Attention, Awareness of Contingencies, and Control in Spatial Localization: A Qualitative Difference Approach

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1342-1357

  Vaquero, Joaquín M M ^a   Fiacconi, Chris ^b   Milliken, Bruce ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Awareness; Contingencies; Qualitative differences; Spatial priming; Verbal report

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; COLOR VISION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBABILITY LEARNING; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650078240     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020406     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bartolomeo P., Decaix C., Siéroff E. The phenomenology of endogenous orienting. Consciousness & Cognition 2007, 16:144-161.
2. Bovens N., Brysbaert M. IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2 Turbo Pascal timing with extended resolution. Behavior Research, Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1990, 22:332-334.
3. Cheesman J., Merikle P.M. Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics 1984, 36:387-395.
4. Cheesman J., Merikle P.M. Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1986, 40:343-367.
5. Cleeremans A., Jiménez L. Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. Implicit learning and consciousness 2002, 1-40. Psychology Press, Hove, England. R.M. French, A. Cleeremans (Eds.).
6. Daza M., Ortells J.J., Fox E. Perception without awareness: Further evidence from a Stroop priming task. Perception and Psychophysics 2002, 64:1316-1324.
7. Destrebecqz A., Cleeremans A. Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8(2):343-350.
8. Dixon N.F. Preconscious processing 1981, Wiley, New York, NY.
9. Eimer M. Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101:293-313.
10. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:514-520.
11. Eriksen C.W. Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation. Psychological Review 1960, 67:279-300.
12. Folk C., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary convert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18(4):1030-1044.
13. Glaser M.O., Glaser W.R. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1982, 8:875-894.
14. Holender D. Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1986, 9:1-23.
15. Hommel B. Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition 1998, 5:183-216.
16. Hommel B., Musseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-937.
17. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-541.
18. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219.
19. Kentridge R.W., Heywood C.A., Weiskrantz L. Attention without awareness in blindsight. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 1999, 266:1805-1811.
20. Lambert A., Naikar N., McLachlan K., Aitken V. A new component of visual orienting: Implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1999, 25:321-340.
21. Lambert A., Norris A., Naikar N., Aitken V. Effects of informative peripheral cues on eye movements: Revisiting William James' " derived attention" Visual Cognition 2000, 7:545-569.
22. Lambert A., Sumich A.L. Spatial orienting controlled without awareness: A semantically based implicit learning effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1996, 49A:490-518.
23. Mack A., Rock I. Inattentional blindness 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. McCormick P.A. Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:168-180.
25. Merikle P.M., Cheesman J. Current status of research on subliminal perception. Advances in Consumer Research 1987, XIV:298-302.
26. Merikle P.M., Joordens S. Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 1997, 6:219-236.
27. Merikle P.M., Reingold E.M. Measuring unconscious perceptual processes. Perception without awareness 1992, 55-80. Guilford, New York, NY. R.F. Bornstein, T.S. Pittman (Eds.).
28. Milliken, B., Leboe, J., & Bates, D. (2010). Event file updating in spatial localization: Selective use of specific prior experience. Manuscript in preparation.
29. Milliken B., Rock A. Negative priming, attention, and discriminating the present from the past. Invited submission to Consciousness and Cognition 1997, 6:308-327.
30. Milliken B., Tipper S.P., Houghton G., Lupiáñez J. Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:1280-1296.
31. Most S.B., Simons D.J., Scholl B.J., Jiménez R., Clifford E., Chabris C.F. How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science 2001, 12(1):9-17.
32. Park J., Kanwisher N. Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1994, 20:613-623.
33. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X: Control of Language processes 1984, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Houma, D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.).
34. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R. Attention and cognitive control. Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium 1975, 55-85. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R.L. Solso (Ed.).
35. Shanks D.R., St.John M.F. Characteristics of dissociable learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1994, 17:367-447.
36. Simons D.J., Chabris C.F. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 1999, 28:1059-1074.
37. Skye, A., & Milliken, B. (2010). Attending, ignoring, and the automatic/strategic distinction: A qualitative difference finding. Manuscript in preparation.
38. Taylor D.A. Time course of context effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1977, 106:404-426.
39. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1985, 37A:571-590.
40. Underwood G. Attention and awareness in cognitive and motor skills. Aspects of consciousness. Volume 3. Awareness and self- awareness 1982, Academic Press, New York, NY. G. Underwood (Ed.).
41. Van Selst M.A., Jolicoeur P. A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1994, 47A:631-650.