When reading it wrong is getting it right: Shared evaluation pedagogy among struggling fifth grade readers

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 56-103

  Aukerman, Maren S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547868483     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ALLINGTON, R. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. New York: Longman.
2. ALMASI, J. F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351.
3. ALMASI, J. F., O'FLAHAVAN, J. F., & ARYA, P. (2001). A comparative analysis of student and teacher development in more and less proficient discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 96-120.
4. ALVERMANN, D. E., O'BRIEN, D. G., & DILLON, D. R. (1990). What teachers do when they say they're having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 296-322.
5. ANDERSON, R., & PEARSON, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), The handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
6. APPLEBEE, A. N., LANGER, J. A., NYSTRAND, M., & GAMORAN, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685-730.
7. BAKHTIN, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination (pp. 259-492). Austin: University of Texas Press.
8. BALL, D. (1991). What's all this talk about discourse? Arithmetic Teacher, 39(3), 44-48.
9. BALLENGER, C. (2004). Reading storybooks with young children: The case of The Three Robbers. In C. Ballenger (Ed.), Regarding children's words: Teacher research on language and literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. BECK, I., & McKEOWN, M. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55, 10-20.
11. BECK, I., McKEOWN, M., HAMILTON, R., & KUCAN, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12. BENNETT, T. (1985). Texts in history: The determinations of reading and their texts. Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 18, 1-16.
13. BERRY, M. (1981). Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in discourse analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14. BOURDIEU, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487-511). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. BOURDIEU, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. BRITSCH, S. (2004). "Riddle me this, riddle me that": Genre as counterscript and the multiple spaces of dialogue. Language Arts, 81, 214-222.
17. BRITTON, J. (1970). Language and learning. Baltimore: Pelican Books.
18. BRUNER, J. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2, 1-40.
19. CANDELA, A. (1999). Students' power in classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education, 10, 139-163.
20. CAZDEN, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
21. CAZDEN, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. CHINN, C. A., ANDERSON, R. C., & WAGGONER, M. A. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378-411.
23. CLARK, K. F., & GRAVES, M. F. (2005). Scaffolding students' comprehension of text. The Reading Teacher, 58, 570-680.
24. DREW, P., & HERITAGE, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. DUKE, N., & PEARSON, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
26. DYSON, A. (1990). Weaving possibilities: Rethinking metaphors for early literacy development. The Reading Teacher, 44, 202-213.
27. DYSON, A. (1993). Social works of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
28. DYSON, A. (2002). The brothers and the sisters learn to write: Popular literacies in childhood and school cultures. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. DYSON, A., & GENISHI, C. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. FAIRCLOUGH, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.
31. FISH, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32. GOLDENBERG, C. (1992/1993). Instructional conversations: Promoting comprehension through discussion. The Reading Teacher, 46, 316-326.
33. GOODWIN, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 272-302.
34. HERITAGE, J. (1984). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35. HINCHMAN, K. A., & YOUNG, J. P. (2001). Speaking but not being heard: Two adolescents negotiate classroom talk about text. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 243-268.
36. HORN, I. S. (1999, April). Accountable argumentation as a participant structure to support learning through disagreement. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Quebec.
37. HULL, G., & ROSE, M. (1990). "This wooden shack place": The logic of an unconventional reading. College Composition and Communication, 41, 287-298.
38. KASZA, K. (1987). The wolf's chicken stew. New York: Putnam & Grosset.
39. KONG, A., & FITCH, E. (2002/2003). Using book club to engage culturally and linguistically diverse learners in reading, writing, and talking about books. The Reading Teacher, 56(4), 352-362.
40. KONG, A., & PEARSON, P. D. (2003). The road to participation: The construction of a literacy practice in a learning community of linguistically diverse learners. Research in the Teaching of English, 38, 85-124.
41. LAMPERT, M., RITTENHOUSE, P., & CRUMBAUGH, C. (1996). Agreeing to disagree: Developing sociable mathematical discourse. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning; teaching and schooling (pp. 731-764). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
42. LAVE, J., & WENGER, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. LEWIS, C. (1993). "Give people a chance": Acknowledging social differences in reading. Language Arts, 70, 454-461.
44. LUKE, A. (1996). Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 308-338). New York: Longman.
45. MARKEE, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. McCORMICK, K. (1994). The culture of reading and the teaching of English. Manchester, NY: Manchester University Press.
47. McMAHON, S. I. (1997). Book clubs: Contexts for students to lead their own discussions. In S. I. McMahon & T. E. Raphael (Eds.), The book club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk (pp. 89-106). New York: Teachers College Press.
48. MEHAN, H. (1982). The structure of classroom events and their consequences for student performance. In P. Gilmore (Ed.), Children in and out of school. Center for Applied Linguistics.
49. MERCER, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Bristol, PA: Multilingual Matters.
50. NEW LONDON GROUP. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 66(1), 60-92.
51. NICHOLLS, J. G., & HAZZARD, S. P. (1993). Education as adventure: Lessons from the second grade. New York: Teachers College Press.
52. NYSTRAND, M. (1997). Dialogic instruction: When recitation becomes conversation. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
53. PALINCSAR, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1 & 2), 73-98.
54. PALINCSAR, A. S., & BROWN, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
55. PEARSON, P. D., & GALLAGHER, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317-344.
56. PINKNEY, J. (2000). Aesop's fables. New York: SeaStar Books.
57. POOLE, D. (1990). Contextualizing IRE in an eighth-grade quiz review. Linguistics and Education, 2, 185-211.
58. PRESSLEY, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
59. PROBST, R. (1984). Adolescent literature: Response and analysis. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
60. RABINOWITZ, P. J., & SMITH, M. W. (1998). Authorizing readers: Resistance and respect in the teaching of literature. New York: Teachers College Press.
61. RAND READING STUDY GROUP. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Arlington, VA: RAND.
62. ROGOFF, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
63. ROSEN, C. (1967). All in the day's work. In J. Britton (Ed.), Talking and writing. London: Methuen.
64. ROSENBLATT, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
65. ROSENBLATT, L. (1989). Writing and reading: The transactional theory. In J. Mason (Ed.), Reading and writing connections. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
66. RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 3-26). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
67. SEARLE, D. (1984). Scaffolding: Who's building whose building? Language Arts, 61, 480-483.
68. SMAGORINSKY, P. (2001). If meaning is constructed, what's it made from? Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 133-169.
69. STRAUSS, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
70. TIERNEY, R. J., & PEARSON, P. D. (1981). Learning to learn from text: A framework for improving classroom practice. In E. K. Dishner, J. E. Readence, & T. W. Bean (Eds.), Reading in the content areas: Improving classroom instruction. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
71. VAUGHN, S., KLINGNER, J. K., & BRYANT, D. P. (2001). Collaborative strategic reading as a means to enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading comprehension and content-area learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 66-74.
72. VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
73. WEINSTEIN, R. (2002). Reaching higher: The power of expectations in schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74. WIGGINS, G., & MCTIGHE, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
75. WOOD, D., BRUNER, J., & ROSS, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.