System identification in Priming of Pop-Out

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 21, 2010, Pages 2110-2115

  Martini, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Kernel analysis; Linear prediction; Prediction error; Priming of Pop Out; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KERNEL METHOD; LEARNING; LINEAR SYSTEM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77956648137     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baddeley R.J., Ingram H.A., Miall R.C. System identification applied to a visuomotor task: Near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23(7):3066-3075.
2. Bertelson P. Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature 1965, 206(980):217-218.
3. Corrado G.S., Sugrue L.P., Seung H.S., Newsome W.T. Linear-nonlinear-Poisson models of primate choice dynamics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2005, 84(3):581-617.
4. DeCarlo L.T., Cross D.V. Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: Models and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1990, 119(4):375-396.
5. Goodfellow L.D. A psychological interpretation of the results of the Zenith radio experiments in telepathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1938, 23(6):601-632.
6. Goolsby B.A., Suzuki S. Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and " retrieval" Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63(6):929-944.
7. Hagelbarger D.W. SEER, a sequence extrapolating robot. IRE Transactions on Electronic Computers 1956, EC-5(1):1-7.
8. Hunter I., Davison M. Determination of a behavioral transfer function: White-noise analysis of session-to-session response-ratio dynamics on concurrent VI VI schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1985, 43(1):43-59.
9. Hurst H.E., Black R.P., Simaika Y.M. Long-term storage, an experimental study 1965, (p. xiv, 145 p), Constable, London.
10. Kristjansson A. " I know what you did on the last trial" - a selective review of research on priming in visual search. Frontiers in Bioscience 2008, 13:1171-1181.
11. Laming D.R. Subjective probability in choice-reaction experiments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1969, 6(1):81-120.
12. Lau B., Glimcher P.W. Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2005, 84(3):555-579.
13. Maljkovic V., Martini P. Implicit short-term memory and event frequency effects in visual search. Vision Research 2005, 45(21):2831-2846.
14. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22(6):657-672.
15. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. 1996. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58(7):977-991.
16. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition 2000, 7(5):571-595.
17. Marmarelis V.Z., Berger T.W. General methodology for nonlinear modeling of neural systems with Poisson point-process inputs. Mathematical Biosciences 2005, 196(1):1-13.
18. Marmarelis P.Z., Marmarelis V.Z. Analysis of physiological systems: The white-noise approach 1978, (p. xvi, 487), Plenum Press, New York.
19. Maunsell J.H. Neuronal representations of cognitive state: Reward or attention?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8(6):261-265.
20. McClure S.M., Ericson K.M., Laibson D.I., Loewenstein G., Cohen J.D. Time discounting for primary rewards. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(21):5796-5804.
21. Rustichini A. Dual or unitary system? Two alternative models of decision making. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2008, 8(4):355-362.
22. Senders V.L., Sowards A. Analysis of response sequences in the setting of a psychophysical experiment. American Journal of Psychology 1952, 65:358-374.
23. Skinner B.F. The processes involved in the repeated guessing of alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1942, 30(6):495-503.
24. Stewart N., Brown G.D.A., Chater N. Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2002, 28(1):3-11.
25. Sugrue L.P., Corrado G.S., Newsome W.T. Choosing the greater of two goods: Neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6(5):363-375.
26. Sutton R.S., Barto A.G. Reinforcement learning: An introduction 1998, (p. xviii, 322 p), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
27. Taylor L.R., Woiwod I.P., Perry J.N. Density-dependence of spatial behavior and rarity of randomness. Journal of Animal Ecology 1978, 47(2):383-406.
28. Treisman M., Faulkner A. The setting and maintenance of criteria representing levels of confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10(1):119-139.
29. Verplanck W.S., Collier G.H., Cotton J.W. Nonindependence of successive responses in measurements of the visual threshold. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952, 44(4):273-282.
30. Wagenmakers E.-J., Brown S. On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review 2007, 114(3):830-841.