Erratum to "Priming of pop-out on multiple time scales during visual search" [Vision Res. 51 (2011) 1972-1978] DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.007;Priming of pop-out on multiple time scales during visual search

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 1972-1978

  Brascamp, Jan W ^a   Pels, Elmar ^b   Kristjánsson, Árni ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Attention; Perceptual memory; Priming; Priming of pop out; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 80052156348     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.06.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (37)

1. Ásgeirsson Á.G., Kristjánsson Á.G. Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2011, 73:1350-1360.
2. Becker S.I. The stage of priming: Are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional?. Vision Research 2008, 48:664-684.
3. Brascamp, J. W., Blake, R. & Kristjánsson, Á. G. (in press). Deciding where to attend: Priming of pop-out drives target selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
4. Brascamp J.W., Knapen T., Kanai R., Noest A., van Ee R., van den Berg A.V. Multi-timescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(1):e1497.
5. Brascamp J.W., Pearson J., Blake R., van den Berg A.V. Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: Implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(3):1-23.
6. Bravo M., Nakayama K. The role of attention in different visual search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 1992, 51:465-472.
7. Campana G., Cowey A., Walsh V. Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: A test of perceptual memory. Cerebral Cortex 2002, 12:663-669.
8. Campana G., Cowey A., Walsh V. Visual area V5/MT remembers "what" but not "where" Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:1766-1770.
9. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 1989, 96:433-458.
10. Geyer T., Müller H.J., Krummenacher J. Cross-trial priming in visual search for singleton conjunction targets: Role of repeated target and distractor features. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:736-749.
11. Geyer T., Zehetleitner M., Müller H. Positional priming of pop-out: A relational-encoding account. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(2):3,1-17.
12. Goolsby B.A., Suzuki S. Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and "retrieval" Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:929-944.
13. Iglewitcz B., Hoaglin D.C. How to detect and handle outliers 1993, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
14. Kiss M., Driver J., Eimer M. Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychological Science 2009, 20:245-251.
15. Kristjánsson Á. Rapid learning in attention shifts - A review. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:324-362.
16. Kristjánsson Á. "I know what you did on the last trial" - A selective review of research on priming in visual search. Frontiers in Bioscience 2008, 13:1171-1181.
17. Kristjánsson Á. Learning in shifts of transient attention improves recognition of parts of ambiguous figure-ground displays. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(4):21,1-11.
18. Kristjánsson Á., Driver J. Priming in visual search: Separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal. Vision Research 2008, 48(10):1217-1232.
19. Kristjansson Á., Mackeben M., Nakayama K. Rapid, object based learning in the deployment of transient attention. Perception 2001, 20:1375-1387.
20. Kristjánsson Á., Sigurjónsdóttir Ó., Driver J. Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2010, 72:1229-1236.
21. Kristjánsson Á., Vuilleumier P., Schwartz S., Macaluso E., Driver J. Neural basis for priming of pop-out revealed with fMRI. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:1612-1624.
22. Kristjánsson Á., Wang D., Nakayama K. The role of priming in conjunctive visual search. Cognition 2002, 85:37-52.
23. Lamy D., Antebi C., Aviani N., Carmel T. Priming of pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Vision Research 2008, 48(1):30-41.
24. Lamy D., Yashar A., Ruderman L. A dual-stage account of inter-trial priming effects. Vision Research 2010, 50:1396-1401.
25. Leopold D., Wilke M., Maier A., Logothetis N. Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(6):605-609.
26. Maljkovic V., Martini P. Implicit short-term memory and event frequency effects in visual search. Vision Research 2005, 45:2831-2846.
27. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory and Cognition 1994, 22:657-672.
28. Martini P. System identification in priming of pop-out. Vision Research 2010, 50:2110-2115.
29. Nakayama K., Maljkovic V., Kristjánsson Á. Short term memory for the rapid deployment of visual attention. The cognitive neurosciences 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 3rd ed. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
30. Olivers C.N.L., Meeter M. On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:1-28.
31. Pastukhov A., Braun J. A short-term memory of multi-stable perception. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(13):7,1-14.
32. Pearson J., Brascamp J.W. Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12(9):334-341.
33. Saevarsson S., Jóelsdóttir S., Hjaltason H., Kristjánsson Á. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2008, 45:1161-1169.
34. Sigurdardottir H.M., Kristjánsson Á., Driver J. Repetition streaks increase perceptual sensitivity in brief visual search displays. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:643-658.
35. Treisman A., Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 1988, 95:15-48.
36. Wang D., Kristjánsson Á., Nakayama K. Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:239-253.
37. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:202-238.