Tracking the Time Course of Word-Frequency Effects in Auditory Word Recognition With Event-Related Potentials

Cognitive Science

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 489-507

  Dufour, Sophie ^a   Brunellière, Angèle ^b   Frauenfelder, Ulrich H ^c,d  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b Univ Lille   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^d Fondation Universitaire à Distance   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Frequency; Neighborhood density

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875626838     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12015     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419-439.
2. Assadollahi, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Neuromagnetic evidence for early access to cognitive representations. NeuroReport, 12, 207-213.
3. Assadollahi, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2003). Early influences of word length and frequency: A group study using MEG. NeuroReport, 14, 1183-1187.
4. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
5. Connine, C. M., Mullennix, J., Shernoff, E., & Yelen, J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 1084-1096.
6. Connine, C. M., Titone, D., & Wang, J. (1993). Auditory word recognition: Extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 81-94.
7. Connolly, J. F., & Phillips, N. A. (1994). Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 256-266.
8. Connolly, J. F., Phillips, N. A., Stewart, S. H., & Brake, W. G. (1992). Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences. Brain and Language, 43, 1-18.
9. Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Time course of frequency effects in spoken word recognition: evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 317-367.
10. Desroches, A. S., Newman, R. L., & Joanisse, M. F. (2009). Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: Electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1893-1906.
11. Dufour, S., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2010). Phonological neighbourhood effects in French spoken word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 226-238.
12. Dufour, S., Peereman, R., Pallier, C., & Radeau, M. (2002). VoCoLex: A lexical database on phonological similarity between French words. L'Année Psychologique, 102, 725-746.
13. Dumay, N., Benrais, A., Barriol, B., Colin, C., Radeau, M., & Besson, M. (2001). Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 121-143.
14. Embick, D., Hackl, M., Schaeffer, J., Kelepir, M., & Marantz, A. (2001). A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 345-348.
15. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Peters, G. (1998). Simulating the time course of word recognition: An analysis of lexical competition in TRACE. In J. Grainger & A. Jacobs (Eds.), Symbolic/connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 102-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Friedrich, C. K., Kotz, S. A., Friederici, A. D., & Alter, K. (2004). Pitch modulates lexical identification in spoken word recognition: ERP and behavioral evidence. Journal of Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 300-308.
17. Friedrich, C. K., Kotz, S. A., Friederici, A. D., & Gunter, T. C. (2004). ERPs reflect lexical identification in word fragment priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 541-552.
18. Friedrich, C. K., Schild, U., & Röder, B. (2009). Electrophysiological indices of word fragment priming allow characterizing neural stages of speech recognition. Biological Psychology, 80, 105-113.
19. Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613-656.
20. Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-111.
21. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530.
22. Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word-recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30, 1383-1400.
23. Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090-1103.
24. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neural plasticity in the dynamics of visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 244, 61-64.
25. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 463-470.
26. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
27. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation Model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
28. Magnuson, J. S., Dixon, J. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 31, 133-156.
29. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
30. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 148-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interaction and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
32. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
33. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
34. New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français comtemporain: Lexique. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
35. Newman, R. L., & Connolly, J. F. (2009). Electrophysiological markers of pre-lexical speech processing: Evidence for bottom-up and top-down effects on spoken word processing. Biological Psychology, 80, 114-121.
36. Newman, R. L., Connolly, J. F., Service, E., & McIvor, K. (2003). Influence of phonological expectations during a phoneme deletion task: Evidence from event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 640-647.
37. Norris, D. (1994). SHORTLIST: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
38. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
39. Penolazzi, B., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Early Semantic Context Integration and Lexical Access as Revealed by Event-Related Potentials. Biological Psychology, 74, 374-388.
40. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., Giard, M. H., & Echallier, J. F. (1987). Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 66, 75-81.
41. Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Segui, J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1297-1311.
42. Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 2195-2200.
43. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
44. Vitevitch, M. S. (2007). The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 35, 166-175.
45. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9, 325-329.
46. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374-408.