Diversity and High Academic Expectations Without Tracking: Inclusively Responsive Instruction

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 312-335

  Murata, Aki ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875869269     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2012.682188     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Angier, C. and Povey, H. 1999. One teacher and a class or school students: Their perception of the culture of their mathematics classroom and its construction. Educational Review, 51(2): 147-160.
2. Aukerman, M. 2007. When reading it wrong is getting it right. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1): 56-103.
3. Ball, D. and Bass, H. 2000. "Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach? Knowing and using mathematics". In Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics, Edited by: Boaler, J. 83-104. Westport, CT: Ablex.
4. Ball, D., Hill, H. and Bass, H. 2005. Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?. American Educator, 29(3): 14-22. 43-46.
5. Barton, A. C. and Tan, E. 2009. Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1): 50-73.
6. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D. and Vye, N. 2007. Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19: 363-392. The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt doi:1-1080/08839510590910200
7. Boaler, J. 2002. Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning, New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Boaler, J. 2006. How a detracked mathematics approach promoted respect, responsibility, and high achievement. Theory Into Practice, 45(1): 40-46.
9. Boaler, J. 2008. Promoting "relational equity" and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2): 167-194.
10. Bourke, S. 1986. How smaller is better: Some relationships between class size, teaching practices, and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23: 558-571.
11. Brown, A. L. and Campione, J. C. 1996. "Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems". In Innovation in learning: New environments for education, Edited by: Schauble, L. and Glaser, R. 289-325. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Brown, A. L. and Palincsar, A. S. 1987. "Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning". In Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions in theory, assessment and instructional practices, Edited by: Day, J. and Borkowski, J. 81-132. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Burris, C. C., Heubert, J. P. and Levin, H. M. 2006. Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 43: 105-136.
14. Cobb, P. 1994. Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7): 13-20.
15. Cobb, P. and Bower, J. 1999. Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2): 4-15.
16. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K. and Gravemeijer, K. 2001. Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1/2): 113-163.
17. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Mathematics standards. http://www.corestandards.org (http://www.corestandards.org)
18. Confrey, J. 1990. "A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming". In Review of Research in Education, 16 3-56.
19. Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L. and Campione, J. C. 1986. Children's learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: Studies of proximal development. Child Development, 57: 1087-1099.
20. Finn, J. D. and Achilles, C. M. 1999. Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. American Education Research Journal, 21(2): 97-109.
21. Forman, E. A., Mccormick, D. E., & Donato, R. (1997). Learning what counts as a mathematical explanation. Linguistics and Education, 9, 313-339.
22. Fuson, K. and Murata, A. 2007. Integrating the NRC principles and the NCTM process standards: Cognitively guided teaching to individualize instruction within whole-class activities and move all students within their learning paths. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Journal, 10(1): 72-90.
23. Publication, Gakkotosho. 2009. Study with your friends: Mathematics for elementary school, Tokyo, Japan: Author.
24. Greeno, J. 1997. On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1): 5-17.
25. Greeno, J. 1998. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53: 5-26. the Middle School Mathematics Through Application Project Group
26. Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B. and Larson, J. 1995. Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus. Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65: 445-472.
27. Hatano, G. 1993. "Time to merge Vygotskiian and constructivist conceptions of knowledge acquisition". In Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development, Edited by: Forman, E. A., Minick, N. and Stone, C. A. 153-166. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Holloway, S. 1988. Concepts of ability and effort in Japan and the United States. Review of Educational Research, 58: 327-345.
29. Mifflin, Houghton. 2006. Math expressions, Boston, MA: Author.
30. Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C. and Sherin, M. G. 2004. Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2): 81-116.
31. Kaput, J. J. (1986). Information technology and mathematics: Opening new representational windows. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 187-207.
32. Lehman, S. 2001. Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46: 87-113.
33. Lewis, C. 1995. Educating hearts and minds, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: Research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education. American Educator, Winter, 12, 14-17, 50-52.
35. Ma, L. 1999. Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Michaels, S., O'Connor, C. and Resnick, L. B. 2007. Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27: 283-297.
37. Moje, E. B., Ciehanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, S., Carrillo, R. and Collazo, T. 2004. Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1): 38-70.
38. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D. and Gonzalez, N. 1992. Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2): 132-141.
39. Murata, A. 2004. Paths to learning ten-structured understanding of teen sums: Addition solution methods of Japanese Grade 1 students. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2): 185-218.
40. Murata, A. 2008. Mathematics teaching and learning as a mediating process: The case of tape diagrams. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10: 374-406.
41. Murata, A. 2011a. [Classroom mathematics teaching in elementary schools], Unpublished raw data.
42. Murata, A. and Murata, A. 2011b. "Conceptual overview of lesson study: Introduction". In Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together, Edited by: Hart, L. and Alston, A. 1-12. New York, NY: Springer.
43. Murata, A. and Fuson, K. C. 2006. Teaching as assisting individual constructive paths within an interdependent class learning zone: Japanese first graders learning to add using ten. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37: 421-456.
44. Murata, A., Otani, N., Hattori, N. and Fuson, K. C. 2004. "The NCTM standards in a Japanese primary classroom: Valuing students' diverse ideas and learning paths". In National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2004 yearbook: Perspectives on the teaching of mathematics, Edited by: Rubenstein, R. 82-95. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
45. National Center for Education Statistics. 2003. Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study, Washington, DC: Author.
46. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2006. Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through Grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence, Reston, VA: Author.
47. Oakes, J. 1985. Keeping track: How schools structure inequality, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48. Oakes, J., Wells, A. S., Jones, M. and Datnow, A. 1997. Detracking: The social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record, 98: 482-510.
49. Osterman, K. F. 2000. Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70: 323-367.
50. Palincsar, A. 1998. Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 49: 345-375.
51. Palincsar, A. and Brown, A. L. 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1: 117-176.
52. Putnum, H. 1988. Representation and reality, Cambridge, England: Bradford Books.
53. Resnick, L. B. 2010. Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39(3): 183-197.
54. Rogoff, B., Radziszewska, B. and Masiello, T. 1995. "Analysis of developmental processes in sociocultural activity". In Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice of doing and knowing, Edited by: Martin, L., Nelson, K. and Toback, E. 125-149. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55. Saxe, G. 1991. Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C. and Raizens, S. A. 1997. A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education, Boston, MA: Kluwer.
57. Schoenfeld, A. 1988. When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of "well taught" mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23(2): 145-166.
58. Slavin, R. E. 1987. Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57: 293-336.
59. Stevenson, J. and Stigler, J. 1992. Learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
60. Stigler, J. and Hiebert, J. 1999. Teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom, New York, NY: Free Press.
61. Tomlinson, C. A. 1999a. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
62. Tomlinson, C. A. 1999b. Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1): 12-16.
63. U.S. Department of Education. 2008. Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel, Jessup, MD: Author.
64. Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Watson, M., Ecken, L. and Kohn, A. 2003. Learning to trust: Transforming difficult elementary classrooms through developmental discipline, Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
66. Webb, N. M. 1982. Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52: 421-445.
67. White, M. 1985. The Japanese educational challenge: A commitment to children, New York, NY: Free Press.