Fishery management advice with ecosystem considerations

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 471-479

  Lassen, Hans ^a   Pedersen, Søren Anker ^a   Frost, Hans ^b   Hoff, Ayoe ^b  

^a ICES Secretariat ^*  (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bioeconomic modelling; Eastern Baltic cod; Ecosystem approach; Fishery management

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CALIBRATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; EUROPEAN UNION; FOOD WEB; GADOID FISHERY; MARINE POLICY; OVERFISHING; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; STOCK IDENTIFICATION;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA;

GADUS CALLARIAS;

EID: 84875709521     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fss208     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. AER. 2009. The 2009 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. STECF-09-11, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Ed. by J. Anderson, and J. Guillen. European Union.
2. Andersen, K. P., and Ursin, E., 1977. A multispecies extension to the Beverton and Holt theory of fishing, with accounts of phosphorus circulation and primary production. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri-og Havundersogelser, N.S., 7: 319-435.
3. Biseau, A. 1998. Definition of fishing effort in a mixed-species trawl fishery, and its effect on stock assessment. Aquatic Living Resources, 11: 119-136. (Pubitemid 28356240)
4. Bogstad, B., Hiis Hauge, K., and Ulltang, Ø. 1997. MULTSPEC - a multi-species model for fish and marine mammals in the Barents Sea. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science, 22: 317-341.
5. Bren, P., Robinson, L. A., Rogers, S. I., Knights, A. M., Piet, G., Churilova, T., Margonski, P., et al. 2012. An environmental assessment of risk in achieving good environmental status to support regional prioritisation of management in Europe. Marine Policy, 36: 1033-1043.
6. Christensen, V., and Walters, C. J. 2004. Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecological Modelling, 172: 109-139. (Pubitemid 38231622)
7. Christensen, V., and Walters, C. J. 2011. Progress in the use of ecosystem modelling for fisheries management. In Ecosystem Approaches to Fisheries: A Global Perspective, pp. 189-205. Ed. by V. Christensen, and J. Maclean. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Christensen, V., Walters, C. J., and Pauly, D. 2005. Ecopath with Ecosim: A User's Guide. Fisheries Centre of University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 154 pp. The Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) software can be downloaded from http://www.ecopath.org/
9. Coll, M., Bundy, A., and Shannon, L. J. 2008. Ecosystem modeling using the Ecopath with Ecosim approach. In Computers in Fisheries Research, 2nd edn, pp. 225-291. Ed. by B. Megrey, and E. Moksness. Springer.
10. Collie, J. S., Gislason, H., and Vinther, M. 2003. Using AMOEBA to integrate multispecies, multifleet fisheries advice. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 60: 709-720. (Pubitemid 36872790)
11. Deutsch, B., and Berth, U. 2006. Differentiation of western and eastern Baltic Sea cod stocks (Gadus morhua) by means of stable isotope ratios in muscles and otoliths. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 538-539. (Pubitemid 44741529)
12. Diekmann, R., and Möllmann, C. (Ed.) 2010. Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of Seven Baltic Sea Areas Covering the Last Three Decades. ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 302. 90 pp.
13. EC (European Commission). 2008. Commission Regulation (EC) No 665/2008 of 14 July 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 concerning the establishment of a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy. EC, Brussels.
14. EC (European Commission). 2010. Commission Decision of 1 September 2010 on criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters. L 232/14 Official Journal of the European Union, 2.9.2010.
15. EEA (European Environment Agency). 2007. The DPSIR framework used by the EEA Copenhagen: European Environment Agency http://ia2dec.ew.eea.europa.eu/ knowledge-base/Frameworks/doc101182/
16. Eero, M., Koster, F. W., and Vinther, M. 2012. Why is the Eastern Baltic cod recovering? Marine Policy, 36: 235-240.
17. Eide, A., Skjold, F., Olsen, F., and Flåten, O. 2003. Harvest functions: the Norwegian bottom trawl cod fisheries. Marine Resource Economics, 18: 81-94. (Pubitemid 36540122)
18. EU CFP. 2002. Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) [COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2371/2002].
19. EU MSFD. 2008. Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) (Directive 2008/56/EC) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/marine/index-en.htm
