Using analyses of public value orientations, attitudes and preferences to inform national forest planning in Colorado and Wyoming

Applied Geography

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 393-400

  Clement, Jessica M ^a   Cheng, Antony S ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest planning; Forest Service; National forests; Social research; Social values and attitudes; Survey methods

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; SURVEY;

COLORADO; UNITED STATES; WYOMING;

EID: 78649464971     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50:179-211.
2. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey.
3. Alessa L., Kliskey A., Brown G. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 85:27-39.
4. Allen S.D., Wickwar D.A., Clark F.P., Dow R.R., Potts R., Snyder S.A. Values, attitudes, and beliefs technical guide for Forest Service land and resource management, planning, and decision-making 2009, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-788.
5. Bright A., Manfredo M. The quality of attitudinal information regarding natural resource issues: the role of attitude-strength, importance and information. Society and Natural Recources 1995, 8:399-414.
6. Bright A., Manfredo M., Fulton D. Segmenting the public: an application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2000, 28(1):218-226.
7. Brooks J.J., Champ P.A. Understanding the wicked nature of " unmanaged recreation" in Colorado's front range. Environmental Management 2006, 38(5):784-798.
8. Brown G. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources 2005, 18:17-39.
9. Brown G. Mapping landscape values and development preferences: a method for tourism and residential development planning. International Journal of Tourism 2006, 8(2):101-113.
10. Brown G., Reed P. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science 2000, 46(2):240-247.
11. Brown G., Reed P. Public participation GIS: a new method for use in national forest planning. Forest Sciences 2009, 55:166-182.
12. Brown G., Reed P., Harris C. Testing a place-based theory of environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study. Applied Geography 2002, 22:49-76.
13. Brown G., Smith C., Alessa L., Kliskey A. A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Applied Geography 2004, 24(2):161-180.
14. Brown T. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics 1984, 60(3):231-246.
15. Burns S., Cheng A.S. The utilization of collaborative processes in forest planning. Report to the USDA forest service 2005, Office of Community Services, Fort Lewis College, Durango, CO.
16. Committee of Scientists Sustaining the people's lands: Recommendations for stewardship of the national forests and grasslands into the next century 1999, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
17. Cortner H.J., Moote M.A. The politics of ecosystem management 1999, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
18. Daniels S.E., Walker G.B. Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach 2001, Praeger Publishers, Westport, Conn.
19. Dillman D. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method 1978, Wiley, New York, NY.
20. Dillman D., Smyth J., Christian L. Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method 2007, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N.J. 3rd ed.
21. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
22. Forester J. Making participation work when interests conflict: moving from facilitating dialogue and moderating debate to mediating negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association 2006, 72(4):447-456.
23. Fulton D., Manfredo M., Lipscomb J. Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1996, 1(2):24-47.
24. Fulton David C., Skerl Kevin, Shank Erin M., Lime David W. Beliefs and attitudes toward lethal management of deer in cuyahoga valley national park. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2004, 32(4):1166-1176.
25. Gericke K.L., Sullivan J., Wellman J.D. Public participation in national forest planning: perspectives, procedures, and costs. Journal of Forestry 1992, 90(2):35-38.
26. Grilliot Amy L., Armstrong James B. A comparison of deer hunters with disabilities and nondisabled hunters in Alabama: motivations and satisfactions in deer hunting. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2005, 33(1):243-250.
27. Haas G.E. Restoring dignity to sound professional judgment. Journal of Forestry 2003, 101(9):38-43.
28. Hays S.P. The American people and the national forests: The first century of the U.S. forest service 2009, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh. 1st ed.
29. Homer P., Kahle L. A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54:638-646.
30. Larsen G., Holden A., Kapaldo D., Leasure J., Mason J., Salwasser H., et al. Synthesis of the critique of land management planning 1990, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC.
31. Lubell Mark, Vedlitz Arnold Collective action, environmental activism, and air quality policy. Political Research Quarterly 2006, 59(1):149-160.
