Using AMOEBAs to display multispecies, multifleet fisheries advice

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 709-720

  Collie, Jeremy S ^a   Gislason, Henrik ^b   Vinther, Morten ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Ecological indicators; Fisheries management; Multispecies models; North Sea

Indexed keywords

FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY MODELING; MULTISPECIES FISHERY; PREDATION;

NORTH SEA;

HETEROLOBOSEA;

EID: 0038379288     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00042-0     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersen, K. P., and Ursin, E. 1977. A multispecies extension to the Beverton and Holt theory of fishing, with accounts of phosphorous circulation and primary production. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersogelser, 7: 319-435.
2. Anon. 1991. Report of the meeting of the STCF working group on improvements of the exploitation pattern of the North Sea fish stocks. Charlottenlund Castle, June 1991. 166 pp.
3. Bax, N. J., Williams, A., Davenport, S., and Bulman, C. 1999. Managing the ecosystem by leverage points: a model for a multispecies fishery. In Ecosystem Approaches for Fisheries Management, pp. 283-303. Alaska Sea Grant College Progam, AK-SG-99-01.
4. Brugge, W. J., and Holden, M. J. 1991. Multispecies management: a manager's point of view. In Multispecies Models Relevant to Management of Living Resources, pp. 353-358. Ed. by N. Daan and M. P. Sissenwine. ICES Marine Science Symposium, 193.
5. Clark, C. W. 1985. Bioeconomic Modelling and Fisheries Management. Wiley, New York. 291 pp.
6. Collie, J. S. 2001. Fisheries multispecies dynamics. In Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences, pp. 1002-1009. Ed. by J. Steele, S. Thorpe, and K. Turekian. Academic Press, London.
7. Collie, J. S., and DeLong, A. K. 1999. Multispecies interactions in the Georges Bank fish community. In Ecosystem Approaches for Fisheries Management, pp, 187-210. Alaska Sea Grant College Progam, AK-SG-99-01.
8. Collie, J. S., and Gislason, H. 2001. Biological reference points in a multispecies context. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58: 2167-2176.
9. European Commission. 2001. Green paper on the future of the common fisheries policy. Commission of the European Communities. COM (2001) 135 final, Brussels 20.03.2001.40 pp.
10. Gislason, H. 1999. Single and multispecies reference points for Baltic fish stocks. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56: 571-583.
11. Hall, S. J. 1999. The Effects of Fishing on Marine Ecosystems and Communities. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. 274 pp.
12. Halliday, R. H., and Pinhorn, A. T. 1996. North Atlantic fisheries management systems: a comparison of management methods and resource trends. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science, 20: 135.
13. Holden, M. 1994. The Common Fisheries Policy. Origin, Evaluation and Future. Fishing News Books/Blackwell, Oxford. 274 pp.
14. Hollowed, A. B., Bax, N., Beamish, R., Collie, J. S., Fogarty, M., Livingston, P. A., Pope, J., and Rice, J. C. 2000. Are multi-species models an improvement on single-species models for measuring fishing impacts on marine ecosystems? ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 707-719.
15. Horbowy, J. 1996. The dynamics of Baltic fish stocks on the basis of a multispecies stock-production model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 53: 2115-2125.
16. ICES. 1992. Report of the Multispecies Assessment Working Group. ICES Headquarters, 16-25 June 1992. ICES CM 1992/Assess: 16. 152 pp.
17. ICES. 1997. Report of the Multispecies Assessment Working Group. ICES Headquarters, 11-19 August 1997. ICES CM 1997/Assess: 16. 235 pp.
18. ICES. 2001. Report of the Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities. ICES CM 2001/ACME: 09. 102 pp.
19. ICES. 2002a. Report of the Working Group on Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities. ICES CM 2002/ACE: 03. 189 pp.
20. ICES. 2002b. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fisheries Management. ICES Cooperative Research Report, No 255. 948 pp.
21. Laane, W. E. M., and Peters, J. S. 1993. Ecological objectives for management purposes: applying the amoeba approach. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 2: 277-286.
22. Lanters, R. L. P., Skjoldal, H. R., and Noji, T. T. 1999. Ecological Quality Objectives for the North Sea. RIKZ/Institute of Marine Research, Report 99.015, The Hague, The Netherlands. 63 pp.
23. Larkin, P. A. 1966. Exploitation in a type of predator-prey relationship. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 23: 349-356.
24. Lewy, P., Vinther, M., and Thomsen, L. 1992. Description of the STCF North Sea database system and the prediction model ABC, assessments of bio-economic consequences of technical measures. ICES CM 1992/D: 17. 19 pp.
25. Livingston, P. A., and Tjelmeland, S. 2000. Fisheries in boreal ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 619-627.
26. May, R. M., Beddington, J. R., Clark, C. W., Holt, S. J., and Laws, R. M. 1979. Management of multispecies fisheries. Science, 405: 267-276.
27. Murawski, S. 2000. Definitions of overfishing from an ecosystem perspective. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 649-658.
28. Pope, J. G. 1989. Simple representations of the yield surface. Working paper for the 1989 meeting of the ICES Multispecies Assessment Working Group. 4 pp.
29. Pope, J. G. 1991. The ICES Multispecies Assessment Working Group: evolution, insights, and future problems. In Multispecies Models Relevant to Management of Living Resources, pp. 22-33. Ed. by N. Daan and M. P. Sissenwine. ICES Marine Science Symposium, 193.
30. Pope, J. G. 1997. Integrating and presenting scientific fisheries management advice for complex fisheries subject to multiple objectives. In Multiple Objectives and Fisheries Management: Strategies for the Future, pp. 29-53. Ed. by C. C. Montero. Instituto de Investigaçao das Pescas e do Mar, Avenida de Brasília, Lisboa, Portugal.
31. Rice, J. 2000. Evaluating fishery impacts using metrics of community structure. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 682-688.
32. Sullivan, K. J. 1991. The estimation of parameters of the multi-species production model. In Multispecies models relevant to management of living resources, pp. 185-193. Ed. by N. Daan and M. P. Sissenwine. ICES Marine Science Symposium, 193.
33. Ten Brink, B. J. E., Hosper, S. H., and Colijn, F. 1991. A quantitative method for description and assessment of ecosystems: the AMOEBA approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 23: 265-270.
34. Tufte, E. R. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT. 197 pp.
35. Vinther, M., Lewy, P., and Thomsen, L. 2001. Specification and Documentation of the 4M Package Containing Multi-species, Multi-Fleet and Multi-Area Models. Danish Institute for Fishcries Research, Charlottenlund, 70 pp. (contact mv@dfu.min.dk).
36. Wefering, F. M., Danielson, L. E. and White, N. M. 2000. Using the AMOEBA approach to measure progress toward ecosystem sustainability within a shellfish restoration project in North Carolina. Ecological Modelling, 130: 157-166.