Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 27-51

  Radach, Ralph ^a   Inhoff, Albrecht ^b   Heller, Dieter ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA ANALYSIS; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; ORTHOGRAPHY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; RETINA FOVEA; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SEMANTICS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 1642540200     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440340000222     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (72)

1. Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 285-311.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The Celex Lexical database [CD-ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Balota, D. A., & Rayner, K. (1991). Word recognition processes in foveal and parafoveal vision: The range of influence of lexical variables. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 198-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Beauvillain, C., & Doré, K. (1998). Orthographic codes are used in integrating information from the parafovea by the saccadic computation system. Vision Research, 38, 115-123.
5. Beauvillain, C., Doré, K., & Baudouin, V. (1996). The "centre of gravity" of words: Evidence for an effect of word-initial letters. Vision Research, 36, 589-603.
6. Becker, W. (1989). Metrics. In R. H. Wurtz & M. E. Goldberg (Eds.), The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements (pp. 13-61). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Becker, W., & Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19, 967-983.
8. Briihl, D., & Inhoff, A. W. (1995). Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 55-67.
9. Brysbaert, M., & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 125-148). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
10. Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., & Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychologia, 10, 385-395.
11. Deubel, H., O'Regan, J. K., & Radach, R. (2000). Attention, information processing and eye movement control. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 355-376). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
12. Everatt, J., & Underwood, G. (1992). Parafoveal guidance and priming effects during reading: A special case of the mind being ahead of the eyes. Consciousness and Cognition, 1, 186-197.
13. Findlay, J. M., & Harris, L. R. (1984). Small saccades to double-stepped target moving in two dimensions. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 71-78). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. Findlay, J. M., & Walker, R. (1999). A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 661-721.
15. Hochberg, J. (1970). Components of literacy: Speculations and exploratory research. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies in reading. New York: Basic Books.
16. Hochberg, J. (1976). Toward a speech-plan eye movement model of reading. In R. A. Monty & J. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes (pp. 397-416). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Hyönä, J. (1993). Eye movements during reading and discourse processing [Psychological Research Rep. No. 65]. Turku, Finland: University of Turku.
18. Hyönä, J. (1995). Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 68-81.
19. Hyönä J., Niemi, P., & Underwood, G. (1989). Reading long words embedded in sentences: Informativeness of word halves affects eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 142-152.
20. Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
21. Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2000). Processing of Finnish compound words in reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 65-87). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
22. Inhoff, A. W. (1982). Parafoveal word perception: A further case against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 137-145.
23. Inhoff, A. W. (1989). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 544-555.
24. Inhoff, A. W., Briihl, D., & Schwartz, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming and delayed naming tasks. Memory and Cognition, 24, 466-476.
25. Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29-54). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
26. Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (2002). The biology of reading: Using of spatial segmentation in the reading of complex words. Comments on Theoretical Biology, 7, 121-138.
27. Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Eiter, B., & Juhasz, B. (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 803-827.
28. Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 429-455.
29. Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., & Ducrot, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1307-1337.
30. Kerr, P. W. (1992). Eye movement control during reading: The selection of where to send the eyes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
31. Lavigne, F., Vitu, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2000). The influence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words. Acta Psychologica, 104, 191-214.
32. Lima, S. D. (1987). Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Memory and Language, 26, 84-99.
33. Lima, S. D., & Inhoff, A. W. (1985). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word initial letter sequence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 272-285.
34. Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1998). Foveal processing load and landing position effects in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 201-221). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
35. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
36. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 245-253.
37. McConkie, G. W., & Zola D. (1987). Visual attention during eye fixations while reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 385-401). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.
38. Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 667-682.
39. Nazir, T. A., Heller, D., & Sußmann, C. (1992). Letter visibility and word recognition: The optimal viewing position in printed words. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 315-328.
40. O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395-453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
41. O'Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effects in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 185-197.
42. O'Regan, J. K., Lévy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillère, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 250-257.
43. Ottes, F. P., van Gisbergen, J. A. M., & Eggermont, J. J. (1984). Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: Two different modes. Vision Research, 24, 1169-1179.
44. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Reading. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 401-436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Ducrot, S. (2004). The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 178-202.
46. Radach, R., Heller, D., & Inhoff, A. W. (1999). Occurrence and function of very short fixation durations in reading. In W. Becker, H. Deubel, & T. Mergner (Eds.), Current oculomotor research: Physiological and psychological aspects. New York: Plenum Publishers.
47. Radach, R., & Kempe, V. (1993). An individual analysis of initial fixation positions in reading. In G. d'Ydewalle & J. Van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 213-226). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
48. Radach, R., & McConkie, G. W. (1998). Determinants of fixation positions in words during reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 77-100). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
49. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
50. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
51. Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40(4), 473-483.
52. Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., Ashby, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading: Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41, 943-954.
53. Rayner, K., & Morris, R. K. (1992). Eye movement control in reading: Evidence against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 163-172.
54. Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., & Pollatsek, A. (2000). Eye movement control in reading: Updating the E-Z Reader model to account for initial fixation locations and refixations. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 701-719). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
55. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188-1200.
56. Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 537-550.
57. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
58. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403-4411.
59. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (in press). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
60. Reilly, R. G., & O'Regan, J. K. (1998). Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies. Vision Research, 38, 303-317.
61. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2003). Glenmore: An interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 429-456). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
62. Stevens, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 133-151.
63. Treisman A. M., & Gelade G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
64. Underwood, G., Bloomfield, R., & Clews, S. (1988). Information influences the pattern of eye fixations during sentence comprehension. Perception, 17, 267-278.
65. Underwood, G., Clews, S., & Everatt, J. (1990). How do readers know where to look next? Local information distributions influence eye fixations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 39-65.
66. Underwood, G., & Radach, R. (1998). Eye guidance and visual information processing: Reading, visual search, picture perception and driving. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 1-27). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
67. Vitu, F. (1991). The existence of a center of gravity effect during reading. Vision Research, 31, 1289-1313.
68. Vitu, F., McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P., & O'Regan, J. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513-3533.
69. Vonk, W., Radach, R., & van Rijn, H. (2000). Eye guidance and the saliency of word beginnings in reading text. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 269-299). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
70. van de Weijgert, E. (1993). Foveal load and peripheral task performance: Tunnel vision or general interference? In D. Brogan, A. Gale, & C. Carr (Eds.), Visual search 2. London: Taylor & Francis.
71. White, S., & Liversedge, S. (2004). Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 52-78.
72. Williams, L. J. (1988). Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 171-191.