32. Machlis Gary E., Kaplan Amanda B., Tuler Seth P., Bagby Kathleen A., McKendry Jean E. Burning questions: A social science research plan for federal wildland fire management 2002, University of Idaho, Moscow.
33. Manning R., Valliere W., Minteer B. Values, ethics, and attitudes towards national forest management: an empirical study. Society and Natural Resources 1999, 12(5):421-436.
34. McGranahan D.A. Natural amenities drive rural population change 1999, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.
35. Nielsen-Pincus M. The nuts and bolts of attachment to landscap-scale places: three case studies of social values in a landscape context. 12th International symposium on society and resource management 2006, International Association for Society and Natural Resources, Vancouver, B.C. International Association for Society and Natural Resources (Ed.).
36. Raymond C.M., Bryan B.A., MacDonald D.H., Cast A., Strathaern S., Grandgirard A., et al. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:1301-1315.
37. Reed P., Brown G. Values suitability analysis: a methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of ecosystem values in forest planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2003, 46(5):653-658.
38. Rokeach M. The nature of human values 1973, Free Press, New York, NY.
39. Rolston H. Values in nature. Environmental Ethics 1981, 3:113-128.
40. Rolston H., Coufal J. A forest ethic and multivalue forest management: the integrity of forests and of foresters are bound together. Journal of Forestry 1991, 35-40.
41. Sampson R.N., Adams D.L. Assessing forest ecosystem health in the inland west 1994, Food Products Press, Binghampton, NY.
42. Selin S.W., Schuett M.A., Carr D.S. Has collaborative planning taken root in the national forests?. Journal of Forestry 1997, 95(7):17-21.
43. Sherrouse, B. S., Clement, J. M. & Semmens, D. J. A GIS application for assessing, mapping and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography, in press.
44. Shields D., Martin I., Martin W., Haefele M. Survey results of the american public's values, objectives, beliefs and attitudes regarding forests and grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-95 2002, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
45. Shields D.J., Martin I.M., Martin W.E., Haefele M.A. Survey results of the American public's values, objectives, beliefs, and attitudes regarding forests and grasslands: A technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment 2002, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-95, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
46. Shindler B., List P., Steel B.S. Managing federal forests: public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide. Journal of Forestry 1993, 91(7):36-42.
47. SPSS 13.0 Base System 2004, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
48. Stein S. Poll: Colorado voters say future population pressures will destroy quality of life 2005, [cited 10-10-2005 2005], NPG, Inc, Available from. http://www.npg.org/pressreleases/npg_03_28_01.html.
49. Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 4th ed.
50. Tarrant M.A., Cordell H.K., Green G.T. PVF: a scale to measure public values of forests. Journal of Forestry 2003.
51. Tarrant M.A., Cordell H.K. Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environmental Management 2002, 30(5):692-703.
52. Taylor D.T., Coupal R.H., Foulke T., Rashford B., Olsen D. An economic profile of the Bridger-Teton National Forest, phase II final report 2008, University of Wyoming, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Laramie, WY.
53. Taylor D.T., Foulke T., Coupal R.H. An economic profile of the Shoshone national Forest: Prepared in support of the Shoshone national forest plan revision process 2008, University of Wyoming, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Laramie, WY.
54. Teel T., Manfredo M. Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology 2009, 24(1):128-139.
55. USDA Economic Research Service Colorado fact sheet 2005, [cited 10-10-2005 2005], US Department of Agriculture, Available from. http://www.ers.usda.gov/StateFacts/CO.htm.
56. USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service pike & san isabel national forests, Cimarron & Comanche national grasslands 2006, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pike-San Isabel National Forest, [cited May 7, 2006].
57. Vaske J.J., Donnelly M.P., Williams D.R., Jonker S. Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society & Natural Resources 2001, 14:761-776.
58. Vaske J.J., Donnelly M. A value-attitude- behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society and Natural Recources 1999, 12(6):523-537.
59. Wilkinson C.F., Anderson H.M. Land and resource planning in the national forests 1987, Island Press, Covelo, CA and Washington, D.C.
60. Williams D.R., Stewart S.I. Sense of place: an elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry 1998, 96(5):18-23.
61. Wondolleck J.M., Yaffee S.L. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management 2000, Island Press, Covelo, CA.
62. Zube E. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape Ecology 1987, 1(1):37-45.