Advances in Informed Consent Research

The Ethics of Consent : Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Candilis, Philip J ^a   Lidz, Charles W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Informed consent doctrine; Medical care; Medical ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875257747     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335149.003.0013     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Meisel, A., and L. Roth. 1983. Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: A review and critique of the empirical studies. Arizona Law Review 25(2):265-346.
2. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects. 1979. In The Belmont Report. Washington DC, National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
3. Hougham, G., G. Sachs, D. Danner, J Mintz, M. Patterson, L. Siminoff, L. Roberts, et al. 2003. Empirical research on informed consent with the cognitively impaired. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 25(5):S26-S32.
4. Sachs, G., G. Hougham, J. Sugarman, P. Agre, M. Broome, G. Geller, N. Kass, et al. 2003. Conducting empirical research on informed consent: Challenges and questions. IRB:Ethics and Human Research 25(5):S4-S10.
5. Appelbaum, P., T. Grisso, and C. Hill-Fotouhi. 1997. The MacCAT-T: A clinical tool to assess patients' capacity to make treatment decisions. Psychiatric Services 48(11):1415-19.
6. Carpenter, W., J. Gold, A. Lahti, C. Queern, R. Conley, J. Bartko, J. Kovnick, and P. Appelbaum. 2000. Decisional capacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57(6):540-42.
7. Candilis, P., K. Fletcher, C. Geppert, C. Lidz, and P. Appelbaum. 2008. A direct comparison of research decision-making: mentally ill, medically ill, and non-ill subjects. Schizophrenia Research 99:350-58.
8. Appelbaum, P., and T. Grisso. 2001. MacCAT-CR: MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
9. Dunn, L., P. Candilis, and L. Roberts. 2006. Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32(1):47-68.
10. Moser, D., S. Schultz, S. Arndt, M. Benjamin, F. Fleming, C. Brems, J. Paulsen, P. Appelbaum, and N. Andreasen. 2002. Capacity to provide informed consent for participation in schizophrenia and HIV research. American Journal of Psychiatry 159:1201-7.
11. Jeste, D., C. Depp, and B. Palmer. 2006. Magnitude of impairment in decisional capacity in people with schizophrenia compared to normal subjects: An overview. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32(1):121-28.
12. Jeste, D., B. Palmer, D. Jeste, B. Palmer, P. Appelbaum, S. Golshan, D. Glorioso, et al. 2007. A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research. Archives of General Psychiatry 64(8):966-74.
13. Ghulam, A., M. Kessler, L. Bachmann, U. Haller, T. Kessler. 2006. Patients' satisfaction with the preoperative informed consent procedure: A multicenter questionnaire survey in Switzerland. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 81(3):307-12.
14. Reynolds, W., and R. Nelson. 2007. Risk perception and decision processes underlying informed consent to research participation. Social Science and Medicine 65:2105-15.
15. Sammons, H., M. Atkinson, I. Choonara, and T. Stephenson. 2007. What motivates British parents to consent for research? A questionnaire study. BMC Pediatrics 7:12-18.
16. Appelbaum, P., L. Roth, and C. Lidz. 1982. The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5:319-29.
17. Gurmankin, A., S. Domchek, J. Stopfer, C. Fels, and K. Armstrong. 2005. Patients' resistance to risk information in genetic counseling for BRCA1/2. Archives of Internal Medicine 165(5):523-29.
18. Upadhyay, S., A. Beck, A. Rishi, Y. Amoateng-Adjepong, and C. Manthous. 2008. Patients' predilections regarding informed consent for hospital treatments. Journal of Hospital Medicine 3:6-11.
19. Nixon, I., N. Balaji, O. Hilmy, B. Fu, and C. Brown. 2005. A prospective study comparing conventional methods against a structured method of gaining patients' informed consent for tonsillectomy. Clinical Otolaryngology 30(5):414-17.
20. Kodish, E., M. Eder, R. Noll, K. Ruccione, B. Lange, A. Angiolillo, R. Pentz et al. 2004. Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 291(4):470-75.
21. Jenkins, V., L. Fallowfield, A. Souhami, and M. Sawtell. 1999. How do doctors explain randomized clinical trials to their patients? European Journal of Cancer 35(8):1187-93.
22. Ness, D., S. Kiseling, and C. Lidz. Why does informed consent fail? A discourse analytic approach. Journal of the American Academy of Law and Psychiatry forthcoming.
23. Lidz, C., L. Fisher, and R. Arnold. 1992. The erosion of autonomy in long-term care. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Fins, J., and Z. Shapiro. 2007. Neuroimaging and neuroethics: Clinical and policy considerations. Current Opinion in Neurology 20(6):650-54.
