Surface Replacement: Better Baggage Gone-Opposes

Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 63-65

  Naziri, Qais ^a   Johnson, Aaron J ^a   Khanuja, Harpal S ^a   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hip arthroplasty; Hip osteoarthritis; Hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Resurfacing; Surgical indications

Indexed keywords

METAL; METAL ION;

ARTICLE; BONE NECROSIS; BONE TISSUE; GAIT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP PAIN; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEARNING CURVE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERTHES DISEASE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; PSEUDOTUMOR; RANGE OF MOTION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TISSUE PRESERVATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79959810784     PISSN: 10454527     EISSN: 15584437     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2011.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., Ragland P.S., et al. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:100-108.
2. Haddad FS, Bull J: Hip resurfacing has superior sustained functional outcomes when compared to total hip arthroplasty, paper presented at the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting, Abstract 428, San Francisco, CA, 2008.
3. Lavigne M, Vendittoli P, Roy A, et al: A randomized study comparing surface replacement arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty, paper presented at the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting, Abstract 384, San Francisco, CA, 2008.
4. Mont M.A., Marker D.R., Smith J.M., et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:66-71.
5. Pollard T.C., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:592-600.
6. Vail T.P., Mina C.A., Yergler J.D., et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 453:123-131.
7. Mont M.A., McGrath M.S., Ulrich S.D., et al. Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformities or implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(suppl 3):45-51.
8. Amstutz H.C., Beaulé P.E., Dorey F.J., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: Two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A 2004, 28-39.
9. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: A review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(suppl 1):36-43.
10. Daniel J., Ziaee H., Kamali A., et al. Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:20-27.
11. McBryde C.W., Revell M.P., Thomas A.M., et al. The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:920-926.
12. McBryde C.W., Theivendran K., Thomas A.M., et al. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:105-112.
13. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., Ulrich S.D., et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 465:63-70.
14. Prosser G.H., Yates P.J., Wood D.J., et al. Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: Evaluation of risk factors for early revision. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:66-71.
15. Schmalzried T.P., Silva M., de la Rosa M.A., et al. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:200-204.
16. Nunley R.M., Zhu J., Brooks P.J., et al. The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:382-391.
17. Shimmin AJ, Graves SE, Mathis KB: The effect of operative volume on the outcome of hip resurfacing, paper presented at the 76th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Las Vegas, NV, 2009.
18. Thomas P., Braathen L.R., Dorig M., et al. Increased metal allergy in patients with failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty and peri-implant T-lymphocytic inflammation. Allergy 2009, 64:1157-1165.
19. Pandit H., Glyn-Jones S., McLardy-Smith P., et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:847-851.
20. Campbell P., Ebramzadeh E., Nelson S., et al. Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:2321-2327.