Contextual constraint and N + 2 preview effects in reading

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 619-633

  Radach, Ralph ^a   Inhoff, Albrecht W ^b   Glover, Lisa ^c   Vorstius, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contextual constraint; Eye movements; Parafoveal processing; Parafoveal on foveal effects; Reading

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; VISUAL FIELD; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VISUAL FIELDS; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875371684     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.761256     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Angele, B. and Rayner, K. 2011. Parafoveal processing of word N+2 during reading: Do the preceding words matter?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37: 1210-1220. (doi:10.1037/a0023096)
2. Angele, B., Slattery, T. J., Yang, J., Kliegl, R. and Rayner, K. 2008. Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating N+1 and N+2 previews simultaneously. Visual Cognition, 16: 697-707. (doi:10.1080/13506280802009704)
3. Baayen, R. H. (2011). languageR: Data sets and functions with "Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics". R package version 1.2. Retrieved fromhttp://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR
4. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. and van Rijn, H. 1993. "The CELEX lexical database (Release 1) [CD-ROM]". Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
5. Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A. and Rayner, K. 1985. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17: 364-390. (doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1)
6. Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2011). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-39. Retrieved fromhttp://www.r-project.org/
7. Brysbaert, M., Drieghe, D. and Vitu, F. 2005. "Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading". In Cognitive processes in eye guidance, Edited by: Underwood, G. 53-77. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Engbert, R., Longtin, A. and Kliegl, R. 2002. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42: 621-636. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00301-7)
9. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. and Kliegl, R. 2005. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112: 777-813. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777)
10. Frisson, S., Rayner, K. and Pickering, M. J. 2005. Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5): 862-877. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.862)
11. Glover, L., Vorstius, C., & Radach, R. (in press). Exploring the limits of distant parafoveal processing during reading: A new look at N+2 preview effects. Journal of Eye Movement Research.
12. Inhoff, A., Eiter, B. and Radach, R. 2005. Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31: 979-995. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.979)
13. Inhoff, A. W. and Radach, R. 1998. "Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes". In Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, Edited by: Underwood, G. 29-54. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
14. Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R. and Eiter, B. 2006. Temporal overlap in the processing of successive words in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32: 1490-1495. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1490)
15. Kennedy, A., Radach, R., Heller, D. and Pynte, J. 2000. Reading as a perceptual process, Edited by: Kennedy, A., Radach, R., Heller, D. and Pynte, J. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
16. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A. and Engbert, R. 2006. Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135: 12-35. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12)
17. Kliegl, R., Risse, S. and Laubrock, J. 2007. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5): 1250-1255. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1250)
18. LaBerge, D. and Brown, V. 1989. Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96: 101-124. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.101)
19. McConkie, G. W. 1981. Evaluating and reporting data quality in eye movement research. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 13: 97-106. (doi:10.3758/BF03207916)
20. O'Regan, J. K. 1979. Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 25: 501-509. (doi:10.3758/BF03213829)
21. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D. and Rayner, K. 2006. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52(1): 1-56. (doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.001)
22. Posner, M. I. 1978. Chronometric explorations of mind, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. and Davidson, B. J. 1980. Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109: 160-174. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160)
24. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
25. Radach, R., Inhoff, A. W. and Heller, D. 2004. Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16: 27-51. (doi:10.1080/09541440340000222)
26. Radach, R. and Kennedy, A. 2004. Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2): 3-26. (doi:10.1080/09541440340000295)
27. Radach, R. and Kennedy, A. 2013. Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66: 429-452.
28. Radach, R., Reilly, R. and Inhoff, A. 2007. "Models of oculomotor control in reading: Toward a theoretical foundation of current debates". In Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, Edited by: van Gompel, R. P. G., Fischer, M. H., Murray, W. S. and Hill, R. L. 237-270. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
29. Rayner, K. 1975. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 65-81. (doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5)
30. Rayner, K. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124: 372-422. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372)
31. Rayner, K. 2009. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8): 1457-1506. (doi:10.1080/17470210902816461)
32. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J. and Brown, S. J. 2007. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1): 230-245. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.230)
33. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B. and Liversedge, S. P. 2003. "On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading". In The mind 's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research, Edited by: Hyönä, J., Radach, R. and Deubel, H. 213-234. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
34. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L. and Rayner, K. 1998. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1): 125-157. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125)
35. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. 2003. The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26: 446-526. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X03000104)
36. Reilly, R. and Radach, R. 2003. "Foundations of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading". In The mind 's eye: Cognition and applied aspects of eye movement research, Edited by: Hyönä, J., Radach, R. and Deubel, H. 429-455. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
37. Reilly, R. and Radach, R. 2006. Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7: 34-55. (doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.006)
38. White, S. J. 2008. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34: 205-223. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205)
39. Yang, J., Rayner, K., Li, N. and Wang, S. 2012. Is preview benefit from word n+2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 25: 1079-1091. (doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9282-7)
40. Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1192-1204.