The influence of external variables on information technology usage behavior

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 4, Issue , 1996, Pages 166-175

  Hubona, G S ^a   Kennick, E ^b  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MORGAN STANLEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; END-USER APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY USAGES; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; TAM MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER ACCEPTANCE;

SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

EID: 85020610979     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.1996.495323     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R. and Todd, P.A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16:3, 227-247.
2. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29:5, 530-545.
4. Benbasat, I. (1990). Laboratory experiments in information systems studies with a focus on individuals: A critical appraisal. In Izak Benbasat, Ed. The Information Systems Research Challenge: Experimental Research Methods. Vol. 2. pp. 37-47. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
5. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
6. Czara, S.J., Hammond, K., Blascovich, J.J. and Swede, H. (1989). Age related differences in learning to use a text-editing system. Behavior and Information Technology, 8:4, 309-319.
7. Dambrot, F.H., Silling, S.M. and Zook, A. (1988). Psychology of computer use: Sex differences in prediction of course grades in a computer language course. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66:2, 627-636.
8. Davis, F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results, doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
9. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13:2, 319-339.
10. Davis, F.D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
11. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35:8, 982-1003.
12. Davis, F.D. and Venkatesh, V. (1995). Measuring user acceptance of emerging information technologies: An assessment of possible method biases. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Volume IV, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 729-736.
13. Davis, L.D. and Davis, F.D. (1990). The effect of training techniques and personal characteristics on training end users of information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7:2, 93-110.
14. Delone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information System Research, 3:1, 60-95.
15. Dickson, G.W., Benbasat, I. and King, W.R. (1980). The management information systems area: Problems, challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, 1-7.
16. Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12:2, 259-274.
17. Egan, D.E., and Gomez, L.M. (1985). Assaying, isolating and accommodating individual differences in learning a complex skill. Individual Differences in Cognition, Vol. 2, Ed. R. Dillon. New York: Academie Press.
18. ElWton, J. and Williges, R.C. (1984). Information retrieval strategies in a file-search environment. Human Factors, 26:2, 171-184.
19. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1977). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 23, 487-544.
20. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
21. Gomez, L.M., Egan, D.E. and Bowers, C. (1986). Learning to use a text editor: Some learner characteristics that predict success." Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1-23.
22. Greene, S.L., Gomez, L.M., and Devlin, S.J. A cognitive analysis of database query production. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, pp. 9-13.
23. Harrison, A.W. and Rainer, R.K. Jr. (1992). The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9:1, 93-111.
24. Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40:4, 440-465.
25. Hendrickson, A.R., Massey, P.D. and Cronan, T.P. (1993). On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly, 17:3, 227-230.
26. Howard, R.A. (1988). Decision analysis: Practice and promise. Management Science, 34:6, 679-695.
27. Igbaria, M. and Parasuraman, S. (1989). A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety, and attitudes towards microcomputers. Journal of Management, 15:3, 373-388.
28. Ives, B. and Olson, M.H. (1984). User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Management Science, 30:5,586-603.
29. Ives, B., Olson, M.H. and Baroudi, J.J. (1983). The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26:10,785-793.
30. Jarvenpaa. S., Dickson, G.W. and DeSanctis, G. (1985). Methodological issues in experimental IS research: Experiences and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 9:2, 141-156.
31. Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 User's Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software Inc.
32. Keen, P. (1980). MIS research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, 9-18.
33. Levin, T. and Gordon, C. (1989). Effect of gender and computer experience on attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5:1, 69-88.
34. Lucas, H.C. (1978). Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementation. MIS Quarterly, 2:2, 27-52.
35. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2:3,173-191.
36. Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2:3,192-222.
37. Raub, A.C. (1981). Correlates of computer anxiety in college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
38. Rosson, M.B. (1983). Patterns of experience in text editing. Proceedings of the CHI'83 Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 171-175.
39. Segars, A.H. and Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17:4,517-525.
40. Singley, M.K. and Anderson, J.R. (1979). The transfer of text editing skill. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22,403-423.
41. Subramanian, G.H. (1995). A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decision Sciences, 25, 863-874.
42. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1994). Modeling the determinants of perceived ease of use. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, B.C., 213-227.
43. Wheaton, B.B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D.F. and Summers, G.F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D.R. Heise, Ed. Sociological Methodology 1977. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. Zmud, R.W. (1979). Individual differences and MIS success: A review of the empirical literature. Management Science, 25:10, 966-979.