N1 and the mismatch negativity are spatiotemporally distinct ERP components: Disruption of immediate memory by auditory distraction can be related to N1

Psychophysiology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 530-540

  Campbell, Tom ^a   Winkler, István ^a,b   Kujala, Teija ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Auditory distraction; Auditory mismatch negativity MMN; Auditory N1; Irrelevant sound effect; Selective attention; Serial recall

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; TEMPORAL CORTEX; TOPOGRAPHY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL;

EID: 34250190251     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00529.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alcaini, M., Giard, M. H., Thévenet, M. Pernier, J. (1994). Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory-evoked response. Psychophysiology, 31, 611 615.
2. Alho, K. (1995). Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear and Hearing, 16, 38 51.
3. Barry, R. A., Cocker, K. L., Anderson, J. W., Gordon, E. Rennie, C. (1992). Does the N100 evoked potential really habituate? Evidence from a paradigm appropriate to a clinical setting. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 9 12.
4. Butler, R. A. (1968). Effects of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 945 950.
5. Campbell, T. A. (2005). The cognitive neuroscience of auditory distraction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 3 5.
6. Campbell, T. A., Beaman, C. P. Berry, D. C. (2002). Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption. Memory, 10, 199 214.
7. Campbell, T. A., Winkler, I. Kujala, T. (2005). Disruption of immediate memory and brain processes: An auditory ERP protocol. Brain Research Protocols, 14, 77 86.
8. Campbell, T. A., Winkler, I., Kujala, T. Näätänen, R. (2003). The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: Evidence from token set effects. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 39 47.
9. Cowan, N., Winkler, I., Teder, W. Näätänen, R. (1993). Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 909 921.
10. de Boor, C. (1978). A practical guide to splines. New York : Springer-Verlag.
11. Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E. Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event related brain potentials. Audiology and Neuro-otology, 5, 151 166.
12. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M. Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355 373.
13. Gisselgård, J., Petersson, K. M., Baddeley, A. D. Ingvar, M. (2003). The irrelevant speech effect: A PET study. Neuropsychologia, 241, 1899 1911.
14. Gisselgård, J., Petersson, K. M. Ingvar, M. (2004). The irrelevant speech effect and working memory load. NeuroImage, 41, 1899 1911.
15. Gisselgård, J., Uddén, J., Ingvar, M. Petersson, K. M. (2007). Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: A serial recognition paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 124, 356 369.
16. Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F. Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 3, 736 749.
17. Jacobsen, T. Schröger, E. (2001). Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch? Psychophysiology, 38, 723 727.
18. Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., Horenkamp, T. Winkler, I. (2003). Mismatch negativity to pitch change: Varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event related brain potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 344, 79 82.
19. Javitt, D. C. (2000). Intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity dysfunction in schizophrenia. Audiology and Neuro-otology, 5, 207 215.
20. Javitt, D. C., Steinschneider, M., Schroeder, C. E. Arezzo, J. C. (1996). Role of cortical N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in auditory sensory memory and mismatch negativity generation: implications for schizophrenia. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93, 11962 11967.
21. Jones, D. M. (1993). Objects, streams and threads of auditory attention. In : A. D. Baddeley L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness and control. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
22. Jones, D. M. (1994). Disruption of memory for lip-read lists by irrelevant speech: Further support for the changing-state hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 143 160.
23. Jones, D. M., Alford, D. K., Bridges, A., Tremblay, S. Macken, W. J. (1999). Organizational factors in attention: The interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 464 473.
24. Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Macken, W. J., Banbury, S. Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference from auditory degraded stimuli: Linear effects of stimulus mis-match in the irrelevant sequence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1082 1088.
25. Jones, D. M., Beaman, C. P. Macken, W. J. (1996). The object-oriented episodic record model. In S. E. Gathercole (Ed.), Models of short-term memory. Hove, UK : Psychology Press.
26. Jones, D. M., Farrand, P., Stuart, G. Morris, N. (1995). Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1008 1018.
27. Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J. Mosdell, N. (1997). The role of habituation in the disruption of recall performance by irrelevant sound. The British Journal of Psychology, 88, 549 564.
28. Jones, D. M., Madden, C. Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 645 669.
29. Jones, D. M., Saint-Aubin, J. Tremblay, S. (1999). Modulation of the irrelevant sound effect by organizational factors: Further evidence from streaming by location. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 545 554.
30. Jääskeläinen, I. P., Ahveninen, J., Bonmassar, G., Dale, A. M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Levanen, S., et al 2004). Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 6809 6814.
31. Kopp, F., Schröger, E. Lipka, S. (2004). Neural networks engaged in short-term memory rehearsal are disrupted by irrelevant speech in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 354, 42 45.
