Prediction of genotypic values for apple fruit texture traits in a breeding population derived from 'Honeycrisp'

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 136, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 408-414

  McKay, Steven J ^a   Bradeen, James M ^a   Luby, James J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MALUS; MALUS PUMILA; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 81755181869     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.136.6.408     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allan-Wojtas, P., K.A. Sanford, K.B. McRae, and S. Carbyn2003. An integrated microstructural and sensory approach to describe apple texture. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128:381-390.
2. Alspach, P.A. and N.C. Oraguzie. 2002. Estimation of genetic parameters of apple (Malus domestica) fruit quality from open-pollinated families. N. Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci. 30:219-228.
3. Bates, D. 2007. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.99875-9. 3 Mar. 2011. urlhttp://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html.
4. Bink, M.C.A.M., M.P. Boer, C.J.F. ter Braak, J. Jansen, R.E. Voorrips, and W.E. van de Weg. 2008. Bayesian analysis of complex traits in pedigreed plant populations. Euphytica 161:85-96.
5. Blanpied, G.D. and K.J. Silsby. 1992. Predicting harvest date windows for apples. Cornell Coop. Ext. Info. Bul. 221:1-12.
6. Chauvin, M.A., C.F. Ross, M. Pitts, E. Kaupferman, and B. Swanson. 2010. Relationship between instrumental and sensory determination of apple and pear texture. J. Food Qual. 33:181-198.
7. Daillant-Spinnler, B., H.J.H. MacFie, P.K. Beyts, and D. Hedderley. 1996. Relationships between perceived sensory properties and major preference direction of 12 varieties of apples from the southern hemisphere. Food Qual. Prefer. 7:113-126.
8. Durel, C.E., F. Laurens, A. Fouillet, and Y. Lespinasse. 1998.Utilization of pedigree information to estimate genetic parameters rom large unbalanced data sets in apple. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:1077-1085.
9. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. 2010. FAOSTAT. 8 Apr. 2011. urlhttp://faostat.fao.org.
10. Green, B.G., G.S. Shaffer, and M.M. Gilmore. 1993. Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chem. Senses 18:683-702.
11. Hampson, C.R., H.A. Quamme, J.W. Hall, R.A. MacDonald, M.C. King, and M.A. Cliff. 2000. Sensory evaluation as a selection tool in apple breeding. Euphytica 111:79-90.
12. Harker, F.R., K. Lau, and F.A. Gunson. 2003. Juiciness of fresh fruit: A time-intensity study. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 29:55-60.
13. Harker, F.R., J. Maindonald, S.H. Murray, F.A. Gunson, I.C. Hallett, and S.B. Walker. 2002. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: Texture of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24:225-239.
14. Janick, J., J.N. Cummins, S.K. Brown, and M. Hemmat. 1996. Apples, p. 1-77. In: Janick, J. and J.N. Moore (eds.). Fruit breeding, Volume I: Tree and tropical fruits. Wiley, New York, NY.
15. John, J.A. and E.R. Williams. 1995. Cyclic and computer generated designs. 2nd Ed. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
16. Karlsen, A.M., K. Aaby, H. Sievertsen, P. Baardseth, and M.R. Ellekjær. 1999. Instrumental and sensory analysis of fresh Norwegian and imported apples. Food Qual. Prefer. 10:305-314.
17. King, G.J., C. Maliepaard, J.R. Lynn, F.H. Alston, C.E. Durel, K.M. Evans, B. Griffon, F. Laurens, A.G. Manganaris, E. Schrevens, S. Tartarini, and J. Verhaegh. 2000. Quantitative genetic analysis and comparison of physical and sensory descriptors relating to fruit flesh firmness in apple (Malus pumila Mill.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:1074-1084.
18. Kouassi, A.B., C.-E. Durel, F. Costa, S. Tartarini, E. van de Weg, K. Evans, F. Fernandez-Fernandez, C. Govan, A. Boudichevskaja, F. Dunemann, A. Antofie, M. Lateur, M. Stankiewicz-Kosyl, A. Soska, K. Tomala, M. Lewandowski, K. Rutkovski, E. Zurawicz, W. Guerra, and F. Laurens. 2009. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for apple fruit-quality traits using pedigreed plant material in Europe. Tree Genet. Genomes 5:659-672.
19. Lougheed, E.C. and E.W. Franklin. 1974. Ethylene production increased by bruising of apples. HortScience 9:192-193.
20. Mann, H., D. Bedford, J. Luby, Z. Vickers, and C. Tong. 2005. Relationship of instrumental and sensory texture measurements of fresh and stored apples to cell number and size. HortScience 40:1815-1820.
21. Oraguzie, N.C., M.E. Hofstee, L.R. Brewer, and C. Howard. 2001. Estimation of genetic parameters in a recurrent selection program in apple. Euphytica 118:29-37.
22. Péneau, S., E. Hoehn, H.-R. Roth, F. Escher, and J. Nuessli. 2006. Importance and consumer perception of freshness of apples. Food Qual. Prefer. 17:9-19.
23. Piepho, H.P. and J. Möhring. 2007. Computing heritability and selection response from unbalanced plant breeding trials. Enetics 177:1881-1888.
24. Piepho, H.P., J. Möhring, A.E. Melchinger, and A. Büchse. 2008. BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209-228.
25. Piepho, H.P., E.R. Williams, and M. Fleck. 2006. A note on the analysis of designed experiments with complex treatment structure. HortScience 41:446-452.
26. Pinheiro, J.C. and D.M. Bates. 2002. Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New York, NY.
27. Poehlman, J.M. and D.A. Sleper. 1995. Breeding field crops. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA.
28. R Development Core Team. 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 3 Apr. 2011. http://www.R-project.org
29. Whitaker, D., E.R. Williams, and J.A. John. 2004, CycDesigN: A package for the computer generation of experimental designs. Version 2.1. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Canberra, Australia.