Genetic learning of virtual team member preferences

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1787-1798

  Pendharkar, Parag C ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithms; Inter agent communication; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS; GENETIC LEARNING; INTER-AGENT COMMUNICATIONS; TEAM COORDINATION; TEAM MEMBERS; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES; VIRTUAL TEAM;

DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84875742221     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. C.J. Aart, B. Wielinga, and G. Schreiber Organizational building blocks for design of distributed intelligent system International Journal of Human Computer Studies 61 2004 567 599
2. A.H. Anderson, R. McEwan, J. Bal, and J. Carletta Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context Computers in Human Behavior 23 2007 2558 2580 (Pubitemid 46483997)
3. D. Ballard, and M. Waller All in the timing considering time at multiple stages of group research Small Group Research 39 2008 328 335
4. M. Barbati, G. Bruno, and A. Genovese Applications of agent-based models for optimizatioin problems: A literature review Expert Systems with Applications 39 2012 6020 6028
5. F. Bélanger, and M.B. Watson-Manheim Virtual teams and multiple media: Structuring media use to attain strategic goals Group Decision and Negotiation 15 2006 299 321 (Pubitemid 44086352)
6. A. Benhassine, and T.B. Ho An agent-based approach to solve dynamic meeting scheduling problems with preferences Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 20 2007 857 873 (Pubitemid 46962285)
7. F. Berger, R. Klein, D. Nussbaum, J.-R. Sack, and J. Yi A meeting scheduling problem respecting time and space Geoinformatica 13 2009 453 481
8. R.S. Blackburn, S.A. Furst, and B. Rosen Building a winning virtual team C. Gibson, S. Cohen, Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for effective virtual teams 2003 Jossey Bass San Francisco, CA 95 120
9. Briggs, R. O., Vreede, G. J., Nunamaker, J. F., David, T. H. (2001). Thinklets: Achieving predictable patterns of group interaction with group support systems. In Proceedings of 34th hawaii international conference on system sciences. January 3-6, 2001. 6 p.
10. H. Bui, H.S. Venkatesh, and D. Kieronska Learning other agents' preferences in multi-agent negotiation using the Bayesian classifier International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 8 1999 275 293
11. K. Chari, and M. Agrawal Multi-issue automated negotiations using agents INFORMS Journal on Computing 19 2007 588 595
12. A. Chun, H. Wai, and R.Y.M. Wong Optimizing agent-based meeting scheduling through preference estimation Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 16 2003 727 743
13. G. Doherty-Sneddon, A.H. Anderson, C. O'Malley, S. Langton, S. Garrod, and V. Bruce Face-to-face interaction and video mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and co-operative task performance Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice 7 4 1997 297 323
14. Z-.P. Fan Trust estimation in a virtual team: A decision support method Expert Systems with Applications 38 2011 10240 10251
15. J. Gluckler, and G. Schrott Leadership and performance in virtual teams: Exploring brokerage in electronic communication International Journal of e-Collaboration 3 3 2007 31 52
16. D.E. Goldberg, and K. Deb A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms G. Rawlins, Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 1991 Morgan Kaufmann San Mateo, CA 47 56
17. A. Gupta, I. Crk, and R. Bondade Leveraging temporal and spatial separations with the 24-h knowledge factory paradigm Information Systems Frontiers 13 2011 397 405
18. D.E. Hinkle, W. Wiersma, and S.G. Jurs Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. 1988 Houghton Mifflin Company Boston
19. S.L. Jarvenpaa, and D.E. Leidner Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams Journal of Management Science 14 1999 29 64
20. T. Kayworth, and D. Leidner The global virtual manager: A prescription for success European Management Journal 18 2 2000 183 194
21. Klitmoller, A., & Lauring, J. (in press). When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultutal difference and language commonality. Journal of World Business, Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ journal/aip/10909516.
22. Landgren, J. (2006). Making action visible in time-critical work. in Proceedings of the CHI (pp. 201-210). (Pubitemid 44032103)
23. Lee, C. -S., Wang, M. -H., Wu, M. -H., Hsu, C. -Y., Lin, Y. -C., & Yen, S. -J. (2010). A type-2 fuzzy personal ontology for meeting scheduling system. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (8 pp).
24. J. Lipnack, and J. Stamps Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time and organizations with technology 1997 Wiley New York
25. McLean, J. (2007). Managing global virtual teams. The British Journal of Administrative Management, Summer (pp. 16-16).
26. Niederer, M., & Schatten, A. (2009). Agent-based meeting scheduling support using mobile clients. In Proceedings of second international conference on the applications of digital information and web technologies (pp. 719-724).
27. B. O'Conaill, S. Whittaker, and S. Wilbur Conversations over videoconferences: An evaluation of video mediated interaction Human-Computer Interaction 8 1993 382 428
28. A. Ortiz de Guinea, J. Webster, and D.S. Staples A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning Information and Management 49 2012 301 308
29. F. Paas, and J.J.G. van Merrienboer Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks Educational Psychology Review 6 1994 51 71
30. P.C. Pendharkar Maximum entropy and least square error minimizing procedures for estimating missing conditional probabilities in Bayesian networks Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 52 7 2008 3583 3602
31. S.E. Poltrock, and G. Engelbeck Requirements for a virtual collocation environment Information and Software Technology 41 1999 331 339
32. Rigi, M. A., & Khoshalhan, F. (2010). Adaptive modeling of user's preferences in multi-agent meeting scheduling problem using analytical hierarchy process. In Proceedings of international conference on intelligent computer communication and processing (pp. 67-72).
33. S. Sen, and E.H. Durfee A formal study of distributed meeting scheduling Group Decision and Negotiation 7 1998 265 289
34. Shakshuki, E., Koo, H. -H., & Benoit, D. (2007). Negotiation strategies for agent-based meeting scheduling system. In Proceedings of international conference on information technology (pp. 637-642). (Pubitemid 47298527)
35. M.N. Sulaiman, T.E. Lai, M.H. Selamat, and Z. Muda Improving agent-based meeting scheduling through preference learning Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 6 3 2009 155 164
36. J. Sweller Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning Cognitive Science 12 1988 257 285
37. K. Swigger, M. Hoyt, F.C. Serce, V. Lopez, and F.N. Alpaslan The temporal communication behaviors of global software development student teams Computers in Human Behavior 28 2 2012 384 392 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.008
38. L. Thompson, and M. Couvert Teamwork online: The effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction and post discussion accuracy Group Dynamics 7 2003 135 151
39. A.S. Vivacqua, L.C. Marques, M.S. Ferreira, and J.M. De Souza Computational indicators to assist meeting facilitation Group Decision and Negotiation 20 2011 667 684
40. G.J. Vreede, R.M. Davidson, and R.O. Briggs How a silver bullet may lose its shine Communications of the ACM 46 2003 96 101
41. E. Zibetti, A. Chevalier, and R. Eyraud What type of information displayed on digital scheduling software facilitates reflective planning tasks for students? Contributions to the design of a school task management tool Computers in Human Behavior 28 2 2012 591 607 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.005