Locating norm diplomacy: Venue change in international norm negotiations

European Journal of International Relations

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 163-186

  Coleman, Katharina P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

anti personnel landmines; constructivism; global institutions; International Relations; norms; responsibility to protect

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875297170     PISSN: 13540661     EISSN: 14603713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354066111411209     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abbott K,Snidal D.Why states act through formal international organizations.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1998;42 (1): 3-32.
2. Acharya A.How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism.International Organization. 2004;58 (2): 239-275.
3. Albin C.Can NGOs enhance the effectiveness of international negotiation?.International Negotiation. 1999;4 (3): 371-387.
4. Albin CJustice and Fairness in International Negotiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001:.
5. AnnanK (1999) Implications of international response to events in Rwanda, Kosovo. Examined by Secretary-General, in address to General Assembly. UN Press Release GA/9595, 20September.
6. Aurisch K.The art of preparing a multilateral conference.Negotiation Journal. 1989;5 (3): 279-288.
7. AxworthyL (2000) Notes for an Address to the 55th UN General Assembly, New York (14 September). Available at: http://webapps.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/minpub/ListPublications.asp?PubTypeID=262&Year=2000&Language=E.
8. Axworthy LNavigating a New World: Canada's Global Future. Toronto: Alfred Knopf; 2003:.
9. Bailey JL.Arrested development: The fight to end commercial whaling as a case of failed norm change.European Journal of International Relations. 2008;14 (2): 289-318.
10. Baumgartner FR,Jones BDAgendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1993:.
11. Beach D.The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: The role and influence of the Council Secretariat.Journal of European Public Policy. 2004;11 (3): 408-439.
12. Bellamy A.Wither the responsibility to protect? Humanitarian intervention and the 2005 World Summit.Ethics and International Affairs. 2006;20 (2): 143-169.
13. Berridge GRDiplomacy: Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:.
14. Busch M.Overlapping institutions, forum shopping, and dispute settlement in international trade.International Organization. 2007;61 (4): 735-761.
15. Capie D.Localization as resistance: The contested diffusion of small arms norms in Southeast Asia.Security Dialogue. 2008;39 (6): 637-658.
16. Carpenter C.Setting the advocacy agenda: Theorizing issue emergence and nonemergence in transnational advocacy networks.International Studies Quarterly. 2007;51 (1): 99-120.
17. Charney JI.Technology and international negotiations.American Journal of International Law. 1982;76 (1): 78-118.
18. Chayes A,Chayes A.On compliance.International Organization. 1993;47 (2): 175-205.
19. Checkel JIdeas and International Political Change: Soviet/Russian Behavior and the End of the Cold War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1997:.
20. Coleman KInternational Organizations and Peace Enforcement: The Politics of International Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
21. Cooper AF,English JInternational Commissions and the Power of Ideas. Thakur RCooper AFEnglish J, ed. Tokyo: United Nations Press; 2005:1-26.
22. Davis CL.Overlapping institutions in trade policy.Perspectives on Politics. 2009;7 (1): 25-31.
23. DFAIT (Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade) (2000) Axworthy launches International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Press release, 14September. Available at: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/iciss-ciise/press1-en.asp.
24. Downs GW,Rocke DM,Barsoom PN.Is good news about compliance good news about cooperation?.International Organization. 1996;50 (3): 379-406.
25. Downs GW,Rocke DM,Barsoom PN.Managing the evolution of multilateralism.International Organization. 1998;52 (2): 397-419.
26. Drezner DAll Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:.
27. Dunn DHDiplomacy at the Highest Levels: the Evolution of International Summitry. Dunn DH, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 1996:.
28. Evans G,Sahnoun M.The responsibility to protect.Foreign Affairs. 2002;81 (6): 99-110.
29. Fearon JD.Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation.International Organization. 1998;52 (2): 269-305.
30. Fearon JD,Wendt AHandbook of International Relations. Carlsnaes WRisse TSimmons BA, ed. London: Sage; 2002:52-72.
31. Federal News Service (1997) Joint news conference with Norwegian Foreign Minister Bjorn Tore Godal and Canadian Foreign Minster Axworthy. 26September.
32. Finnemore M,Sikkink K.International norm dynamics and political change.International Organization. 1998;52 (4): 887-917.
33. Florini A.The evolution of international norms.International Studies Quarterly. 1996;40 (3): 363-389.
34. Franck TThe Power of Legitimacy among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990:.
35. Gilpin RWar and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981:.
36. Greenaway N.The anatomy of a landmines agreement.Vancouver Sun. 1997;:.
37. Grobe C.The power of words: Argumentative persuasion in international negotiations.European Journal of International Relations. 2010;16 (1): 5-29.
38. Guiraudon V.European integration and migration policy: Vertical policy-making as venue shopping.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2000;38 (2): 251-271.
39. Henrikson AKThe Geography of War and Peace: From Death Camps to Diplomats. Flint CR, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:369-394.
40. A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility. New York: UN Department of Public Information; 2004:.
41. Hoffmann MJOzone Depletion and Climate Change: Constructing a Global Response. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 2005:.
42. Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas. Holzgrefe JLKeohane RO, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
