The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: The role and influence of the council secretariat

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 408-439

  Beach, Derek ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

1996 97 IGC; 2000 IGC; Council Secretariat; Eu institutions; Igc leadership model; Treaty reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544374002     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/rjpp13501760410001100279     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Beach D, 2001 Between Law and Politics:The Relationship between the European Court of Justice and EU Member States Copenhagen:DJØF Publishing
2. Beach D, 2002 ‘The negotiation of the Amsterdam Treaty–when theory meets reality’, in F. Laursen (ed.), The Amsterdam Treaty:National Preference Formation, Interstate Bargaining, Outcome and Ratification Odense:Odense University Press 593 637
3. Bercovitch J, 1996a ‘The structure and diversity of mediation in international relations’, in J. Bercovitch and J.Z. Rubin (eds), Mediation in International Relations New York:St Martin’s Press 1 29
4. Bercovitch J, 1996b ‘Introduction:Thinking about mediation’, in J. Bercovitch (ed.), Resolving International Conflicts–The Theory and Practice of Mediation Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner Publishers 1 9
5. Bercovitch J, Houston A, 1996 ‘The study of international mediation:theoretical issues and empirical evidence’, in J. Bercovitch (ed.), Resolving International Conflicts–The Theory and Practice of Mediation Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner Publishers 11 35
6. Caporaso, JA. 1992. ‘International relations theory and multilateralism:the search for foundations’. International Organization, 46 (3):599–632.
7. Carnevale PJ, Arad S, 1996 ‘Bias and impartiality in international mediation’, in J. Bercovitch (ed.), Resolving International Conflicts–The Theory and Practice of Mediation Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner Publishers 39 53
8. Charlemagne 1994 ‘L’équilibre entre les états membres’, in L’équilibre européen. Etudes rassemblées et publiées en hommage B. Niels Ersbøll Brussels:Edition provisoire, pp. 69–78
9. Christiansen, T. 2002. ‘The role of supranational actors in EU treaty reform’. Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (1):33–53.
10. Christiansen, T, and Jørgensen, KE. 1998. ‘Negotiating treaty reform in the European Union:the role of the European Commission’. International Negotiation, 3 (3):435–52.
11. Corbett R, 1998 The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration Basingstoke:Macmillan Press Ltd
12. Cox RW, Jacobsen HK, 1973 ‘The framework for inquiry’, in R.W. Cox, H.K. Jacobsen et al. (eds), The Anatomy of Influence–Decision Making in International Organizations London:Yale University Press 1 36
13. Dinan D, 2000 ‘The Commission and the Intergovernmental Conferences’, in N. Nugent (ed.), At the Heart of the Union:Studies of the European Commission 2 London:Macmillan Press Ltd 250 69
14. Dupont C, Faure G-O, 2002 ‘The negotiation process’, in V.A. Kremenyuk (ed.), International Negotiation:Analysis, Approaches, Issues 2 San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers 39 63
15. Eckstein H, 1975 ‘Case study and theory in political science’, in F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (eds), Handbook of Political Science, Volume 1, Political Science:Scope and Theory Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley
16. Elgström O, 2001 ‘“The honest broker”?–the EU Council Presidency as a mediator’ Paper presented at the 4th Pan-European International Relations Conference, Canterbury, 8–10 September
17. Epstein, L, and Segal, JA. 2000. ‘Measuring issue salience’. American Journal of Political Science, 44 (1):66–83.
18. European Parliament 1996a Summary of the Positions of the Member States and the European Parliament on the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference Luxembourg 30 September
19. European Parliament 1996b Summary of the Positions of the Member States and the European Parliament on the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference Luxembourg 4 December
20. Finnemore, M, and Sikkink, K. 1998. ‘International norm dynamics and political change’. International Organization, 52 (4):887–917.
21. Galloway D, 2001 The Treaty of Nice and Beyond–Realities and Illusions of Power in the EU Sheffield:Sheffield University Press
22. Garrett, G, and Tsebelis, G. 1996. ‘An institutional critique of intergovernmentalism’. International Organization, 50 (2):269–99.