20. FAO. 2003. Fisheries Management. The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries, No. 4 (Suppl. 2). 112 pp.
21. FAO SOFIA, 2010. The State ofWorld Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1820e/i1820e00.htm
22. Fulton, E. A. 2010. Approaches to end-to-end ecosystem models. Journal of Marine Systems, 81: 171-183.
23. Fulton, E. A., Parslow, J. S., Smith, A., and Johnson, C. R. 2004. Biogeochemical marine ecosystem models, II: the effect of physiological detail on model performance. Ecological Modelling, 173: 371-406. (Pubitemid 38334732)
24. Fulton, E. A., and Smith, A. D. M. 2004. Lessons learnt from a comparison of three ecosystem models for Port Phillip Bay, Australia. African Journal of Marine Science, 26: 219-243. (Pubitemid 39554051)
25. Garcia, S. M., and Cochrane, K. L. 2005. Ecosystem approach to fisheries: a review of implementation guidelines. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62: 311-318.
26. Haddon, M., 2011. Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 465 pp.
27. Hinrichsen, H.-H., Kraus, G., Böttcher, U., and Köster, F. 2009. Identifying eastern Baltic cod nursery grounds using hydrodynamic modelling: knowledge for the design of Marine Protected Areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 101-108.
28. Hinrichsen, H.-H., Möllmann, C., Voss, R., Köster, F. W., and Kornilovs, G. 2002. Biophysical modeling of larval Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) growth and survival. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59: 1858-1873. (Pubitemid 36280433)
29. ICES. 2010. Report of the ICES/HELCOM Working Group on Integrated Assessments of the Baltic Sea (WGIAB), 19-23 April 2010, ICES HQ Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES Document CM 2010/SSGRSP: 02. 94 pp.
30. ICES. 2011. ICES Advice 2011: http://www.ices.dk/advice/icesadvice. asp
31. Korpinen, S., Meski, L., Andersen, J. H., and Laamanen, M. 2012. Human pressures and their potential impact on the Baltic Sea ecosystem. Ecological Indicators, 15: 105-114.
32. Link, J. S., Brodziak, J. K. T., Edwards, S. F., Overholtz, W. J., Mountain, D., Jossi, J. W., Smith, T. D., et al. 2002. Marine ecosystem assessment in a fisheries management context. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59: 1429-1440. (Pubitemid 35368916)
33. Livingston, P. A., and Jurado-Molina, J. 2000. A multispecies virtual population analysis of the eastern Bering Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 294-299.
34. Margonski, P., Hansson, S., Tomczak, M., and Grzebielec, R. 2010. Climate influence on Baltic cod, sprat, and herring stock-recruitment relationships. Progress in Oceanography, 87: 277-288.
35. Marchal, P. 2008. A comparative analysis of métiers and catch profiles for some French demersal and pelagic fleets. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: 674-686. (Pubitemid 351774732)
36. Möllmann, C., Diekmann, R., Müller-Karulis, B., Kornilovs, G., Plikshs, M., and Axe, P. 2009. Reorganization of a large marine ecosystem due to atmospheric and anthropogenic pressure: a discontinuous regime shift in the Central Baltic Sea. Global Change Biology, 15: 1377-1399.
37. Nielsen, E. E., Hansen, M. M., Schmidt, C., Meldrup, D., and Grønkjær, P. 2001. Population of origin of Atlantic cod. Nature, 413: 272. (Pubitemid 32905841)
38. Ojaveer, H., Jaanus, A., MacKenzie, B.R., Martin, G., and Olenin, S. 2010. Status of biodiversity in the Baltic Sea. PLoS One 5: e12467.
39. Pedersen, S. A., Fock, H., Krause, J., Pusch, C., Sell, A. L., Böttcher, U., Rogers, S. I., et al. 2009. Natura 2000 sites and fisheries in German offshore waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 155-169.
40. Plaganyi, E. E., 2007. Models for an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 477. FAO, Rome. 108 pp.
41. Plaganyi, E. E., and Butterworth, D. S. 2004. A critical look at the potential of Ecopath with Ecosim to assist in practical fisheries management. African Journal of Marine Science, 26: 261-288.
42. Prellezo, R., Accadia, P., Andersen, J. L., Andersen, B. S., Buisman, E., Little, A., Nielsen, R., et al. 2012. A review of EU bioeconomic models for fisheries: the value of a diversity of models. Marine Policy, 36: 423-431.
43. Salz, P., Buisman, E., Soma, K., Frost, H., Accadia, P., and Prellezo, R. 2011. Fishrent, Bioeconomic Simulation and Optimization Model for Fisheries. LEI report 2011-024, The Hague.
44. Tomczak, M. T., Niiranen, S., Hjerne, O., and Blenckner, T. 2012. Ecosystem flow dynamics in the Baltic proper - using a multitrophic dataset as a basis for food-web modelling. Ecological Modelling, 230: 123-147.
45. Vinther, M. 2001. Ad hoc multispecies VPA tuning applied for the Baltic and North Sea fish stocks ICES Journal of Marine Science, 58: 311-320. (Pubitemid 32453924)