Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2007, Pages

  Fecteau, Jillian H ^a,b,c  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR NEUROSCIENCE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Automatic; Goal; Implicit; Mental or task set; Priming of pop out

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; FORM PERCEPTION; GOALS; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 34047236709     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.6.1     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ambinder, M., & Simons, D. J. (2005). Attention capture: The interplay of expectations, attention, and awareness. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 69-75). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
2. Bichot, N. P., & Schall, J. D. (2002). Priming in macaque frontal cortex during popout visual search: Feature-based facilitation and location-based inhibition of return. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 4675-4685. [PubMed] [Article]
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436. [PubMed]
4. Caputo, G. S., & Guerra. S. (1998). Attentional selection by distractor suppression. Vision Research, 38, 669-689. [PubMed]
5. Dobbins, I. G., Schnyer, D. M., Verfaellie, M., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. Nature, 428, 316-319. [PubMed]
6. Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297. [PubMed]
7. Fecteau, J. H., Bell, A. H., & Munoz, D. P. (2004). Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention, Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1728-1737. [PubMed] [Article]
8. Fecteau, J. H., & Munoz, D. P. (2003). Exploring the consequences of the previous trial. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 435-443. [PubMed]
9. Fecteau, J. H., & Munoz, D. P. (2006). Salience, relevance, and firing: A priority map for target selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 382-390. [PubMed]
10. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858. [PubMed]
11. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044. [PubMed]
12. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317-329. [PubMed]
13. Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 800-817. [PubMed]
14. Huang, L., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 12-20. [PubMed]
15. Huang, L., & Pashler, H. (2005). Expectation and repetition effects in searching for featural singletons in very brief displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 150-157. [PubMed]
16. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. USA: Dover Publications.
17. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Cambridge, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
18. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147. [PubMed]
19. Koch, I., & Allport, A. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34, 433-444. [PubMed]
20. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying nueral circuity. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227. [PubMed]
21. Kristjánsson, A. (2006). Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task. Vision Research, 46, 2554-2570. [PubMed]
22. Kristjánsson, Á., Wang, D., & Nakayama, K. (2002). The role of priming in conjunctive visual search. Cognition, 85, 37-52. [PubMed]
23. Lamme, V. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571-579. [PubMed]
24. Lamme, V. A., Zipser, K., & Spekreijse, H. (2002). Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1044-1053. [PubMed]
25. Lavie, N. (2001). The role of capacity limits in selective attention: Behavioural evidence and implications for neural activity. In J. Braun & C. Koch (Eds.), Visual attention and cortical circuits (pp. 49-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197. [PubMed]
27. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of popout: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672. [PubMed]
28. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of popout: II. Role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977-991. [PubMed]
29. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of popout: III. A short term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
30. Meeter, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2006). Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search. Visual Cognition, 13, 202-221.
31. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
32. Merikle, P. M., & Daneman, M. (2000). Conscious versus unconscious perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 1295-1303). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140. [PubMed]
35. Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112, 217-242. [PubMed]
36. Most, S. B., & Simons, D. J. (2001). Attention capture, orienting, and awareness. In C. Folk & B. Gibson (Eds.), Attraction, distraction and action; multiple perspectives on attentional capture. Advances in psychology (vol. 133, pp. 151-173). New York: Elsevier.
37. Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. F. (2000). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12, 9-17. [PubMed]
38. Nakayama, K., Maljkovic, V., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2004). Short-term memory for the rapid deployment of visual attention. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Cognitive neurosciences III (pp. 397-408). USA: MIT Press.
39. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. USA: MIT Press.
40. Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2006). On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity-driven. Visual Cognition, 13, 1-28.
41. Pashler, H., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629-651. [PubMed]
42. Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N., & Theeuwes, J. (2005). Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1354-1361. [PubMed]
43. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25. [PubMed]
44. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42. [PubMed]
45. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442. [PubMed] [Link]
46. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
47. Rubin, O., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous influences on task-set activation in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1033-1046. [PubMed]
48. Schacter, D. L., Dobbins, I. G., & Schnyer, D. M. (2004). Specificity of priming: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 853-862. [PubMed]
49. Theeuwes, J. (2005). Irrelevant singletons capture attention. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 418-424). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
50. Treisman, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing, Scientific American, 255, 114-125.
51. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. [PubMed]
52. Tsotsos, J. K. (1990). Analyzing vision at the complexity level. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 423-445.
53. Wang, D., Kristjánsson, Á., & Nakayama, K. (2005). Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 239-253. [PubMed]
54. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0, a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
55. Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 483-502. [PubMed]
56. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121-134. [PubMed]