Mapping a values typology in three counties of the interior Northwest, USA: Scale, geographic associations among values, and the use of intensity weights

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 535-552

  Nielsen Pincus, Max ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Environmental values; Gis; Intensity weights; Postmaterialism; Survey research

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; GIS; MAPPING METHOD; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SURVEY METHOD; TYPOLOGY;

IDAHO; OREGON; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79957818813     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920903140972     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aberly, D. (Ed.). 1993. Boundaries of home: Mapping for local empowerment. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
2. Beverly, J. L., K. Uto, J. Wilkes, and P. Bothwell. 2008. Assessing the spatial attributes of forest landscape values: An internet-based participatory mapping approach. Can. J. For. Res. 38:289-303.
3. Brechin, S. R., and W. Kempton. 1994. Global environmentalism: A challenge to the post-materialsim thesis? Social Sci. Q. 75:245-269.
4. Brown, G., and P. Reed. 2000. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For. Sci. 46:240-247.
5. Brown G., P. Reed, and C. C. Harris. 2002. Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: An Alaska case study. Appl. Geogr. 22:49-76.
6. Brown, G. 2005. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society Nat. Resources 18:17-39.
7. Chambers, R. 1990. Rapid and participatory rural appraisal. Appropriate Technol. 4:14-16.
8. Cheng, A. S., and S. E. Daniels. 2003. Examining the interaction between geographic scale and ways of knowing in ecosystem management: A case study of place-based collaborative planning. For. Sci. 49:841-854.
9. Cuthbert, A. L., and W. P Anderson. 2002. Using spatial statistics to examine the pattern of urban land development in Halifax-Dartmouth. Prof. Geogr. 54:521-532.
10. Dietz, T., A. Fitzgerald, and R. Shwom. 2005. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resources 30:335-372.
11. Dillman, D. 2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
12. Dunlap, R. E., and A. G. Mertig. 1997. Global environmentalism concern: An anomaly for post-materialism. Social Sci. Q. 78:24-29.
13. Hartigan, J. A., and P. M. Hartigan 1985. The dip test of unimodality. Ann. Stat. 13:70-84.
14. Hester, R. 1985. Subconcious landscapes of the heart. Places 2:10-22.
15. Ingelhart, R. 1990. Cultural shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Johnson, D. E. 1998. Applied multivariate methods for data analysts. New York: Duxbery Press.
17. Kohrman, E. 2006. Paradoxes of place: Creating a vision and plan for sustainability. Presentation at the 12th International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3-8 June.
18. Kretser, H. E., P. J. Sullivan, and B. A. Knuth. 2008. Housing density as an indicator of spatial patterns of reported human-wildlife interactions in northern New York. Landscape Urban Plan. 84:282-292.
19. Miller, R. G. 1981. Simultaneous statistical inference, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Nielsen-Pincus, M. 2007. Place, resource management, and culture clash: Land use plans, attitudes, values, and relationship with place in three counties of northern Idaho and northeastern Oregon. Doctoral thesis, Department of Forest Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.
21. Pocewicz, A., M. Nielsen-Pincus, C. S. Goldberg, M. H. Johnson, P. Morgan, J. E. Force, L. P. Waits, and L. Vierling. 2008. Predicting land use change: comparison of models based on landowner surveys and historical land cover trends. Landscape Ecol. 23: 195-210.
22. Rokeach, M. 1973. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
23. Shumway, J. M., and S. M. Otterstrom. 2001. Spatial patterns of migration and income change in the Mountain West: The dominance of service-based and amenity-rich counties. Prof. Geogr. 53:492-502.
24. Stern, P. C., and T. Dietz. 1994. The value basis of environmental concern. J. Social Issues 50:65-84.
25. Schwartz, S. H., and W. Bilsky. 1994. Towards a psychological structure of human values. J. Personality Social Psychol. 53:550-562.
26. Turner, M. G., R. V. O'Niel, R. H. Gardner, and B. T. Milne. 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 3:153-162.
27. U. S. Census Bureau. 2005. Table 1: Ranking of Census 2000 and projected 2030 state population change. www.census.gov/population/projections/PressTab1.xls
28. Vaske, J. J., M. P. Donnelly, D. R. Williams, and S. Jonker. 2001. Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society Nat. Resources 14:761-776.
29. Willcox, L., B. Robinson, and A. Harvey. 1998. A sense of place: Issues, attitudes, and resources in the Yellowstone to Yukon ecoregion. Canmore, Canada: Yellowstone to Yukon Initiative.
30. Xu, Z., and D. N. Bengston. 1997. Trends in national forest values among forestry professionals, environmentalists, and the news media, 1982-1993. Society Nat. Resources 10:43-59.
31. Yung, L., W. A. Freimund, and J. M. Belsky. 2003. The politics of place: Understanding meaning, common ground, and political difference on the Rocky Mountain Front. For. Sci. 49:855-866.