Fruit texture phenotypes of the RosBREED U.S. apple reference germplasm set

HortScience

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 296-303

  Schmitz, Cari A ^a   Clark, Matthew D ^a   Luby, James J ^a   Bradeen, James M ^a   Guan, Yingzhu ^b   Evans, Katherine ^b   Orcheski, Benjamin ^c   Brown, Susan ^c   Verma, Sujeet ^b   Peace, Cameron ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Crispness; Firmness; Fruit quality; Juiciness; Malus xdomestica; Marker assisted breeding; Penetrometer; Sensory panel

Indexed keywords

MALUS; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 84875532898     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.48.3.296     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bassil, N.V. and G.M. Volk. 2010. Standardized phenotyping: Advantages to horticulture-Introduction to the workshop. HortScience 45:1306.
2. Blanpied, G.D. and K.J. Silsby. 1992. Predicting harvest date windows for apples. Cornell Coop. Ext. Info. Bul. 221:1-12.
3. Bliss, F.A. 2010. Marker-assisted breeding in horticultural crops. Acta Hort. 859:339-350.
4. Brookfield, P.L., S. Nicoll, F.A. Gunson, F.R. Harker, and M. Wohlers. 2011. Sensory evaluation by small postharvest teams and the relationship with instrumental measures of apple texture. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 59:179-186.
5. Chagné, D., R.N. Crowhurst, M. Troggio, M.W. Davey, B. Gilmore, C. Lawley, S. Vanderzande, R.P. Hellens, S. Kumar, A. Cestaro, R. Velasco, D. Main, J.D. Rees, A. Iezzoni, T. Mockler, L. Wilhelm, E. van de Weg, S.E. Gardiner, N. Bassil, and C. Peace. 2012. Genome-wide SNP detection, validation, and development of an 8k SNP array for apple. PLoS ONE 7:e31745.
6. DeLong, J.M., R.K. Prange, P.A. Harrison, and K.B. McRae. 2000. Comparison of a new apple firmness penetrometer with three standard instruments. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 19:201-209.
7. Evans, K., L. Brutcher, B. Konishi, and B. Barritt. 2010. Correlation of sensory analysis with physical textural data from a computerized penetrometer in the Washington State University apple breeding program. HortTechnology 20:1026-1029.
8. Evans, K., J. Luby, S. Brown, M. Clark, Y. Guan, B. Orcheski, C. Schmitz, C. Peace, E. van de Weg, and A. Iezzoni. 2012. Large-scale standardized phenotyping of apple in RosBREED. Proc. 4th Intl. Conf. Postharv. Unlimited 2011. Acta Hort. 945:233-238.
9. Fillion, L. and D. Kilcast. 2002. Consumer perception of crispness and crunchiness in fruits and vegetables. Food Qual. Prefer. 13:23-29.
10. Harker, F.R., R.L. Amos, G. Echeverri{dotless}́a, and F.A. Gunson. 2006. Influence of texture on taste: Insights gained during studies of hardness, juiciness, and sweetness of apple fruit. J. Food Sci. 71:S77-S82.
11. Harker, F.R., F.A. Gunson, and S.R. Jaeger. 2003. The case for fruit quality: An interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 28:333-347.
12. Harker, F.R., E.M. Kupferman, A.B. Marin, F.A. Gunson, and C.M. Triggs. 2008. Eating quality standards for apples based on consumer preferences. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 50: 70-78.
13. Harker, F.R., J. Maindonald, S.H. Murray, F.A. Gunson, I.C. Hallett, and S.B. Walker. 2002. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: Texture of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24:225-239.
14. Ioannides, Y., M.S. Howarth, C. Raithatha, M. Defernez, E.K. Kemsley, andA.C. Smith. 2007. Texture analysis of Red Delicious fruit: Towards multiple measurements on individual fruit. Food Qual. Prefer. 18:825-833.
15. Kampstra, P. 2008. Beanplot: A boxplot for alternative for visual comparison of distributions. J. Stat. Software 28:1-9. 23 Nov. 2012. .
16. McKay, S.J., J.M. Bradeen, and J.J. Luby. 2011. Prediction of genotypic values for apple fruit texture traits in a breeding population derived from 'Honeycrisp'. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 136:408-414.
17. Mohr, B.C. and C.L. Mohr. 2000. The Mohr Digi-Test (MDT) computerized agricultural penetrometer as an applematurity tool. 30Apr. 2012. .
18. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 23 Nov. 2012. .
19. Roudaut, G., C. Dacremont, B. Vallés Pamies, B. Colas, and M. Le Meste. 2002. Crispness: A critical review on sensory and material science approaches. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 13:217-227.
20. Stopar, M., U. Bolcina, A. Vanzo, and U. Vrhovsek. 2002. Lower crop load for cv. Jonagold apples (Malus 3 domestica Borkh.) increases polyphenol content and fruit quality. J. Agr. Food Chem. 50:1643-1646.
21. Vickers, Z. and M.C. Bourne. 1976. A psychoacoustical theory of crispness. J. Food Sci. 41:1158-1164.
22. Zdunek, A., J. Cybulska, D. Konopacka, and K. Rutkowski. 2011. Inter-laboratory analysis of firmness and sensory texture of stored apples. Intl. Agrophysics 25:67-75.