Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1542-1557

  Bell, Raoul ^a   Röer, Jan P ^a   Dentale, Sandra ^a   Buchner, Axel ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attentional capture; Auditory distraction; Cross modal attention; Irrelevant speech effect; Orienting response

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECALL; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874750442     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028459     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Allport, A. (1988). What concept of consciousness? In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.), Consciousness in contemporary science (pp. 159-182). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (Release 1) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
4. Baddeley, A., & Larsen, J. D. (2003). The disruption of STM: A response to our commentators. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1301-1306. doi:10.1080/02724980343000530
5. Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiplecomponent model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp.28-61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6. Banbury, S. P., & Berry, D. C. (1997). Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 181-195. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.3.3.181
7. Banbury, S. P., Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors, 43, 12-29. doi:10.1518/001872001775992462
8. Barry, R. J., Cocker, K. I., Anderson, J. W., Gordon, E., & Rennie, C. (1992). Does the N100 evoked potential really habituate? Evidence from a paradigm appropriate to a clinical setting. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 9-16. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(92)90014-3
9. Beaman, C. P. (2005). Auditory distraction from low-intensity noise: A review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1041-1064. doi:10.1002/acp.1134
10. Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (1997). Role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing-state hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 459-471. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.459
11. Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2007). Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults. Memory & Cognition, 35, 352-364. doi:10.3758/BF03193456
12. Bell, R., Dentale, S., Buchner, A., & Mayr, S. (2010). ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect. Psychophysiology, 47, 1182-1191. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01029.x
13. Bell, R., Mund, I., & Buchner, A. (2011). Disruption of short-term memory by distractor speech: Does content matter? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 146-168. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.483769
14. Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664-1677. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1664
15. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: Evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1119-1122. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02527.x
16. Bridges, A. M., & Jones, D. M. (1996). Word dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech: Phonological confusions or changing state? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 919-939. doi:10.1080/027249896392360
17. Buchner, A., Bell, R., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2008). Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect. Memory & Cognition, 36, 617-628. doi:10.3758/MC.36.3.617
18. Buchner, A., & Erdfelder, E. (2005). Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 33, 86-97. doi:10.3758/BF03195299
19. Buchner, A., Irmen, L., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the "irrelevant speech" effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 765-779. doi:10.1080/027249896392586
20. Buchner, A., Mehl, B., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2006). Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1055-1062. doi:10.3758/BF03193252
21. Buchner, A., Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & Mehl, B. (2004). Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 32, 722-731. doi:10.3758/BF03195862
22. Budd, T. W., Barry, R. J., Gordon, E., Rennie, C., & Mitchie, P. T. (1998). Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: Habituation vs. refractoriness. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 31, 51-68. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(98)00040-3
23. Campbell, T., Beaman, C. P., & Berry, D. C. (2002). Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption. Memory, 10, 199-214. doi:10.1080/09658210143000335
24. Campbell, T., Winkler, I., & Kujala, T. (2005). Disruption of immediate memory and brain processes: An auditory ERP protocol. Brain Research Protocols, 14, 77-86. doi:10.1016/j.brainresprot.2004.11.001
25. Campbell, T., Winkler, I., & Kujala, T. (2007). N1 and the mismatch negativity are spatiotemporally distinct ERP components: Disruption of immediate memory by auditory distraction can be related to N1. Psychophysiology, 44, 530-540. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00529.x
26. Campbell, T., Winkler, I., Kujala, T., & Näätänen, R. (2003). The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: Evidence from token set size effects. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 39 - 47. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.001
27. Chein, J. M., & Fiez, J. A. (2010). Evaluating models of working memory through the effects of concurrent irrelevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 117-137. doi:10.1037/a0018200
28. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human informationprocessing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163-191. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163
30. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. London, England: Oxford University Press.
31. Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62-101). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32. Ellermeier, W., & Zimmer, K. (1997). Individual differences in susceptibility to the "irrelevant speech effect." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2191-2199. doi:10.1121/1.419596
33. Elliott, E. M., & Cowan, N. (2001). Habituation to auditory distractors in a cross-modal, color-word interference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 654-667. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.654
34. Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5, 151-166. doi:10.1159/000013877
35. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604. doi:10.1162/089892998562997
36. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
37. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00019-7
38. Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithmbased neural model? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736-749. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.736
39. Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of shortterm memory by changing and deviant sounds: Support for a duplexmechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050-1061. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1050
40. Jones, D. (1993). Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 87-104). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369-381. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.369
42. Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Mosdell, N. A. (1997). The role of habituation in the disruption of recall performance by irrelevant sound. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 549 -564. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02657.x
43. Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Murray, A. C. (1993). Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation. Memory & Cognition, 21, 318-328. doi:10.3758/BF03208264
44. Jones, D., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 44A, 645-669. doi:10.1080/14640749208401304
45. Kopp, F., Schröger, E., & Lipka, S. (2004). Neural networks engaged in short-term memory rehearsal are disrupted by irrelevant speech in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 354, 42- 45. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2003.09.065
46. Lange, E. B. (2005). Disruption of attention by irrelevant stimuli in serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 513-531. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.07.002
47. Larsen, J. D., & Baddeley, A. (2003). Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: Do they have a common source? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1249 -1268. doi:10.1080/02724980244000765
48. Larsen, J. D., Baddeley, A., & Andrade, J. (2000). Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: Implications for models of short-term verbal memory. Memory, 8, 145-157. doi:10.1080/096582100387579
49. LeCompte, D. C., Neely, C. B., & Wilson, J. R. (1997). Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: The relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 472-483. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.472
50. Little, J. S., Martin, F. H., & Thomson, R. H. S. (2010). Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: Controlling acoustic variation. Biological Psychology, 85, 62-70. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.05.004
51. Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2008). Auditory distraction in semantic memory: A process-based approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 682-700. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.002
52. Miles, C., Jones, D. M., & Madden, C. A. (1991). Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 578-584. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.578
53. Morris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990). Habituation to irrelevant speech: Effects on a visual short-term memory task. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 291-297. doi:10.3758/BF03205003
54. Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201-233. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00078407
55. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. W. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x
56. Neath, I. (1999). Modelling the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech on order information. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 410-418. doi:10.1080/002075999399765
57. Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 403-423. doi:10.3758/BF03214356
58. Norris, D., Baddeley, A. D., & Page, M. P. A. (2004). Retroactive effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall from short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1093-1105. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.1093
59. Öhman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention and learning: An information processing perspective. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. Van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 443-471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. G. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall. Psychological Review, 105, 761-781. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.761-781
61. Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. G. (2003). The irrelevant sound effect: What needs modelling, and a tentative model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1289-1300. doi:10.1080/02724980343000233
62. Rinne, T., Särkkä, A., Degerman, A., Schröger, E., & Alho, K. (2006). Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention. Brain Research, 1077, 135-143. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.043
63. Röer, J. P., Bell, R., Dentale, S., & Buchner, A. (2011). The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 39, 839-850. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0070-z
64. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90521-7
65. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1986). Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 263-265.
66. SanMiguel, I., Corral, M.-J., & Escera, C. (2008). When loading working memory reduces distraction: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1131-1145. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20078
67. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71-87. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00013-5
68. Shelton, J. T., Elliott, E. M., Eaves, S. D., & Exner, A. L. (2009). The distracting effects of a ringing cell phone: An investigation of the laboratory and the classroom setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 513-521. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.001
69. Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York, NY: Pergamon.
70. Sokolov, E. N., Spinks, J. A., Näätänen, R., & Lyytinen, H. (2002). The orienting response in information processing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Sörqvist, P., Nöstl, A., & Halin, N. (2012). Working memory capacity modulates habituation rate: Evidence from a cross-modal auditory distraction paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 245-250. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0203-9
72. Thompson, R. F., & Spencer, W. A. (1966). Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychological Review, 73, 16-43. doi:10.1037/h0022681
73. Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (1998). Role of habituation in the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence from the effects of token set size and rate of transition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 659-671. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.659
74. Tremblay, S., Nicholls, A. P., Alford, D., & Jones, D. M. (2000). The irrelevant sound effect: Does speech play a special role? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1750-1754. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1750
75. Vachon, F., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2012). Broken expectations: Violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 164-177. doi:10.1037/a0025054
76. Warren, R. M. (1961). Illusory changes of distinct speech upon repetition-The verbal transformation effect. British Journal of Psychology, 52, 249-258. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1961.tb00787.x
77. Weisz, N., & Schlittmeier, S. J. (2006). Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1097-1105. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj051
78. Woods, D. L., & Elmasian, R. (1986). The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials, 65, 447- 459. doi:10.1016/0168-5597(86)90024-9