A comparative analysis of métiers and catch profiles for some French demersal and pelagic fleets

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 674-686

  Marchal, Paul ^a  

^a IFREMER   (France)

Author keywords

Catch profiles; Fishing intention; Fleets; M tiers; Uncertainty coefficients

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL VARIATION; CATCHABILITY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMERSAL FISHERY; FORECASTING METHOD; GILLNET; PELAGIC ECOSYSTEM; RESEARCH VESSEL; TRAWLING; TYPOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BAY OF BISCAY; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; NORTH SEA; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 44649141850     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsn044     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anon. 2004. New Zealand Ministry of fisheries WAREHOU database documentation, catch and effort base views and fields, version 6.0. 42 pp.
2. Biseau, A. 1998. Definition of a directed fishing effort in a mixed-species trawl fishery, and its impact on stock assessment. Aquatic Living Resources, 11: 119-136.
3. Biseau, A., and Gondeaux, E. 1988. Apport des méthodes d'ordination en typologie des flottilles. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 44: 286-296.
4. Christensen, A-S., and Raakjer, J. 2006. Fishermen's tactical and strategic decisions. A case study of Danish demersal fisheries. Fisheries Research, 81: 258-267.
5. EC. 2005. Commission Staff Working Paper: Report of the Ad Hoc Meeting of Independent Experts on Fleet-Fishery based Sampling, Nantes (France), 23-27 May 2005. 34 pp.
6. EC. 2006. Commission Staff Working Paper: Report of the Ad Hoc Meeting of Independent Experts on Fleet-Fishery based Sampling, Nantes (France), 12-16 June 2006. 98 pp.
7. Goodman, L. A., and Kruskal, W. H. 1979. Measures of Association for Cross Classification. Springer, New York.
8. Holley, J-F., and Marchal, P. 2004. Fishing strategy development under changing conditions: examples from the French offshore fleet fishing in the North Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 61: 1410-1431.
9. ICES. 2003. Report of the Study Group for the Development of Fishery-based Forecasts. ICES Document CM 2003/ACFM: 08 Ref. D. 37 pp.
10. ICES. 2007. Report of the Working Group on Assessment of New MoU Species. ICES Document CM 2007/ACFM: 01 Ref. LRC. 228 pp.
11. Laurec, A., Biseau, A., and Charuau, A. 1991. Modelling technical interactions. ICES Marine Science Symposia, 193: 225-236.
12. Léwy, P., and Vinther, M. 1994. Identification of Danish North Sea trawl fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 51: 263-272.
13. Mahé, K., Destombes, A., Coppin, F., Koubbi, P., Vaz, S., Le Roy, D., and Carpentier, A. 2005. Le rouget barbet de roche Mullus surmuletus (L. 1758) en Manche orientale et mer du Nord. IFREMER Document. 187 pp. (in French).
14. Marchal, P., Andersen, B., Bromley, D., Iriondo, A., Mahévas, S., Quirijns, F., Rackham, B. et al. 2006. Improving the definition of fishing effort for important European fleets by accounting for the skipper effect. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 63: 510-533.
15. Marchal, P., and Horwood, J. 1996. Long-term targets for the Celtic Sea mixed-species multi-métiers fisheries. Aquatic Living Resource, 9: 81-94.
16. Murawski, S. A., and Finn, J. T. 1986. Optimal effort allocation among competing mixed-species fisheries, subject to fishing mortality constraints. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43: 90-110.
17. Neis, B., Schneider, D. C., Felt, L., Haedrich, R. L., Fischer, J., and Hutchings, J. A. 1999. Fisheries assessment: what can be learned from interviewing resource users? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56: 1949-1963.
18. Pelletier, D., and Ferraris, J. 2000. A multivariate approach for defining fishing tactics from commercial catch and effort data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57: 51-65.
19. SAS/STAT. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
20. Ulrich, C., and Andersen, B. A. 2004. Dynamics of fisheries, and the flexibility of vessel activity in Denmark between 1989 and 2001. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 61: 308-322.
21. Ulrich, C., Gascuel, D., Dunn, M. R., Le Gallic, B., and Dintheer, C. 2001. Estimation of technical interactions due to the competition for resource in a mixed-species fishery, and the typology of fleets and métiers in the English Channel. Aquatic Living Resources, 14: 267-281.
22. Vinther, M., Reeves, S. A., and Patterson, K. R. 2004. From single-species advice to mixed-species management: taking the next step. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 61: 1398-1409.