Patients' perceptions of hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Orthopedics

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 730-733

  Murphy, Todd P ^a   Trousdale, Robert T ^a   Pagnano, Mark W ^a   Mabry, Tad M ^a   Sierra, Rafael J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCEPTION; RANGE OF MOTION; SOFT TISSUE INJURY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 70450197250     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090818-10     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(1):28-39.
2. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(2):177-184. (Pubitemid 38386853)
3. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(5):592-600.
4. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(2):167-170.
5. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; (453):123-131. (Pubitemid 44900970)
6. Likert RA. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932; (140):1-55.
7. Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Research Methods in Education: An Introduction. 8th ed. London, England: Allyn and Bacon; 2004.