25. Annas, G. 2007. Foreword: Imaging of neuroimaging, neuroethics, and neurolaw. American Journal of Law and Medicine 32(2-3):163-70.
26. Greely, H., and J. Illes. 2007. Neuroscience-based lie-detection: The urgent need for regulation. American Journal of Law and Medicine 33(2-3):377-431.
27. Moreno, J. 2006. Mind wars: Brain research and national defense. Washington, DC:Dana Press.
28. Beresford, E. 1991. Uncertainty and the shaping of medical decisions. Hastings Center Report 24(4):6-11.
29. Brett, A. 1984. Ethical issues in risk factor intervention. American Journal of Medicine 78(4):557-61.
30. Northoff, G. 2006. Neuroscience of decision making and informed consent: An investigation in neuroethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 32:70-76.
31. Holzer, J., D. Gansler, N. Moczynski, and M. Folstein. 1997. Cognitive functions in the informed consent evaluation process: A pilot study. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 25(4):531-40.
32. Basso, M., P. Candilis, J. Johnson, C. Ghormley, D. Combs, and T. Ward. Capacity to make treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis: A potentially remediable deficit. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology Under review.
33. Jeste, D., B. Palmer, S. Golshan, L. Eyler, L. Dunn, T. Meeks, D. Glorioso, I. Fellows, H. Kraemer, and P. Appelbaum. Jan 31, 2008. Multi media consent for research in people with schizophrenia and normal subjects: A randomized controlled trial. Schizophrenia Bulletin [Epub ahead of print].
34. Sypher, B., R. Hall, and G. Rosencrance. 2005. Autonomy, informed consent and advance directives: A study of physician attitudes. West Virginia Medical Journal 101(3):131-33.
35. Mantravadi, A., B. Sheth, R. Gonnering, and D. Covert. 2007. Accuracy of surrogate decision-making in elective surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 33(12):2091-97.
36. Chew-Graham, C., E. Mole, L. Evans, and A. Rogers. 2006. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling 61:381-88.
37. Sorensen, J., P. Rossel, and S. Holm. 2004. Patient-physician communication concerning participation in cancer chemotherapy trials. British Journal of Cancer 90:328-32.
38. Delany, C. 2007. In private practice, informed consent is interpreted as providing explanations rather than offering choices: a qualitative study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 53(3):171-77.
39. Yousuf, R., and A. Fouzi. 2007. Awareness, knowledge, and attitude toward informed consent among doctors in two different cultures in Asia: A cross-sectional comparative study in Malaysia and Kashmir, India. Singapore Medical Journal 48(6):559-65.
40. Fisher, C., C. Cea, P. Davidson, and A. Fried. 2006. Capacity of persons with mental retardation to consent to participate in randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Psychiatry 163(10):1813-20.
41. Woodrow, S., and A. Jenkins. 2006. How thorough is the process of informed consent prior to outpatient gastroscopy? Digestion 73:189-97.
42. Paris, A., C. Cornu, P. Auquier, P. Maison, A. Radauceanu, C. Brandt, M. Salvat-Melis, M. Hommel, and J. Cracowski. 2006. French adaptation and preliminary validation of a questionnaire to evaluate understanding of informed consent documents in phase 1 biomedical research. Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology 20:97-104.
43. Akkad, A., C. Jackson, S. Kenyon, M. Dixon-Woods, N. Taub, and M. Habiba. 2006. Patients' perceptions of written consent: Questionnaire study. British Medical Journal 333(7567):528-30.
44. Akkad, A., C. Jackson, S. Kenyon, M. Dixon-Woods, N. Taub, and M. Habiba. 2004. Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery in obstetrics and gynecology: A questionnaire study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 11:1133-38.
45. Habiba, M., C. Jackson, A. Akkad, S. Kenyon, and M. Dixon-Woods. 2004. Women's accounts of consent to surgery: A qualitative study. Quality and Safety in Health Care 13:422-27.
46. Joffe, S., E. Cook, P. Cleary, J. Clark, and J. Weeks. 2001. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet 358:1772-77.
47. King, N., G. Henderson, L. Churchill, A. Davis, H.S. Chandros, D. Nelson, P. Parham Vetter, et al. 2005. Consent forms and the therapeutic misconception: The example of gene transfer research. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 27(1):1-8.
48. Logue, G., and S. Wear. 1995. A desperate solution: Individual autonomy and the double-blind controlled experiment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20(1):57-64.
49. Minogue, B., G. Palmer-Fernandez, L. Udell, and B Waller. 1995. Individual autonomy and the double-blind controlled experiment: The case of desperate volunteers. Journa Medicine and Philosophy 20(1):43-55.