43. Hubert DProvidence, RI: Thomas J. Watson Jr Institute for International Studies; 2000:.
44. Hurrell AOn Global Order: Politics, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007:.
45. The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 2001:.
46. Ikenberry GJ,Kupchan CA.Socialization and hegemonic power.International Organization. 1990;44 (3): 283-315.
47. Johnston AI.Treating international institutions as social environments.International Studies Quarterly. 2001;45:487-515.
48. Jupille J,Snidal D.The choice of international institutions: Cooperation, alternatives and strategies. Paper presented at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association; 2005Washington, DC; 2005.
49. Kaufmann JConference Diplomacy: An Introductory Analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1996:.
50. Keck M,Sikkink KActivists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1998:.
51. Kempel W.The negotiations on the Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal: A national delegation perspective.International Negotiation. 1999;4 (3): 413-434.
52. Koh HH.Why do nations obey international law?.Yale Law Journal. 1997;106 (2599): 2615-2634.
53. Koremenos B,Lipson C,Duncan D.The rational design of international institutions.International Organization. 2001;55 (4): 761-799.
54. Krasner SD.State power and the structure of international trade.World Politics. 1976;28 (3): 317-347.
55. Krasner SD.Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier.World Politics. 1991;43 (3): 336-366.
56. Krause K.Multilateral diplomacy, norm building, and UN Conferences: The case of small arms and light weapons.Global Governance. 2002;8 (2): 247-263.
57. Lall AModern International Negotiation: Principles and Practice. New York and London: Columbia University Press; 1966:.
58. Lawson RJ,Gwozdecky M,Sinclair J, et alTo Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines. Cameron MLawson RJTomlin B, ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press; 1998:160-184.
59. Levine MKeeping the Peace: Multidimensional UN Operations in Cambodia and El Salvador. Doyle MWJohnstone IOrr RC, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997:227-254.
60. Marshall PPositive Diplomacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 1997:.
61. Martin L.Interests, power, and multilateralism.International Organization. 1992;46 (4): 765-792.
62. Milgrom PR,North DC,Weingast BR.The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs.Economics and Politics. 1990;2 (1): 1-23.
63. Nadelmann E.Global prohibition regimes: The evolution of norms in international society.International Organization. 1990;44 (4): 479-526.
64. A Fork in the Road or a Roundabout? A Narrative of the UN Reform Process 2003-2005. Oslo: NUPI; 2006:.
65. Ohlin P.Oslo's 'humanitarian' landmine ban a first step towards total ban.Agence France Presse. 1997;:.
66. Payne RA.Persuasion, frames and norm construction.European Journal of International Relations. 2001;7 (1): 37-61.
67. Pfetsch FRInternational Negotiation: Actors, Structure/Process, Values. Berton PKimura HZartman IW, ed. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1999:191-222.
68. PingJ (2005) Revised draft outcome document of the High-Level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly of September 2005, 5August.
69. Prendergast WR.Managing the negotiation agenda.Negotiation Journal. 1990;6 (2): 135-145.
70. Price R.Reversing the gun sights: Transnational civil society targets land mines.International Organization. 1998;52 (3): 613-644.
71. RahmanR (2005) Statement on the Draft Outcome Document of the High-Level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly, 21June. Available at: www.un.int/malaysia/NAM/nam210605.html.
72. Reus-Smit C.International crises of legitimacy.International Politics. 2007;44 (2-3): 157-174.
73. Risse T.'Let's argue!': Communicative action in world politics.International Organization. 2000;54 (1): 1-39.
74. Saunders HH.We need a larger theory of negotiation: The importance of pre-negotiating phases.Negotiation Journal. 1985;1 (3): 249-262.
75. Short N.A review of the Ottawa Process to Ban Landmines.ISIS Briefing Paper 15. 1997;:.
76. Sigal LVNegotiating Minefields: The Landmines Ban in American Politics. New York: Routledge; 2006:.
77. Negotiating International Regimes: Lessons Learned from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). Spector BISjöstedt GZartman IW, ed. London, Dordrecht and Boston: Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff; 1994:.
78. Starkey B,Boyer MA,Wilkenfeld JNegotiating a Complex World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2005:.
79. Stein JGGetting to the Table: The Processes of International Prenegotiation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1989:.
80. Swaab R,Postmes T,Neijens P.Negotiation support systems: Communication and information as antecedents of negotiation settlement.International Negotiation. 2004;9 (1): 59-78.
81. Tallberg J.The power of the chair: Formal leadership in international cooperation.International Studies Quarterly. 2010;54 (1): 241-265.
82. Thakur RThe United Nations, Peace and Security: From Collective Security to the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
83. UNGA (United Nations General Assembly) (2005) Resolution 60/1. 24October.
84. US Newswire (1997) Transcript of White House Briefing on Landmines. 18September.
85. Walker RAMultilateral Conferences: Purposeful International Negotiation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004:.
86. Weiss TGHumanitarian Intervention: Ideas in Action. Cambridge: Polity; 2007:.
87. Wheeler NJSaving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
88. Wheeler NJ.A common victory for humanity? The responsibility to protect after the 2005 World Summit. Paper presented at a conference on 'The UN at Sixty: Celebration or Wake?' at the Faculty of Law; 2005University of Toronto; 2005.
89. Williams JOslo:; 1997:.
90. Williams J,Goose STo Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines. Cameron MLawson RJTomlin B, ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press; 1998:20-47.
91. Zartman IW.In search of common elements in the analysis of the negotiation process.Negotiation Journal. 1988;4 (1): 31-43.