Correlation of sensory analysis with physical textural data from a computerized penetrometer in the Washington State University apple breeding program

HortTechnology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1026-1029

  Evans, Kate ^a   Brutcher, Lisa ^a   Konishi, Bonnie ^a   Barritt, Bruce ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crispness; Digi test; Hardness

Indexed keywords

MALUS; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 78650766470     PISSN: 10630198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.20.6.1026     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barreiro, P., C. Ortiz, M. Ruiz-Altisent, V. De Smedt, S. Schotte, Z. Andani, I. Wakeling, and P. Beyts. 1998. Comparison between sensory and instrumental measurements for mealiness assessment in apples. A collaborative test. J. Texture Stud. 29:509-525.
2. Blanpied, G.D. and K. Silsby. 1992. Predicting harvest date windows for apples. Cornell Univ. Info. Bul. 221.
3. Daillant-Spinnler, B., H.J.H. MacFie, P.K. Beyts D. Hedderley. 1996. Relationships between perceived sensory properties and major preference directions of 12 varieties of apples fromthe southern hemisphere. Food Qual. Prefer. 7:113-126.
4. De Baerdemaeker, J. 1988. The use of mechanical resonance measurements to determine fruit texture. Acta Hort. 258: 331-340.
5. Dever, M.C., M.A. Cliff, and J.W. Hall. 1995. Analysis of variation and multivariate relationships among analytical and sensory characteristics in whole apple evaluation. J. Sci. Food Agr. 69:329-338.
6. Harker, F., J. Maindonald, S. Murray, F. Gunson, I. Hallet, and S. Walker. 2002. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements. 1: Texture of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24:225-239.
7. Magness, J.R. and G.F. Taylor. 1925. An improved type of pressure tester for the determination of fruit maturity. U.S.Dept. Agr. Circ. No. 350.
8. Mann, H., D. Bedford, J. Luby, Z.Vickers, C. Tong. 2005. Relationship of instrumental and sensory texture measurements of fresh and stored apples to cell number and size. HortScience 40:1815-1820.
9. Mohr, B.C. and C.L. Mohr. 2000. The Mohr Digi-Test (MDT) computerizedagricultural penetrometer as an apple maturity tool. 8 Oct. 2010. http://www.mohr-engineering.com/documents/MDTPosterPaper.pdf.
10. Molina-Delgado, D., S. Alegre, J. Puy, and I. Recasens. 2009. Relationship between acoustic firmness and Magness Taylor firmness in Royal Gala and Golden Smoothee apples. Food Sci. Technol. Int.15:31-40.
11. Oraguzie, N., P. Alspach, R. Volz, C. Whitworth, C. Ranatunga, R. Weskett, R. Harker. 2009. Postharvest assessment of fruit quality parameters in apple using both instruments and an expert panel. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 52:279-287.
12. Rudell, D.R., D.S. Mattison, J.K. Fellman, and J.P. Mattheis. 2000. The progression of ethylene production and respiration in the tissues of ripening 'Fuji' apple fruit. HortScience 35:1300-1303.
13. Warner, G. 2007. Inside scoop. Good Fruit Grower 58:23.
14. Zdunek, A., D. Konopacka, and K. Jesionkowska. 2010. Crispness and crunchiness judgment of apples based on contact acoustic emission. J. Texture Stud. 41:75-91.
15. Zerbini, P., A. Pianezzola, and M. Grassi. 1997. Post storage sensory profiles of fruit of five apple cultivars harvested at different maturity stages. J. Food Qual. 22:1-17.