Public participation gis: A new method for use In national forest planning

Forest Science

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 166-182

  Brown, Gregory G ^a   Reed, Pat ^b  

^a CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b US Forest Service   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest values; Internet; Mapping; Planning

Indexed keywords

ARIZONA; DECISION SUPPORTS; FOREST MANAGEMENTS; FOREST PLANNING; FOREST VALUES; INTERNET MAPPINGS; INTERNET-BASED; LESSONS LEARNED; MAPPING METHODS; NATIONAL FORESTS; PLANNING APPLICATIONS; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCES; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS; PUBLIC PARTICIPATIONS; PUBLIC TRUSTS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; PLANNING;

MAPPING;

EID: 64549136234     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alessa, N., A. KLISKEY, AND G. BROWN. 2008. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landsc. Urban Plann. 85 (1) :27-39.
2. BENGSTON, D., AND Z. Xu. 1995. Changing national forest values: A content analysis.Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-GTR-323. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN. 29 p.
3. BEVERLY, J. L., K. UTO, J. J. WILKES, AND P. BOTHWELL. 2008. Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: An Internet-based participatory mapping approach. Can. J. For. Res.38 (2) :289-303.
4. BROWN, G. 2003. A method for assessing highway qualities to integrate values in highway planning. J. Transp. Geog. 11 (4) :271-283.
5. BROWN, G. 2005. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Soc. Natur. Resour. 18 (1) :1-23.
6. BROWN, G. 2006. Mapping landscape values and development preferences: A method for tourism and residential development planning. Int. J. Tourism Res. 8 (2) :101-113.
7. BROWN, G. 2008. A THEORY OF URBAN PARK GEOGRAPHY. J. LEISURE RES. 40 (4).
8. BROWN, T. C. 1984. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Econ. 60 (3) :231-246.
9. BROWN, G., AND P. REED. 2000. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For. Sci. 46 (2) : 240-247.
10. BROWN, G., AND C. RAYMOND. 2007. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Appl. Geog. 27 (2) :89 -111.
11. BROWN, G., P. REED, AND C. C. HARRIS. 2002. Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: An Alaska case study. Appl. Geog. 22 (1) :49-77.
12. BROWN, G., C. SMITH, L. ALESSA, AND A. KLISKEY. 2004. A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Appl. Geog. 24 (2) : 161-180.
13. CLEMENT, J. 2006. Places people love and why: A multi-method exploration of values. P. 51 in Book of abstracts: 12th International symposium on society and resource management. Available online at www.issrm2006.rem.sfu.ca/ISSRM2006-Book-of-Abstracts.pdf; last accessed Sept. 2, 2008.
14. CRAIG, W. J., T. M. HARRIS, AND D. WEINER, EDITORS. 2002. Community participation and geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis, London, UK. 412 p.
15. CROUPER, M. P. 2000. Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Publ. Opin. Q. 64 (4) :464-494.
16. DILLMAN, D. A. 2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 544 p.
17. FARNUM, J. O., AND P. REED. 2008. The Chugach National Forest. P. 23-31 in Place-based planning: Innovations and applications from four western forests, Farnum, J. O., and L. E. Kruger (eds.). Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-741. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. 44 p.
18. GOODCHILD, M. 2007. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GEO-JOURNAL 69:211-221.
19. LACHAPELLE, P. R., S. F. McCool, AND M. E. PATTERSON. 2003. Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a "messy" world. Soc. Natur. Resources 16 (6) :473-490.
20. LORD, B. E., AND W. F. ELMENDORF. 2008. Are recreation organizations representatives of all participants? J. Park Recr. Admin. 26 (1) :87-96.
21. MADDEN, M. 2006. Data memo: Internet penetration and impact. Available online at http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs /PIP-Internet-Impact.pdf; last accessed May 19, 2007.
22. NIELSEN-PINCUS, M. 2006. The nuts and bolts of attachment to landscape-scale places: Three case studies of social values in a landscape context. P. 228 in Book of abstracts: 12th International symposium on society and resource management. Available online at www.issrm2006.rem. sfu.ca/ISSRM2006-Book-of-Abstracts.pdf; last accessed Sept. 2, 2008.
23. PEW INTERNET and AMERICAN LIFE PROJECT. 2006. Data. Available online at www.pewinternet.org/ data.asp; last accessed Sep. 2, 2008.
24. PFUELLER, S., Z. XUAN, P. WHITELAW, AND C. WINTER. 2006. Community values for the Murray River Reserves. Draft report. Available from Sharron Pfueller, Monash University, sharron. pfueller@arts.monash.edu.au.
25. RAYMOND, C., AND G. BROWN. 2007. A spatial method for assessing resident and visitor attitudes toward tourism growth and development. J. Sustain. Tourism 15 (5) :520-540.
26. REED, P., AND G. BROWN. 2003. Values suitability analysis: A methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of forest ecosystem values in national forest planning. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 46 (5) :643-658.
27. ROLSTON, H., AND J. COUFAL. 1991. A forest ethic and multivalue forest management. J. For. 89 (4) :35-40.
28. SAWICKI, D. S., AND D. R. PETERMAN. 2002. Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States. P. 17-36 in Community participation and geographic information systems, Craig, W. J., T. M. Harris, and D. M. Weiner (eds.). Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
29. SCHALLAU, C. H. 1989. Sustained yield versus community stability. J. For. 87 (9) :16-23.
30. SIEBER, R. 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geographers 96 (3) :491-507.
31. STEINER, F. 2000. the living landscape: an ecological approach to landscape planning. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 477 p.
32. SUROWIECKI, J. 2004. The wisdom of crowds. Doubleday, New York, NY. 296 p.
33. WILLIAMS, D. R., AND J. J. VASKE. 2003. The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalisability of a psychometric approach. For. Sci. 49 (6) :830-840.
34. WONDELLECK, J. L., AND S. L. YAFFEE. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, DC. 280 p.
35. ZUBE, E. H. 1987. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landsc. Ecol. 1 (1) :37-45.