Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1059-1071

  Lee, Hyunkyu ^a   Mozer, Michael C ^b   Vecera, Shaun P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 68949194389     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1059     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ariga, A., & Kawahara, J. (2004). The perceptual and cognitive distractor-previewing effect. Journal of Vision, 4(10, Art. 5), 891-903. doi:10.1167/4.10.5
2. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
3. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
4. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 224-234.
5. Desimone, R. (1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 353, 1245-1255.
6. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
7. Duncan, J. (1996). Information and uncertainty in a cumulative science of behavior: 25 years after Broadbent's decision and stress. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 617-655.
8. Duncan, J. (1998). Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 353, 1307-1317.
9. Fecteau, J. H. (2007). Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers. Journal of Vision, 7(6, Art. 1), 1-11. doi:10.1167/7.6.1
10. Fecteau, J. H., & Munoz, D. P. (2003). Exploring the consequences of the previous trial. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 435-443.
11. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Bottom-up priming of topdown attentional control settings. Visual Cognition, 8, 215-231.
12. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
13. Goolsby, B. A., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2005). Adaptive modulation of color salience contingent upon global form coding and task relevance. Vision Research, 45, 901-930.
14. Goolsby, B. A., & Suzuki, S. (2001). Understanding priming of colorsingleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and "retrieval." Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 929-944.
15. Harter, M. R., & Aine, C. J. (1984). Brain mechanisms of visual selective attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Ed.), Varieties of attention (pp. 293-321). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
16. Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 800-817.
17. Huang, L., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 12-20.
18. Lee, H., & Vecera, S. P. (2007). Unpublished data.
19. Lleras, A., Kawahara, J., Wan, X. I., & Ariga, A. (2008). Intertrial inhibition of focused attention in pop-out search. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 114-131.
20. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
21. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
22. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. Role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977-991.
23. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
24. Mozer, M. C., Kinoshita, S., & Shettel, M. (2007). Sequential dependencies offer insight into cognitive control. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 180-193). New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Mozer, M. C., Shettel, M., & Vecera, S. P. (2006). Top-down control of visual attention: A rational account. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 18, 923-930.
26. Muller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
27. Muller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulusand expectance-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1021-1035.
28. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertribal contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 650-657.
29. Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1243-1265.
30. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
31. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-74). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
32. Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 483-502.
33. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.