Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience

System

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 109-121

  Taguchi, Naoko ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Appropriateness; Formulaic expressions; Interlanguage pragmatics; Oral fluency; Planning time; Pragmatic competence; Routines; Speech rate; Study abroad

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875246332     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2013.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Altenberg G. On the phraseology of spoken English: the evidence of recurrent word-combinations. Phraseology 1998, 101-122. Claredon Press, Oxford. A.P. Cowie (Ed.).
2. Bardovi-Harlig K. Recognition and production of formulas in L2 pragmatics. Understanding Second Language Process 2007, 205-222. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England.
3. Bardovi-Harlig K. Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning 2009, 59:755-795.
4. Blum-Kulka S., Olshtain E. Too many words: length of utterance and pragmatic failure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1986, 8:165-180.
5. Collentine J., Freed B. Learning contexts and its effects on second language acquisition. Special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2004, 26.
6. Conklin K., Schmitt N. Formulaic sequences: are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?. Applied Linguistics 2008, 29:72-89.
7. Coulmas F. Conventional Routine: Exploration in Standarized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech 1981, Mouton, The Hague.
8. Davis J. Resistance to L2 pragmatics in the Australian ESL context. Language Learning 2007, 57:611-649.
9. De Cock S. A recurrent word combination approach to the study of formulae in the speech of native and non-native speakers of English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 1998, 3:59-88.
10. DeKeyser R. Study Abroad as Foreign Language Practice. Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology 2007, pp. 208-226, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. DuFon M., Churchill E. Language Learners in a Study Abroad Context 2006, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
12. Durrant P., Schmitt N. Adult learners' retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research 2010, 26:163-188.
13. Ellis N. Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: the emergence of second language structure. Handbook in SLA 2003, 63-103. C. Doughty, M. Long (Eds.).
14. Ellis N., Simpson-Vlach R., Maynard C. Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: psycholinguistic, corpus linguistic, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 2008, 42:375-396.
15. Hakuta K. Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning 1974, 24:287-298.
16. House J. Toward a model for the analysis of inappropriate responses in native/non- native interactions. Interlanguage Pragmatics 1993, 161-183. Oxford University Press, New York. G. Kasper, S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.).
17. House J. Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1996, 18:225-252.
18. Howarth P. Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics 1998, 19:24-44.
19. JACET (Japan Association of College English Teachers) JACET List of 8,000 Basic Words 2003, JACET, Tokyo.
20. Jiang N., Nekrasova T. The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. Modern Language Journal 2007, 91:433-445.
21. Kecskes I. Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances. Links & Letters 2000, 7:145-161.
22. Kecskes I. Situationally-bound Utterances in L1 and L2 2003, Mouton de Gruyter, Berling.
23. Llanes A. The many faces of study abroad: an update on the research on L2 gains emerged during a study abroad experience. International Journal of Multilingualism 2011, 8:189-215.
24. Miller G. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psycholinguistic Review 1956, 63:81-97.
25. Newell A. Unified Theories of Cognition 1990, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
26. Pawley A., Syder H. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: native-like selection and native-like fluency. Language and Communication 1983, 191-226. Longman, London. J. Richards, R. Schmidt (Eds.).
27. Riggenbach H. Perspective on Fluency 2000, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
28. Riley P. Well, don't blame me! on the interpretation of pragmatic errors. Contrastive Pragmatics 1989, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. W. Olesky (Ed.).
29. Roever C. Testing EFL Pragmatics 2005, Gunter Narr, Frankfurt.
30. Runtime Revolution Ltd. (1997) Scotland, UK: Runtime Revolution Ltd.
31. Schmidt R. Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence. Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition 1983, 137-174. Newbury House, Rowley, MA. N. Wolfson, E. Judd (Eds.).
32. Schmidt R., Frota S. Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: a case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition 1986, 237-326. Newbury House, Rowley, MA. R.R. Day (Ed.).
33. Schmitt N. Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use 2004, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
34. Schmitt N., Dornyei Z., Adolphs S., Durow V. Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences: a longitudinal study. Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use 2004, 55-86. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. N. Schmitt (Ed.).
35. Sinclair J. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation 1991, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. Taguchi N. Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics 2007, 28:113-135.
37. Taguchi N. The role of learning environment in the development of pragmatic comprehension: a comparison of gains between EFL and ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2008, 30:423-452.
38. Taguchi N. Corpus-informed assessment of L2 comprehension of conversational implicatures. TESOL Quarterly 2009, 43:738-749.
39. Thomas J. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 1983, 4:91-112.
40. Warga M. "Je serais tres merciable": formulaic vs. creatively produced speech learners' request-closings. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 2005, 8:67-93.
41. Wildner-Bassett M. Improving Pragmatic Aspects of Learners' Interlanguage 1984, Gunter Narr, Tübingen.
42. Wray A. Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: principles and practice. Applied Linguistics 2000, 21:463-489.
43. Wray A. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.