Local Network Patterns in Protein-Protein Interfaces

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Luo, Qiang ^a   Hamer, Rebecca ^b   Reinert, Gesine ^b   Deane, Charlotte M ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; LOCAL NETWORK PATTERN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERFACE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84874789142     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057031     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bahadur R, Zacharias M, (2008) The interface of protein-protein complexes: Analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 65: 1059-1072.
2. Nussinov R, Tsai CJ, (2005) Protein-protein interactions: principles and predictions. Physical Biology 2: e01.
3. Boehr DD, Wright PE, (2008) Biochemistry. how do proteins interact? Science 320: 1429-1430.
4. Keskin O, Gursoy A, Ma B, Nussinov R, (2008) Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact? Chemical Reviews 108: 1225-1244.
5. Tuncbag N, Kar G, Keskin O, Gursoy A, Nussinov R, (2009) A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces. Briefings in Bioinformatics 10: 217-232.
6. Tsai CJ, Xu D, Nussinov R, (1997) Structural motifs at protein-protein interfaces: protein cores versus two-state and three-state model complexes. Protein Science 6: 1793-1805.
7. Vanhee P, Stricher F, Baeten L, Verschueren E, Lenaerts T, et al. (2009) Protein-peptide interactions adopt the same structural motifs as monomeric protein folds. Structure 17: 1128-1136.
8. Jones S, Thornton JM, (1996) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93: 13-20.
9. Halperin I, Wolfson H, Nussinov R, (2004) Protein-protein interactions; coupling of structurally conserved residues and of hot spots across interfaces. implications for docking. Structure 12: 1027-1038.
10. Oldfield CJ, Cheng Y, Cortese MS, Romero P, Uversky VN, et al. (2005) Coupled folding and binding with alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition elements and dag. Biochemistry 44: 12454-12470.
11. Ma B, Elkayam T, Wolfson H, Nussinov R, (2003) Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 5772-5777.
12. Rahat O, Yitzhaky A, Schreiber G, (2008) Cluster conservation as a novel tool for studying protein-protein interactions evolution. Proteins 71: 621-630.
13. Reichmann D, Rahat O, Albeck S, Meged R, Dym O, et al. (2005) The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 57-62.
14. Rahat O, Alon U, Levy Y, Schreiber G, (2009) Understanding hydrogen-bond patterns in proteins using network motifs. Bioinformatics 25: 2921-2928.
15. Torrance JW, Holliday GL, Mitchell JB, Thornton JM, (2007) The geometry of interactions between catalytic residues and their substrates. Journal of Molecular Biology 369: 1140-1152.
16. DeLano W, (2002) Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 12: 14-20.
17. Kortemme T, Baker D, (2004) Computational design of protein-protein interactions. Current opinion in chemical biology 8: 91-97.
18. Kortemme T, Baker D, (2002) A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 14116-14121.
19. Eyal E, Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Sobolev V, Pietrokovski S, (2007) A pair-to-pair amino acids substitution matrix and its applications for protein structure prediction. Proteins 67: 142-153.
20. Jones S, Thornton JM (1997) Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. Journal of Molecular Biology: 121-132.
21. Jones S, Thornton JM (1997) Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. Journal of Molecular Biology: 133-143.
22. Madaoui H, Guerois R, (2008) Coevolution at protein complex interfaces can be detected by the complementarity trace with important impact for predictive docking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 7708-7713.
23. Hamer R, Luo Q, Armitage JP, Reinert G, Deane CM, (2010) i-patch: Interprotein contact prediction using local network information. Proteins 78: 2781-2797.
24. Liu S, Gao Y, Vakser IA, (2008) Dockground protein-protein docking decoy set. Bioinformatics 24: 2634-2635.
25. Eisenhaber F, Argos P, (1996) Hydrophobic regions on protein surfaces: definition based on hydration shell structure and a quick method for their computation. Protein Engineering 9: 1121-1133.
26. Xu X, Zhang J, Small M, (2008) Superfamily phenomena and motifs of networks induced from time series. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 19601-19605.
27. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, 8th edition.
28. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C, (1995) Scop: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. Journal of Molecular Biology 247: 536-40.
29. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Research 28: 235-42.
30. Bahadur R, Chakrabarti P, Rodier F, Janin J, (2004) A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. Journal of Molecular Biology 336: 943-955.
31. Buckland M, Gey F, (1994) The relationship between recall and precision. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(1): 12-19.
32. Fawcett T, (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letter 27(8): 861-874.