23. Gray M, 2002 ‘Negotiating the Treaty of Amsterdam:the role and influence of the European Commission’, in F. Laursen (ed.), The Amsterdam Treaty:National Preference Formation, Interstate Bargaining, Outcome and Ratification Odense:Odense University Press 381 404
24. Gray M, Stubb A, 2001 ‘The Treaty of Nice:negotiating a poisoned chalice?’ Journal of Common Market Studies Annual Review EU 2001 39 5 23
25. Grieco, J. 1995. ‘The Maastricht Treaty, economic and monetary union and the neo-realist research programme’. Review of International Studies, 21:21–40.
26. Hampson FO, Hart M, 1995 Multilateral Negotiations:Lessons from Arms Control, Trade, and the Environment Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press
27. Hartley T, 2003 The Foundations of European Community Law 5 Oxford:Oxford University Press
28. Hopmann PT, 1996 The Negotiation Process and the Resolution of International Conflicts Columbia:University of South Carolina Press
29. Kleiboer M, 1998 The Multiple Realities of International Mediation Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner Publishers
30. Krasner, SD. 1991. ‘Global communications and national power:life on the Pareto frontier’. World Politics, 43 (3):336–66.
31. Kressel K, Priutt DG, and Associates 1989 Mediation Research:Process and Effectiveness of Third-Party Intervention San Francisco:Jossey-Bass
32. Lax DA, Sebenius JK, 1986 The Manager as Negotiator New York:Free Press
33. Lipsius, J. 1995. ‘The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference’. European Law Review, 20 (3):235–67.
34. Maurer A, 2002 ‘The European Parliament’, in F. Laursen (ed.), The Amsterdam Treaty:National Preference Formation, Interstate Bargaining, Outcome and Ratification Odense:Odense University Press 405 50
35. McDonagh B, 1998 Original Sin in a Brave New World:An Account of the Negotiation of the Treaty of Amsterdam Dublin:Institute of European Affairs
36. Meier KJ, 1989 ‘Bureaucratic leadership in public organizations’, in B.D. Jones (ed.), Leadership and Politics:New Perspectives in Political Science Lawrence:University Press of Kansas 267 88
37. Melchior, J. 1998. ‘Crafting the common will:the IGC 1996 from an Austrian perspective’. International Negotiation, 3 (3):363–87.
38. Metcalfe, D. 1998. ‘Leadership in European Union negotiations:the Presidency of the Council’. International Negotiation, 3:413–34.
39. Midgaard K, Underdal A, 1977 ‘Multiparty conferences’, in D. Druckman (ed.), Negotiations:Social-psychological Perspectives London:Sage Publications 329 46
40. Milward AS, 1993 ‘Conclusions:the value of history’, in A.S. Milward (ed.), The Frontier of National Sovereignty:History and Theory 1945–1992 London:Routledge 182 201
41. Moravcsik A, 1998 The Choice for Europe:Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht Ithaca:Cornell University Press
42. Moravcsik, A. 1999a. ‘A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation’. International Organization, 53 (2):267–306.
43. Moravcsik, A. 1999b. ‘Theory and method in the study of international negotiation:a rejoinder to Oran Young’. International Organization, 53 (4):811–14.
44. Nugent N, 1999 The Government and Politics of the European Union 4 London:Macmillan Press Ltd
45. Petite M, 2000 ‘The IGC and the European Commission’, in E. Best, M. Gray and A. Stubb (eds), Rethinking the European Union:IGC 2000 and Beyond Maastricht:European Institute of Public Administration 61 6
46. Pfetsch FR, 1999 ‘Institutions matter:negotiating the European Union’, in P. Berton, H. Kimura and W.I. Zartmann (eds), International Negotiation:Actors, Structure/Process, Values New York:St Martin’s Press 191 222
47. Piris, J-C. 1999. ‘Does the European Union have a constitution? Does it need one?’. European Law Review, 24:557–85.
48. Pollack, MA. 1997. ‘Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community’. International Organization, 51 (1):99–134.
