Adaptive modeling of user's preferences in multiagent meeting scheduling problem using analytical hierarchy process

Proceedings - 2010 IEEE 6th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing, ICCP10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 67-72

  Rigi, Mohammad Amin ^a   Khoshalhan, Farid ^a  

^a K N TOOSI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process; Meeting scheduling; Multi agent negotiation; Preference graph

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MODELING; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; MAKING DECISION; MEETING SCHEDULING; MULTI-AGENT; MULTIAGENT NEGOTIATION; PREFERENCE GRAPH;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; SCHEDULING;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 78650077635     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCP.2010.5606463     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Al-ani Hijaz, "A Survey: Multi-Agent Coordination in the Meeting-Scheduling Problem", Literature Review and Survey, School of computer science, University of Windsor, 2007.
2. Abdennadher S and Schlenker H, "Nurse scheduling using constraint logic programming." In: Proceedings of (IAAI), pp. 838-843, 1999.
3. Ephrati E, Zlotkin G, and Rosenschein J,"A Non-manipulable Meeting Scheduling System", proceedings of 13th International Distributed Artificial Intelligence Workshop, pp. 105-125, 1994.
4. Tsuruta T and Shintani T, "Scheduling meetings using distributed valued constraint satisfaction algorithm." Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 383-387, 2000.
5. Chun A, Wai H, and Wong R, "Optimizing agent-based meeting scheduling through preference estimation.", Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16(7), pp. 727-743, 2003.
6. BenHassine A, Ho T, and Ito T, "Meeting scheduling solver enhancement with local consistency reinforcement", International Journal of Applied Intelligence, 24(2) Springer, pp. 143-154, 2006.
7. Maheswaran R, Pearce J, Bowring E, Varakantham P, and Tambe M, "Privacy loss in distributed constraint reasoning: A quantitative framework for analysis and its applications.", Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (JAAMAS), pp. 27-60, 2006.
8. Mailler R and Lesser V, "A mediation based protocol for distributed constraint satisfaction", Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Distributed Constraint Reasoning, pp. 49-58, 2003.
9. Crawford E and Manuela Veloso. "Learning dynamic preferences in multi-agentmeeting scheduling", Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology(IAT),2005.
10. Crawford E and Veloso M, "Mechanism design for multi-agent meeting scheduling, including timepreferences, availability, and value of presence.", Proceedings of International Conference on IntelligentAgent Technology, 253-259, 2004.
11. Ephrati E, Zlotkin G, and Rosenschein J, "A Non-manipulable Meeting Scheduling System", proceedings of 13th International Distributed Artificial Intelligence Workshop, pp. 105-125, 1996.
12. Crawford E, "Learning to improve negotiation in semi-cooperative agreement problem", Phd thesis, School of computer science, Carnegie Melon University, May 2009.
13. Saaty T.L., Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw Hill, New York, 2009.
14. Cogger K.O, Yu P.L., Eigen weight vectors and least distance approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratio. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol 46,pp. 483-491, 1985.
15. Sen S, Haynes T, and Arora N (1997), Satisfying User Preferences While Negotiating Meetings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47, 407-415.