Graphemic parsing and the basic orthographic syllable structure

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 355-376

  Perry, Conrad ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Orthographic representations; Reading; Syllables

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SPEECH ARTICULATION; VOWEL;

EID: 84875855122     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.641386     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andrews, S. and Bond, R. 2008. Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity. Reading and Writing, 22: 687-711.
2. Ans, B., Carbonnel, S. and Valdois, S. 1998. A connectionist multiple-trace memory model of polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105: 678-723.
3. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. 1993. The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
4. Chateau, D. and Jared, D. 2003. Spelling-sound consistency effects in disyllabic word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48: 255-280.
5. Chen, H. C. and Vaid, J. 2007. Word frequency modulates the Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) effect in English polysyllable word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22: 58-82.
6. Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., Tamm, S. and Jacobs, A. M. 2009. Syllables and bigrams: Orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35: 461-479.
7. Conrad, M., Tamm, S., Carreiras, M. and Jacobs, M. 2010. Simulating syllable frequency effects within an interactive activation framework. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22: 861-893.
8. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R. and Perea, M. 2008. The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115: 577-600.
9. Grainger, J. and Jacobs, A. M. 1996. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103: 518-565.
10. Hall, T. A. 2006. English syllabification as the interaction of markedness constraints. Studia Linguistica, 60: 1-33.
11. Hammond, M. 1999. The phonology of English. A prosodic optimality-theoretic approach, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Kello, C. T. 2006. "Considering the junction model of lexical processing". In From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing, Edited by: Andrews, S. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
13. MacKay, D. 1971. The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 3: 210-227.
14. McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. 1996. Prosodic morphology 1986 (Technical Report #32). Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, Piscataway, NJ.
15. Perea, M. and Acha, J. 2009. Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130: 127-137.
16. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. 2004. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51: 231-246.
17. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., Braun, M. and Zorzi, M. 2010. Rules versus statistics in reading aloud: New evidence on an old debate. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5: 798-812.
18. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C. and Coltheart, M. 2002. A dissociation between orthographic awareness and spelling production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23: 43-73.
19. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C. and Zorzi, M. 2010. Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP ++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61: 106-151.
20. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C. and Zorzi, M. 2007. Nested modeling and strong inference testing in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 27: 301-333.
21. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S. and Patterson, K. 1996. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103: 56-115.
22. Rouibah, A. and Taft, M. 2001. The role of syllabic structure in French visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 29: 373-381.
23. Seidenberg, M. S. and McClelland, J. L. 1989. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96: 523-568.
24. Taft, M. 1992. The body of the BOSS: Sub-syllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18: 1004-1014.
25. Taft, M. 1979. Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllable Structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18: 21-39.
26. Taft, M. 2001. Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech, 44: 351-376.
27. Treiman, R., Gross, J. and Cwikiel-Glavin, A. 1992. The syllabification of /s/ clusters in English. Journal of Phonetics, 20: 383-402.
28. Ziegler, J. C., Besson, M., Jacobs, A. M., Nazir, T. A. and Carr, T. H. 1997. Word, pseudoword, and nonword processing: A multitask comparison using event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9: 758-775.
29. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G. and Butterworth, B. 1998. Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24: 1131-1161.