An environmental assessment of risk in achieving good environmental status to support regional prioritisation of management in Europe

Marine Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1033-1043

  Breen, P ^a   Robinson, L A ^b   Rogers, S I ^a   Knights, A M ^b   Piet, G ^c   Churilova, T ^d   Margonski, P ^e   Papadopoulou, N ^f   Akoglu, E ^g   Eriksson, A ^h   Finenko, Z ^d   Fleming Lehtinen, V ^h   Galil, B ⁱ   Goodsir, F ^a   Goren, M ^j   Kryvenko, O ^d   Leppanen, J M ^h   Markantonatou, V ^f   Moncheva, S ^k   Oguz, T ^g   Paltriguera, L ^a   Stefanova, K ^k   Timofte, F ^l   Thomsen, F ^a   more..

^a CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d INSTITUTE OF HYDROBIOLOGY   (Ukraine)

^e NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^f INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY   (Greece)

^g MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^h FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

ⁱ ISRAEL OCEANOGRAPHIC AND LIMNOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Israel)

^j TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^k INSTITUTE OF OCEANOLOGY   (Bulgaria)

^l NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MARINE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GRIGORE ANTIPA   (Romania)

more..

Author keywords

GES; Management; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Risk assessment; Status

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MARINE POLICY; REGIONAL PLANNING; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA; BLACK SEA; EUROPE;

EID: 84860664032     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Curtin R., Prellezo R. Understanding marine ecosystem based management: a literature review. Mar. Policy 2010, 34:821-830.
2. Rosenberg A., Sandifer P. What do Managers Need? Ecosystem-Based Management for the Oceans 2009, Island Press, Washington DC.
3. Ruckelshaus M., Klinger T., Knowlton N., DeMaster D.P. Marine ecosystem-based management in practice: scientific and governance challenges. Bioscience 2008, 58:53-63.
4. EC. DIRECTIVE 2008/56/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). 2008.
5. Borja A., Elliott M., Carstensen J., Heiskanen A.S., van de Bund W. Marine management - towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60:2175-2186.
6. Foden J., Rogers S.I., Jones A.P. A critical review of approaches to aquatic environmental assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56:1825-1833.
7. OSPAR Quality Status Report 2010 2010, London OSPAR Commission.
8. Piha H., Zampoukas N. Review of methodological standards related to the marine strategy framework directive criteria on good environmental status. Eur. Commission Joint Res. Centre. Inst. Environ. Sustainability 2010.
9. EC Commission Decision of 1 September 2010 on Criteria and Methodological Standards on Good Environmental Status of Marine Waters 2010, European Commission 2010/477/EU, Brussels.
10. Cardoso AC, Cochrane S, Doerner H, Ferreira JG, Galgani F, Hagebro C, et al. SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON THE MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE Management Group Report. 2010.
11. Robinson LA, Knights, TK. ODEMM pressure assessment userguide. ODEMM guidance document series No. 2. EC FP7 project (244273). Options for delivering ecosystem-based marine management. University of Liverpool: 2011. 12 pp. ISBN: 978-0-906370-62-9.
12. IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2011.
13. EC. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a ramework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Union2008. p. 19-40.
14. DEFRA. Charting Progress 2: The state of UK Seas. London DEFRA; 2010. p. pp. 194.
15. BSC. Marine Litter in the Black Sea Region. Istanbul: Black Sea Commission; 2009.
16. DAISIE. Handbook of Alien Species in Europe; 2009.
17. Greenstreet S.P.R., Rogers S.I. Indicators of the health of the North Sea fish community: identifying reference levels for an ecosystem approach to management. ICES J. Mar. Sci.: J. du Conseil 2006, 63:573-593.
18. BSC Strategic Action Plan for the Environmental Protection and Rehabilitation of the Black Sea 2009, Black Sea Commission, Sofia.
19. HELCOM HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan 2007, HELCOM, Krakow.
20. IUCN. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria version 3.1. IUCN; 2001. p. ii +30 pp.
21. Knights AM, Koss RS, Papadopoulou N, Cooper LH, Robinson LA. Sustainable use of European regional seas and the role of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Deliverable 1. EC FP7 project (244273). Options for delivering ecosystem-based marine management. University of Liverpool: 2011. 165 pp. ISBN: 978-0-906370-63-6.
22. EC. European Commission: a fisheries policy for the future In: Commission E, editor. 2011.
23. CBD. Aichi Biodiversity Targets. 2011.
24. Borja A. The new European Marine Strategy Directive: Difficulties, opportunities, and challenges. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2006, 52:239-242.
25. ICES.WGECO. Unpublished report. 2011.
26. Punt A., #233 E., Smith A.D.M., Cui G. Evaluation of management tools for Australia's South East Fishery.3. Towards selecting appropriate harvest strategies. Mar. Freshwater Res. 2002, 53:645-660.
27. Pearce D. Cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 1998, 14:84-100.