The function of art students’ use of studio conversations in relation to their artwork

International Journal of Education and the Arts

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1-29

  Svensson, Lennart ^a   Edström, Ann Mari ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876153738     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15298094     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderberg, E. (2000). Word meaning and conceptions: An empirical study of relationships between students’ thinking and use of language when reasoning about a problem. Instructional Science, 28, 89-113.
2. Anderberg, E., Svensson, L., Alvegård, C. & Johansson, T. (2008). The epistemological role of language use in learning: A phenomenographic intentional-expressive approach. Educational Research Review, 3, 14-29.
3. Austerlitz, N., Blythman, M., Grove-White, A., Jones, B. A., Jones, C. A., Morgan, S. J., Orr, S., Shreeve, A. & Vaughan, S. (2008). Mind the gap: Expectations, ambiguity and pedagogy within art and design higher education. In L. Drew (Ed.), The Student Experience in Art and Design Higher Education: Drivers for Change. Cambridge: Jill Rogers Associates Ltd.
4. Bach Hansen, I. (2001). Samtidskunstens erkendelsespotentiale – om tegnet, betydningerne og valet (The potential for awareness of contemporary art – on the sign, the meanings and choice). In K. Arvedsen & H. Illeris (Eds.), Samtidskunst og undervisning (Contemporary art and education). Copenhagen: Center for billedpaedagogisk forskning, Danmarks Paedagogiske Universitet.
5. Barnett, R. & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
6. Booth, S. & Ingerman, Å. (2002). Making sense of physics in the first year of study. Learning and Instruction, 12, 443-507.
7. Bowden, J. (2004). Capabilities-driven curriculum design. In Baillie & Moore (Eds.), Effective teaching and learning in engineering. London: Routledge Falmer.
8. Bowden, J. & Marton, F. (1998). University of learning. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
9. Edström, A-M. (1998). Konstnärligt lärande (Artistic learning). (Unpublished masters thesis). Lund University, Sweden.
10. Edström, A-M. (2006). Att forska om lärande i konst (Researching learning in visual art practice). Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige (Journal of Swedish Educational Research), 11(3), 195-213.
11. Edström, A-M. (2008a). To rest assured: A study of artistic development. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 9(3), http://www.ijea.org/v9n3/
12. Edström, A-M. (2008b) Art students making use of studio conversations. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 7(1), 31-44.
13. Efland, A. (2002). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum. New York: Teacher's College, Columbia University.
14. Hall, J. (2010). Making art, teaching art, learning art: Exploring the concept of the artist teacher. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 103-110.
15. Harwood, E. (2007). Artists in the academy: Curriculum and instruction. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education (pp. 313-329). Dordrecht: Springer.
16. Hickman, R. (2010). Self portrait: An account of the artist as educator. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 11(portrayal 2), http://www.ijea.org/v11p2/
17. Hjelde, K. (2008). Between fine art and teaching: Reflecting creative passion. In N. Austerlitz (Ed.), Unspoken Interactions. Exploring the unspoken dimension of learning and teaching in creative subjects (pp. 141-151). London: The Centre for Learning and Teaching in Art and Design.
18. Johansson, B., Marton, F. & Svensson, L. (1985). An approach to describing learning as a change between qualitatively different conceptions. In L.T.H. West & A.L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 233-258). Academic Press, Inc.
19. Lockheart, J., Gamble, M., Miller, J., fisher, G. & Henderson, D. (2008). Practice based learning and teaching: A real world experience? In L. Drew (Ed.), The student experience in art and design higher education: Drivers for change (pp. 149-165). Cambridge: Jill Rogers Associates Ltd.
20. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-199.
21. Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
22. Marton, F. & Svensson, L. (1979). Conceptions of research in student learning. Higher Education, 8, 471-486.
23. Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum and associates.
24. Marton, F., Hounsell, D. & Entwistle, N. (Eds.). (1997). The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
25. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data Analysis. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
26. Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
27. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
28. Riley, H. (2007). Beyond the horizon: Future directions for the teaching of visual art practice. Journal of Visual Art Practice 6(1), 73-80.
29. Shreeve, A. (2009). 'I'd rather be seen as a practitioner, come in to teach my subject': Identity work in part-time art and design tutors. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 28(2) 151-159.
30. Singerman, H. (1999). Art subjects: Making artists in the American university. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
31. Sullivan, G. (1996). Critical interpretive inquiry: A qualitative study of five contemporary artists’ ways of seeing. Studies in Art Education, 37(4), 210-225.
32. Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
33. Svensson, L. (1976). Study skill and learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gothenburg University, Sweden.
34. Svensson, L. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning III: Study skill and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977(47), 233-243.
35. Svensson, L. (1989). The conceptualization of cases of physical motion. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4(4), 529-545.
36. Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 159-171.
37. Svensson, L. (2002). Learning environments of knowledge intensive company units in five European countries. Final report of the LATIO research project sponsored by the European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.pjb.co.uk/npl/bp30.htm
38. Svensson, L. (2005). Issues of methodology: Contextual analysis. Material for a seminar at the EERA post graduate and new researcher’s pre-conference, Dublin 5-6 Sept. 2005.
39. Svensson, L. (2009). Learning environments of employees in knowledge-intensive company units. In C. R. Velde (Ed.), International Perspectivees on Competence in the Workplace: Implications for Research, Policy and Practice (pp. 159-182). Dordrecht: Springer.
40. Svensson, L., Anderberg, E., Alvegård, C. & Johansson, T. (2009). The use of language in understanding subject matter. Instructional Science, 37, 205-225.
41. Svensson, L. & Wihlborg, M. (2007). Internationalisation in the Swedish nurse education from the perspective of teachers involved. An interview study. Higher Education 53, 279-305.
42. Svensson; L & Wihlborg, M. (2010). Internationalising the content of higher education: The need for a curriculum perspective. Higher Education, 60 (6), 595-613.