Comparison of micro-CT and cone beam CT-based assessments for relative difference of grey level distribution in a human mandible

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Taylor, T T ^a   Gans, S I ^a   Jones, E M ^a   Firestone, A R ^a   Johnston, W M ^a   Kim, D G ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alveolar bone; Bone mineralization; Cone beam computed tomography; Micro computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875140559     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/25117764     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ohtani S, Yamamoto T, Iimura A, Takahashi T, Kinoshita Y. Regional differences in D/L aspartic acid ratios in the human mandible as a possible indicator of the bone remodeling rate. Growth Dev Aging 2008; 71: 17-22.
2. Ames MS, Hong S, Lee HR, Fields HW, Johnston WM, Kim DG. Estrogen deficiency increases variability of tissue mineral density of alveolar bone surrounding teeth. Arch Oral Biol 2010; 55: 599-605.
3. Meikle MC. The tissue, cellular, and molecular regulation of orthodontic tooth movement: 100 years after Carl Sandstedt. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28: 221-240.
4. Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yabuuchi T, Ando R, Roberts WE, Garetto LP. Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 889-897.
5. Cavallaro J, Greenstein B, Greenstein G. Clinical methodologies for achieving primary dental implant stability: the effects of alveolar bone density. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 1366-1372.
6. Nanci A, Bosshardt DD. Structure of periodontal tissues in health and disease. Periodontol 2000 2006; 40: 11-28.
7. Martin BR, Burr DB, Sharkey NA. Skeletal tissue mechanics. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1998. p 118.
8. Ruffoni D, Fratzl P, Roschger P, Klaushofer K, Weinkamer R. The bone mineralization density distribution as a fingerprint of the mineralization process. Bone 2007; 40: 1308-1319.
9. Seeman E, Delmas PD. Bone quality-the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2250- 2261.
10. Roschger P, Paschalis EP, Fratzl P, Klaushofer K. Bone mineralization density distribution in health and disease. Bone 2008; 42: 456-466.
11. Boivin G, Farlay D, Bala Y, Doublier A, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD. Influence of remodeling on the mineralization of bone tissue. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20: 1023-1026.
12. Roschger P, Fratzl P, Eschberger J, Klaushofer K. Validation of quantitative backscattered electron imaging for the measurement of mineral density distribution in human bone biopsies. Bone 1998; 23: 319-326.
13. Follet H, Boivin G, Rumelhart C, Meunier PJ. The degree of mineralization is a determinant of bone strength: a study on human calcanei. Bone 2004; 34: 783-789.
14. Boivin G, Meunier PJ. Methodological considerations in measurement of bone mineral content. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: S22-S27.
15. Ritman EL. Current status of developments and applications of micro-CT. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2011; 13: 531-552.
16. Burghardt AJ, Link TM, Majumdar S. High-resolution computed tomography for clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 2179-2193.
17. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707-730.
18. Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 767-771.
19. Hsu JT, Chang HW, Huang HL, Yu JH, Li YF, Tu MG. Bone density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15: 511-519.
20. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 503-506.
21. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 420-425.
22. Kim DG, Christopherson GT, Dong XN, Fyhrie DP, Yeni YN. The effect of microcomputed tomography scanning and reconstruction voxel-size on the accuracy of stereological measurements in human cancellous bone. Bone 2004; 35: 1375-1382.
23. Huja SS, Beck FM. Bone remodeling in maxilla, mandible, and femur of young dogs. Anat Rec 2008; 291: 1-5.
24. Agbaje JO, Jacobs R, Maes F, Michiels K, van Steenberghe D. Volumetric analysis of extraction sockets using cone beam computed tomography: a pilot study on ex vivo jaw bone. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 985-990.
25. Roschger P, Gupta HS, Berzlanovich A, Ittner G, Dempster DW, Fratzl P, et al. Constant mineralization density distribution in cancellous human bone. Bone 2003; 32: 316-323.
26. Yao W, Cheng Z, Koester KJ, Ager JW, Balooch M, Pham A, et al. The degree of bone mineralization is maintained with single intravenous bisphosphonates in aged estrogen-deficient rats and is a strong predictor of bone strength. Bone 2007; 41: 804-812.
27. Nomura Y, Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi T. Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 558-562.
28. Naitoh M, Kurosu Y, Inagaki K, Katsumata A, Noguchi T, Ariji E. Assessment of mandibular buccal and lingual cortical bones in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 545-550.
29. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 79-84.
30. Kwong JC, Palomo JM, Landers MA, Figueroa A, Hans MG. Image quality produced by different cone-beam computed tomography settings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 317-327.
31. Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, Denis K, White S, Coudyzer W, et al. Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Rad 2008; 37: 309- 318.
32. Poiate IA, de Vasconcellos AB, de Santana RB, Poiate E. Threedimensional stress distribution in the human periodontal ligament in masticatory, parafunctional, and trauma loads: finite element analysis. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1859-1867.
33. Ona M, Wakabayashi N. Influence of alveolar support on stress in periodontal structures. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 1087-1091.
34. Marcus R. Clinical review 76: The nature of osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996; 81: 1-5.
35. Busse B, Hahn M, Soltau M, Zustin J, Puschel K, Duda GN, et al. Increased calcium content and inhomogeneity of mineralization render bone toughness in osteoporosis: mineralization, morphology and biomechanics of human single trabeculae. Bone 2009; 45: 1034-1043.
36. Ohba T, Takata Y, Ansai T, Morimoto Y, Tanaka T, Kito S, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between periapical lesions/ sclerotic bone and general bone density as a possible gauge of general health among 80-year-olds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 355-360.