32. Kopp, F., Schröger, E. Lipka, S. (2006). Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 188 203.
33. Korzyukov, O., Alho, K., Kujala, A., Gumenyuk, V., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Virtanen, J., et al 1999). Electromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex generated by sensory-memory based processing of tone-frequency changes. Neuroscience Letters, 276, 169 172.
34. Korzyukov, O., Winkler, I., Gumenyuk, V. Alho, K. (2003). Processing abstract auditory features in the human auditory cortex. NeuroImage, 20, 2245 2258.
35. Laitinen, J. Campbell, T. (2006) Distracting effects of ignored deviants within the optimal paradigm for elicitation of the mismatch negativity? Manuscript in preparation.
36. Lange, E. B. (2005). Disruption of attention by irrelevant stimuli in serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 513 531.
37. LeCompte, D. C. (1995). An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 391 397.
38. Martín-Loeches, M. Sommer, W. (1998). Testing models of the irrelevant speech effect on working memory with event-related potentials. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 206, 1 22.
39. May, P. J. C. Tiitinen, H. (2001). Human cortical processing of auditory events over time. NeuroReport, 12, 573 577.
40. May, P. J. C. Tiitinen, H. (2004). The MMN is a derivative of the auditory N100 response. Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, 20, 1 5.
41. Moore, D. R. (2003). Cortical neurons signal sound novelty. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 330 332.
42. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K. Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313 329.
43. Näätänen, R., Jacobsen, T. Winkler, I. (2005). Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): A review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 42, 25 32.
44. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P. Reinikainen, K. (1989). Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man? Neuroscience Letters, 107, 347 352.
45. Näätänen, R., Pakarinen, S., Rinne, T. Takegata, R. (2000). The mismatch negativity (MMN) towards the optimal paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 140 144.
46. Näätänen, R. Picton, T. W. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375 425.
47. Näätänen, R. Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 826 859.
48. Oceák, A., Winkler, I., Sussman, E. Alho, K. (2006). Loudness summation and the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential in humans. Psychophysiology, 43, 13 20.
49. Opitz, B., Schröger, E. von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Sensory and cognitive mechanisms for preattentive change detection in auditory cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 531 535.
50. Paavilainen, P., Simola, J., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R. Winkler, I. (2001). Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology, 38, 359 365.
51. Pekkonen, E. (2000). Mismatch negativity in aging and in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Audiology and Neuro-otology, 5, 216 224.
52. Pekkonen, E., Hirvonen, J., Ahveninen, J., Kähkönen, S., Kaakkola, S., Huttunen, J., et al 2002). Memory-based comparison process not attenuated by haloperidol: A combined MEG and EEG study. NeuroReport, 13, 177 181.
53. Rinne, T., Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Cowan, N., Maclin, E., Stinard, A., et al 1999). Scalp-recorded optical signals make sound processing in the auditory cortex visible. NeuroImage, 10, 620 624.
54. Rinne, T., Särkkä, A., Degerman, A., Schröger, E. Alho, K. (2006). Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention. Brain Research, 1077, 135 143.
55. Saarinen, J., Paavilainen, P., Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M. Näätänen, R. (1992). Representation of abstract stimulus attributes in human brain. NeuroReport, 3, 1149 1151.
56. Schröger, E. Wolff, C. (1996). Mismatch response to changes in sound location. NeuroReport, 7, 3005 3008.
57. Tremblay, S. Jones, D. M. (1998). The role of habituation in the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence from the role of token set size and rate of habituation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 659 671.
58. Ulanovsky, N. (2004) Neuronal adaptation in cat auditory cortex. Doctoral dissertation. Jerusalem, Israel: Hebrew University.
59. Ulanovsky, N., Las, L., Farkas, D. Nelken, I. (2004). Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10440 10453.
60. Ulanovsky, N., Las, L. Nelken, I. (2003). Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 391 398.
61. Umbricht, D., Schmid, L., Koller, R., Vollenweider, F. X., Hell, D. Javitt, D. C. (2000). Ketamine-induced deficits in auditory and visual context-dependent processing in healthy volunteers. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 1139 1147.
62. Valtonen, J., Mäkinen, V., May, P. J. C. Tiitinen, H. (2003). Visual short-term memory load affects sensory processing of irrelevant sounds in human auditory cortex. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 358 367.
63. Virtanen, J., Ahveninen, J., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Näätänen, R. Pekkonen, E. (1998). Replicability of MEG and EEG measures of the auditory N1/N1m-response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 291 298.
64. Virtanen, J., Rinne, T., Ilmoniemi, R. J. Näätänen, R. (1996). MEG-compatible multichannel EEG electrode array. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 568 570.
65. Winkler, I., Tervaniemi, M. Näätänen, R. (1997). Two separate codes for missing-fundamental pitch in the human auditory cortex. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1072 1082.
66. Woods, D. L. Elmasian, R. (1986). The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 65, 447 459.
67. Yabe, H., Tervaniemi, M., Sinkkonen, J., Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J. Näätänen, R. (1998). Temporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain. Psychophysiology, 35, 615 619.