49. Pollack MA, 2003 The Engines of European Integration:Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the EU Oxford:Oxford University Press
50. Raiffa H, 1982 The Art and Science of Negotiation Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press
51. Sandholtz W, 1992 High-Tech Europe:The Politics of International Cooperation Berkeley:University of California Press
52. Scharpf F, 1997 Games Real Actors Play:Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research Boulder, CO:Westview Press
53. Schout A, Vanhoonacker S, (forthcoming) ‘Nice and the French Presidency’, in F. Laursen (ed.), The Treaty of Nice:Actor Preferences, Bargaining and Institutional Choice Book manuscript in publication process
54. Sebenius JK, 1984 Negotiating the Law of the Sea Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press
55. Sebenius JK, 1991 ‘Negotiation analysis’, in V.A. Kremenyuk (ed.), International Negotiation:Analysis, Approaches, Issues San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers 203 15
56. Sebenius, JK. 1992. ‘Challenging conventional explanations of international cooperation:negotiation analysis and the case of epistemic communities’. International Organization, 46 (1):323–65.
57. Simon HA, 1997 Administrative Behavior:A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations 4 New York:The Free Press
58. Sjöstedt G, 1999 ‘Leadership in multilateral negotiations:crisis or transition?’, in P. Berton, H. Kimura and W.I. Zartmann (eds), International Negotiation:Actors, Structure/Process, Values New York:St Martin’s Press 223 53
59. Stenelo, L.-G. 1972 Mediation in International Relations Lund:Studentlitteratur
60. Stone Sweet A, Sandholtz W, 1998 ‘Integration, supranational governance, and the institutionalization of the European polity’, in W. Sandholtz and A. Stone Sweet (eds), European Integration and Supranational Governance Oxford:Oxford University Press 1 26
61. Stubb A, 1998 Flexible Integration and the Amsterdam Treaty:Negotiating Differentiation in the 1996–97 IGC Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the London School of Economics and Political Science, Michaelmas Term, December
62. Stubb A, 2002 Negotiating Flexibility in the European Union Basingstoke:Palgrave
63. Svensson A-C, 2000 In the Service of the European Union:The Role of the Presidency in Negotiating the Amsterdam Treaty–1995–97 Uppsala:Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis–Skrifter utgivna av statsvetenskapliga föreningen i Uppsala
64. Tallberg J, 2002 ‘The power of the chair in international bargaining’ Paper presented at the 2002 ISA Annual Convention, New Orleans, 24–27 March
65. Tallberg, J. 2003. ‘The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency’. Journal of European Public Policy, 10 (1):1–19.
66. Underdal A, 2002 ‘The outcomes of negotiation’, in V.A. Kremenyuk (ed.), International Negotiation:Analysis, Approaches, Issues 2 San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers 110 26
67. Wall, JA, and Lynn, A. 1993. ‘Mediation:a current review’. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37 (1):160–94.
68. Watkins, M. 1999. ‘Negotiating in a complex world’. Negotiation Journal, 15 (3):245–70.
69. Wehr P, Lederach JP, 1996 ‘Mediating conflict in Central America’, in J. Bercovitch (ed.), Resolving International Conflicts–The Theory and Practice of Mediation Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner Publishers 55 74
70. Westlake M, 1999 The Council of the European Union rev. edn London:John Harper Publishing
71. Young, OR. 1991. ‘Political leadership and regime formation:on the development of institutions in international society’. International Organization, 45 (3):281–308.
72. Young, OR. 1999. ‘Comment on Andrew Moravcsik, “A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation”’. International Organization, 53 (4):805–9.
73. Zartmann WI, 2002 ‘The structure of negotiation’, in V.A. Kremenyuk (ed.), International Negotiation:Analysis, Approaches, Issues 2 San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers 71 84
74. Zartman WI, Berman MR, 1982 The Practical Negotiator New Haven:Yale University Press