Variance in epistasis links gene regulation and evolutionary rate in the yeast genetic interaction network

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1080-1087

  Fierst, Janna L ^a   Phillips, Patrick C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Divergence; Fitness; Gene expression; Gene regulation; Noise; Nucleosome occupancy; Plasticity; Variance

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FUNGAL GENE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETICS; LETTER; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION RATE; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES, FUNGAL; MUTATION RATE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; YEASTS;

EID: 84876030260     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evs083     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Agarwal S, Deane CM, Porter MA, Jones NS. 2010. Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 6:e1000817.
2. Bell G. 2010. Experimental genomics of fitness in yeast. Proc Biol Sci. 277: 1459-1467.
3. Bellay J, et al. 2011. Putting genetic interactions in context through a global modular decomposition. Genome Res. 21:1375-1387.
4. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang DU. 2006. Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep. 424:175-308.
5. Boone C, Bussey H, Andrews BJ. 2007. Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nature Rev Genet. 8:437-449.
6. Brem R, Kruglyak L. 2005. The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102: 1572-1577.
7. Causton HC, et al. 2001. Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell. 12:323-337.
8. Choi JK, Kim YJ. 2008. Epigenetic regulation and the variability of gene expression. Nat Genet. 40:141-147.
9. Choi JK, Kim YJ. 2009. Intrinsic variability of gene expression encoded in nucleosome positioning sequences. Nat Genet. 41:498-503.
10. Chou HH, Chiu HC, Delaney NF, Segre D, Marx CJ. 2011. Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science 332:1190-1192.
11. Costanzo M, et al. 2010. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425-431.
12. Denver DR, et al. 2005. The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Genet. 37:544-548.
13. Dixon SJ, Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Andrews B, Boone C. 2009. Systematic mapping of genetic interaction networks. Ann Rev Genet. 43:601-625.
14. Gasch AP, et al. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell. 11:4241-4257.
15. Giaever G, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387-391.
16. Gui Y, et al. 2011. Frequent mutations of chromatin remodeling genes in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Nat Genet. 43:875-878.
17. Hahn MW, Conant GC, Wagner A. 2004. Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: does connectivity equal constraint? J Mol Evol. 58: 203-211.
18. Hakes L, Pinney JW, Robertson DL, Lovell SC. 2008. Protein-protein interaction networks and biology-what's the connection? Nat Biotechnol. 26:69-72.
19. He X, Qian W, Wang Z, Li Y, Zhang J. 2010. Prevalent positive epistasis in Eschericia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic networks. Nat Genet. 42:272-278.
20. Jovelin R, Phillips PC. 2009. Evolutionary rates and centrality in the yeast gene regulatory network. Genome Biol. 10:R35.
21. Khan A, Dinh D, Schneider D, Lenski R, Cooper T. 2011. Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Science 332:1193-1196.
22. Landry CR, Lemos B, Rifkin SA, Dickinson WJ, Hartl DL. 2007. Genetic properties influencing the evolvability of gene expression. Science 317: 118-121.
23. Lee W, et al. 2007. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet. 39:1235-1244.
24. Lehner B, 2010a. Conflict between noise and plasticity in yeast. PLoS Genet. 6: e1001185.
25. Lehner B, 2010b. Genes confer similar robustness to environmental, stochastic, and genetic perturbations in yeast. PLoS One 5: e9035.
26. Masel J, Siegal ML. 2009. Robustness: mechanisms and consequences. Trends Genet. 25:395-403.
27. Michaut M, et al. 2011. Protein complexes are central in the yeast genetic landscape. PLoS Comput Biol. 7:e1001092.
28. Nagalakshmi U, et al. 2008. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 320:1344-1349.
29. Newman JRS, et al. 2006. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441:840-846.
30. Phillips PC. 2008. Epistasis-the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat Rev Genet. 9: 855-867.
31. Phillips PC, Otto SP, Whitlock MC. 2000. Beyond the average. The evolutionary importance of gene interactions and variability of epistatic effects. In: Wolf JB, Brodie ED III, Wade MJ, editors. Epistasis and the evolutionary process. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. p. 20-38.
32. Podder S, Ghosh TC. 2010. Exploring the differences in evolutionary rates between monogenic and polygenic disease genes in human. Mol Biol Evol. 27:934-941.
33. Proulx SR, Nuzhdin S, Promislow DEL. 2007. Direct selection on genetic robustness revealed in the yeast transcriptome. PLoS One 2:e911.
34. Proulx SR, Promislow DEL, Phillips PC. 2005. Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:345-353.
35. Ratcliff W, Denison R, Borrello M, Travisano M. 2012. Experimental evolution of multicellularity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:1599-1600.
36. Rifkin S, Houle D, Kim J, White K. 2005. A mutation accumulation assay reveals a broad capacity for rapid evolution of gene expression. Nature 438:220-223.
37. Stinchcombe JR, Agrawal AF, Hohenlohe PA, Arnold SJ, BlowsMW. 2008. Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing? Evolution 62:2435-2440.
38. Szappanos B, et al. 2011. An integrated approach to characterize genetic interaction networks in yeast metabolism. Nat Genet. 43: 656-662.
39. Tirosh I, Barkai N. 2008a. Evolution of gene sequence and gene expression are not correlated in yeast. Trends Genet. 24:109-113.
40. Tirosh I, Barkai N. 2008b. Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. Genome Res. 18: 1084-1091.
41. Tirosh I, Barkai N, Verstrepen K. 2009. Promoter architecture and the evolvability of gene expression. J Biol. 8:95.
42. Tirosh I, Reikhav S, Levy A, Barkai N. 2009. A yeast hybrid provides insight into the evolution of gene expression regulation. Science 324: 659-662.
43. Tirosh I, Reikhav S, Sigal N, Assia Y, Barkai N. 2010. Chromatin regulators as capacitors of interspecies variations in gene expression. Mol Syst Biol. 6:1-9.
44. Tirosh I, Weinberger A, Carmi M, Barkai N. 2006. A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression. Nat Genet. 38:830-834.
45. Tsankov AM, Thompson DA, Socha A, Regev A, Rando OJ. 2010. The role of nucleosome positioning in the evolution of gene regulation. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000414.
46. Vizeacoumar FJ, Chong Y, Boone C, Andrews BJ. 2009. A picture is worth a thousand words: genomics to phenomics in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 583:1656-1661.
47. Wall D, Hirsh A, Fraser H. 2005. Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102:5483-5488.
48. Wang Z, Zhang J. 2007. In search of the biological significance of modular structures in protein networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 3:e107.
49. Wolf JB, Brodie ED III, Wade MJ. 2000. Epistasis and the evolutionary process. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.