50. Fureman, I., K. Meyers, A. McLellan, D. Metzger, and G. Woody. 1997. Evaluation of a video supplement to informed consent: Injection drug users and preventive HIV vaccine efficacy trials. AIDS Education and Prevention 9(4):330-41.
51. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments Final Report. 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
52. de Melo-Martin, I., and A. Ho. 2008. Beyond informed consent: The therapeutic misconception and trust. Journal of Medical Ethics 34(3):202-05.
53. Dickert, N., and C. Grady. 1999. What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. New England Journal of Medicine 341(3):198-203.
54. Tishler, C., and S. Bartholomae. 2003. Repeat participation among normal healthy research volunteers: Professional guinea pigs in clinical trials? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46(4):508-20.
55. Russell, M., D. Moralejo, and E. Burgess. 2000. Paying research subjects:Participants' perspectives. Journal of Medical Ethics 16(4):353-66.
56. Almeida, L., B. Azevedo, T. Nunes, M. Vaz-da-Silva, and P. Soares-da-Silva. 2007. Why healthy subjects volunteer for phase 1 studies and how they perceive their participation? European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 63:1085-94.
57. Slomka, J., S. McCurdy, E. Ratliff, S. Timpson, and W. Williams. 2007. Perceptions of financial payment for research participation among African-American drug users in HIV studies. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22(10):1403-09.
58. Kipnis, K. 2003. Seven vulnerabilities in the pediatric research subject. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24(2):107-20.
59. Horn, L. 2007. Research vulnerability: an illustrative case study from the South African mining industry. Developing World Bioethics 7(3):119-27.
60. Appelbaum, P., and C. Lidz. 2008. The therapeutic misconception. In The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics, Emanuel E, C. Grady, R. Crouch, R Lie, F. Miller, D. Wendler eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Snowden, C., J. Garcia, and D. Elbourne. 1997. Understanding randomization:Parental responses to the allocation of alternative treatments in a clinical trial involving their critically ill newborn babies. Social Science and Medicine 45:1337-55.
62. Daugherty, C. 1999. Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: A medical oncology perspective. Journal of Clinical Oncology 17:1601-17.
63. Appelbaum, P.S., C. Lidz, and T. Grisso. 2004. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: Frequency and risk factors. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 26(2):1-8.
64. Kimmelman, J. 2007. The therapeutic misconception at 25: Treatment, research, and confusion. Hastings Center Report 37(6):36-42.
65. Horng, S., and C. Grady. 2003. Misunderstanding in clinical research: Distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation and therapeutic optimism. IRB:Ethics and Human Research 25(1):11-16.
66. Henderson, G., L. Churchill, A. Davis, M. Easter, and C. Grady. 2007. Clinical trials and medical care: Defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Medicine 4(11):e324.
67. Dunn, L., L. Lindamer, B. Palmer, S. Golshan, L. Schneiderman, D. Jeste. 2002. Improving understanding of research consent in middle-aged and elderly patients with psychotic disorders. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 10(2):142-50.
68. Eyler, L., H. Mirzakhanian, and D. Jeste. 2004. A preliminary study of interactive questioning methods to assess and improve understanding of informed consent among patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 75:193-98.
69. Combs, D., S. Adams, T. Woods, M. Basso, and W. Gouvier. 2005. Informed consent in schizophrenia: The use of cues in the assessment of understanding. Schizophrenia Research 77(1):59-63.
70. Sorenson, J., C. Lakon, T. Spinney, and T. Jennings-Grant. 2004. Assessment of a decision aid to assist genetic testing research participants in the informed consent process. Genetic Testing 8(3):336-46.
71. Wilson, K., S. Aaron, K. Vandemheen, P. Hebert, D. McKim, V. Fiset, I. Graham et al. 2005. Evaluation of a decision aid for making choices about intubation and mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patient Education and Counseling 57(1):88-95.
72. Dales, R., A. O'Connor, P. Hebert, K. Sullivan, D. McKim, and H. Llewellyn-Thomas. 1999. Intubation and mechanical ventilation for COPD: Development of an instrument to elicit patient preferences. Chest 116(3):792-800.
73. Graham, I., J. Logan, C. Bennett, J. Presseau, A. O'Connor, S. Mitchell, J. Tetroe et al. 2007. Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 7:20-29.
74. Sugarman, J., P. Lavori, M. Boeger, C. Cain, R. Edsond, V. Morrison, and S. Yeh. 2005. Evaluating the quality of informed consent. Clinical Trials 2(1):34-41.
75. Lavori, P., T. Wilt, and J. Sugarman. 2007. Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent. Clinical Trials 4(6):638-49.
76. Flory, J., and E. Emanuel. 2004. Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 292(13):1593-1601.