The Familiar as a key-concept in regulating the social and affective dimensions of HRI

IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 234-241

  Baddoura, Ritta ^a   Venture, Gentiane ^b   Matsukata, Ryo ^a  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMOTIONAL STATE; PRECISE DEFINITION; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE;

EXPERIMENTS;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS;

EID: 84875747650     PISSN: 21640572     EISSN: 21640580     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2012.6651526     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. E.-J. Lee, "Flattery may get computers somewhere, sometimes: The moderating role of output modality, computer gender, and user gender, " Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 66, pp. 789-800, 2008.
2. S. Turkle, "A nascent robotics culture: New complicities for companionship, " AAAI Technical Report Series, 2006.
3. N. Lee and et al., "Utilitarian vs. hedonic robots, role of parasocial tendency and anthropomorphism in shaping user attitudes, " Proc. Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 183-184, 2011.
4. K. Fischer, "Interpersonal variation in understanding robots as social actors, " Proc. Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 53-60, 2011.
5. M. Walters and et al., "Human approach distances to a mechanicallooking robot with different robot voice styles, " Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 707-712, 2008.
6. I. Fanaswala and et al., "Interactional disparities in english and arabic native speakers with a bi-lingual robot receptionist, " Proc. Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction, 2011.
7. E. Takano and et al., "Psychological effects on interpersonal communication by bystander android using motions based on human-like needs, " Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3721-3726, 2009.
8. L. Hall and et al., "Designing empathic agents: Adults vs. kids, " Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 125-126, 2004.
9. L. Canamero, "Playing the emotion game with feelix: What can a lego robot tell us about emotion?" Socially intelligent agents: Creating relationships with computers and robots, pp. 69-76, 2002.
10. B. Joy, "Why the future doesn't need us, " Wired 8.04 Magazine, April 2000.
11. A. Sabelli and et al., "A conversational robot in an elderly care center, an ethnographic study, " Int. Conf. on Human- Robot Interaction, pp. 37-44, 2011.
12. R. Zajonc, "Attitudinal effects of mere exposure, " J. of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 9, no. 2, 1968.
13. R. Miller, "Mere exposure, psychological reactance and attitude change, " J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology, no. 59, pp. 1-9, 1976.
14. S. Freud, "The uncanny (das unheimliche, 1919), " Penguin Books, Limited, UK, 2005.
15. E. Jentsch, "On the psychology of the uncanny (zur psychologie des unheimlichen), " Psychiatrisch-Neurologische Wochenschrift, pp. 195- 198, 1906.
16. M. Mori, "Bukimi no tani (the uncanny valley), " Energy, pp. 33-35, 1970.
17. D. Hebb, "A textbook of psychology, " 1958.
18. H. Brenton and et al., "The uncanny valley: Does it exist?" Proc. Conf. Human Computer Interaction, Workshop on Human Animated Character Interaction, 2005.
19. K. MacDorman and H. Ishiguro, "The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research, " Interaction Studies, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 297-337, 2006.
20. C. Bethal and R. Murphy, "Affective expression in appearance- constrained robots, " Proc. ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conf. Human Robot Interaction, pp. 327-328, 2006. (Pubitemid 44032426)
21. D. Hanson and et al., "Upending the uncanny valley, " Proc. AAII Conf. Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition, 2005.
22. E. Hess, "Imprinting" in animals, " Psychobiology: The Biological Basis of Behaviour, pp. 107-112, 1958.
23. D. Gillespie and A. Leffler, "Theories of non-verbal behaviour: A critical review of proxemics research, " Sociological Theory, vol. 1, pp. 120-154, 1983.
24. A. Powers and S. Kiesler, "The advisor robot: Tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes, " Proc. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 218-225, 2006. (Pubitemid 44032410)
25. A. Powers and et al., "Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot, " Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 158-163, 2005. (Pubitemid 44144376)
26. F. Eyssel and et al., "Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study, " Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 681-686, 2010.
27. E. Park and et al., "The effect of robot's behaviour vs. appearance on communication with humans, " Int. Conf. Human- Robot Interaction, pp. 219-220, 2011.
28. N. Epley and et al., "On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism, " Psychological Rev., vol. 114, pp. 864-886, 2007.
29. H. Luczak, M. Retting, and L. Schmidt, "Let's talk: Anthropomorphization as means to cope with stress of interacting with technical devices, " Ergonomics, vol. 46, pp. 1361-1374, 2003. (Pubitemid 37461133)
30. F. Eyssel and et al., "Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism, " Proc. Int. Conf. Human- Robot Interaction, pp. 61-67, 2011.
31. P. Hinds and et al., "Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task, " Human Computer Interaction, pp. 151-181, 2004.
32. S. Cowley and T. Kanda, "Friendly machines: interaction-oriented robots today and tomorrow, " Alternation, 2005.