Agent-based meeting scheduling support using mobile clients

2nd International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies, ICADIWT 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 719-724

  Niederer, Markus ^a   Schatten, Alexander ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT BASED; MEETING SCHEDULING; MEETING SCHEDULING SYSTEMS; MOBILE AGENT SYSTEM; MOBILE CLIENT; MULTI-AGENT; OUTSOURCE; SCHEDULING SERVICE; TIME PREFERENCES; TIME SLOTS;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS; MOBILE AGENTS; MOBILE COMPUTING; MOBILE DEVICES; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; SCHEDULING;

WIRELESS NETWORKS;

EID: 71449088736     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICADIWT.2009.5273904     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. P. M. Berry, C. Albright, E. Bowring, K. Conley, K. Nitz, J. P. Pearce, B. Peintner, S. Saadati, M. Tambe, T. Uribe, and N. Yorke-Smith. Conflict negotiation among personal calendar agents. In AAMAS '06: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 1467-1468, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
2. M. Brzozowski, K. Carattini, S. R. Klemmer, P. Mihelich, J. Hu, and A. Y. Ng. grouptime: preference based group scheduling. In CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 1047-1056, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
3. F. Calefato, F. Lanubile, and M. Scalas. Porting a distributed meeting system to the eclipse communication framework. In eclipse '07: Proceedings of the 2007 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange, pages 46-49, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
4. A. Chun, H. Wai, and R. Wong. Optimizing agent-based meeting scheduling through preference estimation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16:727-743(17), October 2003.
5. E. Crawford and M. Veloso. Opportunities for learning in multi-agent meeting scheduling. In Proceedings of the Fall AAAI Symposium on Artificial Multiagent Learning, Washington, DC, October 2004.
6. E. Crawford and M. Veloso. Learning dynamic preferences in multi-agent meeting scheduling. In IAT '05: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, pages 487-490, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society.
7. M. T. Gervasio, M. D. Moffitt, M. E. Pollack, J. M. Taylor, and T. E. Uribe. Active preference learning for personalized calendar scheduling assistance. In IUI '05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 90-97, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
8. A. B. Hassine and T. B. Ho. An agent-based approach to solve dynamic meeting scheduling problems with preferences. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 20(6):857-873, 2007.
9. IBM Corporation. Lotus notes. IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA, 2005.
10. Internet Engineering Task Force. Extensible messaging and presence protocol (xmpp): Core, October 2004.
11. Microsoft Corporation. Outlook. Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052-7329, USA, 2007.
12. E. Mynatt and J. Tullio. Inferring calendar event attendance. In IUI '01: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 121-128, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press.
13. S. Sen and E. Durfee. On the design of an adaptive meet-ing scheduler. Artificial Intelligence for Applications, 1994., Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on, pages 40-46, Mar 1994.
14. J. Tullio, J. Goecks, E. D. Mynatt, and D. H. Nguyen. Augmenting shared personal calendars. In UIST '02: Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 11-20, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.
15. J. Wainer, J. Paulo Roberto Ferreira, and E. R. Constantino. Scheduling meetings through multi-agent negotiations. Decis. Support Syst., 44(1):285-297, 2007.