Facilitating code-writing in PI classes

SIGCSE 2013 - Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 585-590

  Zingaro, Daniel ^a   Cherenkova, Yuliya ^a   Karpova, Olessia ^a   Petersen, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Active learning; CS1; Pair programming; Peer investigation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENCODING (SYMBOLS);

ACTIVE LEARNING; CLASSROOM IMPLEMENTATION; CLASSROOM RESPONSE SYSTEMS; INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING; MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS; PAIR-PROGRAMMING; PEER INVESTIGATION; REAL-TIME FEEDBACK;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84876268699     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2445196.2445369     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. I. D. Beatty, W. J. Gerace, W. J. Leonard, and R. J. Dufresne. Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74:31{39, 2006.
2. C. H. Crouch, J. Watkins, A. P. Fagen, and E. Mazur. Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once. In E. F. Redish and P. J. Cooney, editors, Research-Based Reform of University Physics. American Association of Physics Teachers, 2007.
3. Q. Cutts, S. Esper, M. Fecho, S. R. Foster, and B. Simon. The abstraction transition taxonomy: Developing desired learning outcomes through the lensof situated cognition. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Computing Education Research, New York, NY, 2012.
4. Q. Cutts, G. Kennedy, C. Mitchell, and S. Draper. Maximising dialogue in lectures using group response systems. 7th IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education. www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/quintin/ papers/cate2004.pdf (accessed August 19, 2011), 2004.
5. U. Fuller, C. G. Johnson, T. Ahoniemi, D. Cukierman, I. Hernan-Losada, J. Jackova, E. Lahtinen, T. L. Lewis, D. M. Thompson, C. Riedesel, and E. Thompson. Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomy. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(4):152{170, Dec. 2007.
6. P. J. Guo. Online Python Tutor: Embeddable web-based program visualization for CS education. In Proceedings of the 44th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2013.
7. J. K. Knight and W. B. Wood. Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4:298{310, 2005.
8. N. Lasry. Clickers or ashcards: Is there really a diffierence? The Physics Teacher, 46:242{244, 2008.
9. N. Lasry, E. Mazur, and J. Watkins. Peer instruction: From harvard to the two-year college. American Journal of Physics, 76:1066{1069, 2008.
10. T. L. Naps, G. Rossling, V. Almstrum, W. Dann, R. Fleischer, C. Hundhausen, A. Korhonen, L. Malmi, M. McNally, S. Rodger, and J. A. Velazquez-Iturbide. Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education. SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(2):131{152, June 2002.
11. R. P. Pargas and D. M. Shah. Things are clicking in computer science courses. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 474{478, New York, NY, 2006.
12. A. Petersen, M. Craig, and D. Zingaro. Reviewing CS1 exam question content. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 631{636, New York, NY, 2011.
13. L. Porter, C. Bailey Lee, B. Simon, Q. Cutts, and D. Zingaro. Experience report: a multi-classroom report on the value of peer instruction. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 138{142, New York, NY, 2011.
14. N. Ragonis and M. Ben-Ari. On understanding the statics and dynamics of object-oriented programs. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 226{230, New York, NY, 2005.
15. B. Simon, M. Kohanfars, J. Lee, K. Tamayo, and Q. Cutts. Experience report: Peer instruction in introductory computing. In Proceedings of the 41st SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 341{345, New York, NY, 2010.
16. J. L. Whalley, R. Lister, E. Thompson, T. Clear, P. Robbins, P. K. A. Kumar, and C. Prasad. An australasian study of reading and comprehension skills in novice programmers, using the bloom and solo taxonomies. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Computing Education, pages 243{252, Darlinghurst, Australia, 2006.
17. D. Zingaro. Experience report: Peer instruction in remedial computer science. In Proceedings of the 22nd World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, pages 5030{5035. AACE, 2010.
18. D. Zingaro, A. Petersen, and M. Craig. Stepping up to integrative questions on CS1 exams. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 253{258, New York, NY, 2012.