Stair Ascending and Descending in Hip Resurfacing and Large Head Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 684-689

  Queen, Robin M ^a   Newman, Erik T ^a   Abbey, Alicia N ^a   Vail, Thomas Parker ^b   Bolognesi, Michael P ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gait analysis; Hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Metal on metal; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLIMBING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; GROUND REACTION FORCE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KINETICS; MALE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84875107457     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.020     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Steven K., Kevin O., Edmund L., et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:780.
2. Corten K., MacDonald S.J. Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:351.
3. Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Ong K., et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:2606.
4. Crowninshield R.D., Rosenberg A.G., Sporer S.M. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 443:266.
5. Furnes O., Lie S., Espehaug B., et al. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements: A review of 53 698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83:579.
6. Malchau H., Herberts P., Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden: Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 1993, 64:497.
7. Amstutz H.C., Ball S.T., Le Duff M.J., et al. Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 years: results of 2-to 9-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 460:159.
8. Shimmin A.J., Baré J.V. Comparison of functional results of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: a review of the literature. Orthop Clin North Am 2011, 42:143.
9. Lombardi A.V., Berend K.R., Adams J.B. Surface replacement: better baggage gone-affirms. Sem Arthroplasty 2011, 22:59.
10. Murphy T., Trousdale R., Pagnano M., et al. Patients' perceptions of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2009, 32:ii.
11. Lachiewicz P.F. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic's view. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 465:86.
12. Della Valle C.J., Nunley R.M., Raterman S.J., et al. Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:72.
13. Richards C.J., Giannitsios D., Huk O.L., et al. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:96.
14. Marker D.R., Seyler T.M., Jinnah R.H., et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:66.
15. Bartelt R.B., Yuan B.J., Trousdale R.T., et al. The prevalence of groin pain after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:2346.
16. Bin Nasser A., Beaulé P.E., O'Neill M., et al. Incidence of groin pain after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:392.
17. Ollivere B., Darrah C., Barker T., et al. Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:1025.
18. Campbell P., Shimmin A., Walter L., et al. Metal sensitivity as a cause of groin pain in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:1080.
19. Langton D., Jameson S., Joyce T., et al. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:38.
20. Daniel J., Ziaee H., Pradhan C., et al. Six-year results of a prospective study of metal ion levels in young patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:176.
21. Naziri Q., Johnson A.J., Khanuja H.S., et al. Surface replacement: better baggage gone-opposes. Sem Arthroplasty 2011, 22:63.
22. Johnson A.J., Zywiel M.G., Hooper H., et al. Narrowed indications improve outcomes for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2011, 69:S27.
23. Peters C.L., McPherson E., Jackson J.D., et al. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:140.
24. Lombardi A.V., Skeels M.D., Berend K.R., et al. Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469:1.
25. Burroughs B.R., Hallstrom B., Golladay G.J., et al. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes: an in vitro study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:11.
26. Perron M., Malouin F., Moffet H., et al. Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2000, 15:504.
27. Foucher K.C., Hurwitz D.E., Wimmer M.A. Preoperative gait adaptations persist one year after surgery in clinically well-functioning total hip replacement patients. J Biomech 2007, 40:3432.
28. McCrory J., White S., Lifeso R. Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 2001, 14:104.
29. Kyriazis V., Rigas C. Temporal gait analysis of hip osteoarthritic patients operated with cementless hip replacement. Clin Biomech 2002, 17:318.
30. Petersen M.K., Andersen N.T., Mogensen P., et al. Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop 2011, 35:667.
31. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., Ragland P.S., et al. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:100.
32. Lavigne M., Therrien M., Nantel J., et al. The John Charnley Award: The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:326.
33. Queen R.M., Watters T.S., Abbey A.N., et al. Gait symmetry: a comparison of hip resurfacing and jumbo head total hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:680.
34. Shrader M.W., Bhowmik-Stoker M., Jacofsky M.C., et al. Gait and stair function in total and resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:1476.
35. Andriacchi T., Andersson G., Fermier R., et al. A study of lower-limb mechanics during stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980, 62:749.
36. Kirkwood R.N., Culham E.G., Costigan P. Hip moments during level walking, stair climbing, and exercise in individuals aged 55 years or older. Phys Ther 1999, 79:360.
37. Nadeau S., McFadyen B.J., Malouin F. Frontal and sagittal plane analyses of the stair climbing task in healthy adults aged over 40 years: what are the challenges compared to level walking?. Clin Biomech 2003, 18:950.
38. Foucher K.C., Hurwitz D.E., Wimmer M.A. Do gait adaptations during stair climbing result in changes in implant forces in subjects with total hip replacements compared to normal subjects?. Clin Biomech 2008, 23:754.
39. Lamontagne M., Beaulieu M.L., Beaulé P.E. Comparison of joint mechanics of both lower limbs of THA patients with healthy participants during stair ascent and descent. J Orthop Res 2011, 29:305.
40. Yu B.Q.R., Shrodt L.A. Effect of external marker sets on between-day repeatability of knee kinematics and kinetics in stair climbing and level walking. Res Sports Med 2003, 11:209.
41. Ferber R., IM D., Williams D., et al. A Comparison of between-day reliability of discrete 3-D lower extremity variables in runners. J Orthop Res 2002, 20:1139.
42. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Medical Device Alert: All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements (MDA/2012/008). 28 February 2012.
43. Stolk J., Verdonschot N., Huiskes R. Stair climbing is more detrimental to the cement in hip replacement than walking. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 405:294.
44. Kassi J.P., Heller M.O., Stoeckle U., et al. Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro. J Biomech 2005, 38:1143.
45. Bouffard V., Nantel J., Therrien M., et al. Center of mass compensation during gait in hip arthroplasty patients: comparison between large diameter head total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. Rehab Res Prac 2011.
46. Long W.T., Dorr L.D., Healy B., et al. Functional recovery of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993, 288:73.
47. Stacoff A., Diezi C., Luder G., et al. Ground reaction forces on stairs: effects of stair inclination and age. Gait Posture 2005, 21:24.