|
Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 414-417
|
A prospective study comparing conventional methods against a structured method of gaining patients' informed consent for tonsillectomy
e
NONE
(United Kingdom)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
HOSPITAL PATIENT;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERVIEW;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MEDICAL STAFF;
OUTCOMES RESEARCH;
OUTPATIENT;
PHYSICIAN;
POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE;
POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
RESPONSIBILITY;
TELEPHONE;
TONSILLECTOMY;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
CHILD;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
TONSILLECTOMY;
|
EID: 26244442107
PISSN: 17494478
EISSN: 17494486
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.01021.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (5)
|