resources, 24 (6): 535-552.
33. Olson, E. 2011. Place-based management at different spatial scales. Journal of coastal conservation, 15: 257-269.
34. Pocewicz, A., Schnitzer, R. and Nielsen-Pincus, M. 2010. The social geography of southern Wyoming: important places, development, and natural resource management, Lander, WY: The Nature Conservancy. [online] Available from: http://www.nature.org/wyoscience [Accessed 12 November 2011]
35. Pocewicz, A. 2012. An evaluation of internet versus paper-based methods for public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS). Transactions in GIS, 16 (1): 39-53.
36. Rambaldi, G. 2006. Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. EJISDC, 25: 1 [online] Available from: http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs/include/getdoc.php?id=246&article=263&mode=pdf [Accessed 12 November 2011]
37. Raymond, C. and Brown, G. 2010. Assessing spatial associations between perceptions of landscape value and climate change risk for use in climate change planning. Climatic change, 104 (3): 653-678.
38. Sawicki, D. and Peterman, D. 2002. " Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States ". In Community participation and geographic information systems, Edited by: Craig, W., Harris, T. and Weiner, D. 17-36. London: Taylor & Francis.
39. Sherrouse, B. C., Clement, J. M. and Semmens, D. J. 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied geography, 31 (2): 748-760.
40. Sieber, R. 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (3): 491-507.
41. Tuan, Y. F. 1977. Space and place: the perspective of experience, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
42. Tulloch, D. 2007. " Public participation GIS (PPGIS) ". In In: Encyclopedia of geographic information scienceSage. [online] Available from: http://www.sage-ereference.com/geoinfoscience/Article_n165.html [Accessed May 2011]
43. Tyrväinen, L., Mäkinen, K. and Schipperjn, J. 2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and urban planning, 79 (1): 5-19.
44. Williams, D. R. and Roggenbuck, J. W. 1989. " Measuring place attachment: some preliminary results ". In Abstracts of the 1989 leisure research symposium, Edited by: McAvoy, L. H. and Howard, D. 32 Arlington, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.
45. Williams, D. R. 1992. Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure sciences, 14: 29-46.
46. Young, O. R. 2007. Solving the crisis in ocean governance: place-based management of marine ecosystems. Environment: science and policy for sustainable development, 49 (4): 20-32.
47. Zhu, X., Pfueller, S. and Whitelaw, P. 2010. Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental management, 45 (5): 896-911.