Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n + 1 and n + 2 previews simultaneously

Visual Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 697-707

  Angele, Bernhard ^a   Slattery, Timothy J ^b   Yang, Jinmian ^c   Kliegl, Reinhold ^a   Rayner, Keith ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; RETINA FOVEA; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 47249107410     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280802009704     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. and Kliegl, R. (2005) SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, pp. 777-813.
2. Gelman, A. and Hill, J. (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models, Cambridge University Press, New York
3. Kennedy, A., Pynte, J. and Ducrot, S. (2002) Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, pp. 1307-1337.
4. Kliegl, R. (2007) Toward a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, & Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, pp. 530-537.
5. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A. and Engbert, R. (2006) Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, pp. 12-35.
6. Kliegl, R., Risse, S. and Laubrock, J. (2007) Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, pp. 1250-1255.
7. McConkie, G. W. and Rayner, K. (1975) The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, pp. 578-586.
8. McDonald, S. A. (2006) Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal. Vision Research, 46, pp. 4416-4424.
9. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D. and Rayner, K. (2006) Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, pp. 1-56.
10. Radach, R., Glover, L. M. and Vorstius, C. (2007) Exploring the limits of spatially distributed word processing in reading - a new look at N-2 preview effects
11. Rayner, K. (1975) The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, pp. 65-81.
12. Rayner, K. (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, pp. 372-422.
13. Rayner, K. and Juhasz, B. J. (2004) Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, pp. 340-352.
14. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J. and Brown, S. J. (2007) Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, pp. 230-245.
15. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Slattery, T. J. and Reichle, E. D. (2007) Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, & Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, pp. 520-529.
16. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C. and Raney, G. E. (1996) Eye movement control in reading: A comparison to two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, pp. 1188-1200.
17. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L. and Rayner, K. (1998) Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, pp. 125-157.
18. Risse, S., Engbert, R. and Kliegl, R. Eye-movement control in reading: Experimental and corpus-analysis challenges for a computational model. Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements, Psychology Press, Hove, UK
19. Yang, J., Wang, S. and Rayner, K. (2007) Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements