Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention

Brain Research

Volumn 1077, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 135-143

  Rinne, Teemu ^a,b   Särkkä, Anna ^a   Degerman, Alexander ^a   Schröger, Erich ^c   Alho, Kimmo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory change detection; Distraction; Event related potential; MMN; N1; P3a

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; BEHAVIOR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HEARING ACUITY; MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION METHOD; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 33644955283     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.043     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. J. Ahveninen, S. Kähkönen, S. Pennanen, J. Liesivuori, R.J. Ilmoniemi, and I.P. Jääskeläinen Tryptophan depletion effects on EEG and MEG responses suggest serotonergic modulation of auditory involuntary attention in humans NeuroImage 16 2002 1052 1061
2. K. Alho, I. Winkler, C. Escera, M. Huotilainen, J. Virtanen, I.P. Jääskeläinen, E. Pekkonen, and R.J. Ilmoniemi Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings Psychophysiology 35 1998 211 224
3. S. Berti, U. Roeber, and E. Schröger Bottom-up influences on working memory: behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength Exp. Psychol. 51 2004 249 257
4. R.A. Butler Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44 1968 945 950
5. B.J. Dyson, and P.T. Quinlan Stimulus processing constraints in audition J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30 2004 1117 1131
6. C. Escera, K. Alho, I. Winkler, and R. Näätänen Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10 1998 590 604
7. C. Escera, K. Alho, E. Schröger, and I. Winkler Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials Audiol. Neuro-otol. 5 2000 151 166
8. D. Friedman, Y.M. Cycowicz, and H. Gaeta The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25 2001 355 373
9. T. Jacobsen, T. Horenkamp, and E. Schröger Preattentive memory-based comparison of sound intensity Audiol. Neuro-otol. 8 2003 338 346
10. D. Jones, and W. Macken Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: implications for phonological coding in working memory J. Exper. Psychol., Learn., Mem., Cogn. 19 1993 369 381
11. D. Jones, C. Madden, and C. Miles Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 44A 1992 645 659
12. R.T. Knight, and D. Scabini Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15 1998 3 13
13. O. Korzyukov, K. Alho, A. Kujala, V. Gumenyuk, R.J. Ilmoniemi, J. Virtanen, J. Kropotov, and R. Näätänen Electromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex generated by sensory-memory based processing of tone-frequency changes Neurosci. Lett. 276 1999 169 172
14. S. Levänen, A. Ahonen, R. Hari, L. McEvoy, and M. Sams Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently Cereb. Cortex. 6 1996 288 296
15. D.W. Massaro, M.M. Cohen, and W.L. Idson Recognition masking of auditory lateralization and pitch judgments J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59 1976 434 441
16. R.D. Melara, S. Chen, and H. Wang Inhibiting change: effects of memory on auditory selective attention Cogn. Brain Res. 25 2005 431 442
17. D.A. Nelson, M.E. Stanton, and R.L. Freyman A general equation describing frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73 1983 2117 2123
18. R. Näätänen Attention and Brain Function 1992 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ
19. R. Näätänen, and T. Picton The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure Psychophysiology 24 1987 375 425
20. R. Näätänen, and I. Winkler The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience Psychol. Bull. 6 1999 826 859
21. R. Näätänen, M. Sams, K. Alho, P. Paavilainen, K. Reinikainen, and E.N. Sokolov Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69 1988 523 531
22. R. Näätänen, P. Paavilainen, K. Alho, K. Reinikainen, and M. Sams Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? Neurosci. Lett. 98 1989 217 221
23. R. Näätänen, T. Jacobsen, and I. Winkler Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence Psychophysiology 42 2005 25 32
24. T.W. Picton, C. Alain, L. Otten, W. Ritter, and A. Achim Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 2000 111 139
25. I. Rapin, H. Schimmel, L.M. Tourk, N.A. Krasnegor, and C. Pollak Evoked responses to clicks and tones of varying intensity in waking adults Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 21 1966 335 344
26. T. Rinne, A. Degerman, and K. Alho Superior temporal and inferior frontal cortices are activated by infrequent sound duration decrements: an fMRI study NeuroImage 26 2005 66 72
27. U. Roeber, A. Widmann, and E. Schröger Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: a behavioral and event-related potential study Cogn. Brain Res. 17 2003 347 357
28. U. Roeber, S. Berti, A. Widmann, and E. Schröger Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction Cogn. Brain Res. 22 2005 451 456
29. M. Sams, P. Paavilainen, K. Alho, and R. Näätänen Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 1985 437 448
30. M. Sams, E. Kaukoranta, M. Hämäläinen, and R. Näätänen Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses Psychophysiology 28 1991 21 29
31. M. Scherg, J. Vajsar, and T.W. Picton A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1 1989 336 355
32. E. Schröger A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8 1996 527 539
33. E. Schröger, and C. Wolff Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm Cogn. Brain Res. 7 1998 71 87
34. K.C. Squires, N.K. Squires, and S.A. Hillyard Decision-related cortical potentials during an auditory signal detection task with cued observation intervals J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1 1975 268 279
35. E. Sussman, I. Winkler, and E. Schröger Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality Psychon. Bull. Rev. 10 2003 630 637
36. H. Tiitinen, K. Alho, M. Huotilainen, R.J. Ilmoniemi, J. Simola, and R. Näätänen Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity Psychophysiology 30 1993 537 540
37. N. Ulanovsky, L. Las, D. Farkas, and I. Nelken Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons J. Neurosci. 24 2004 10440 10453
38. M.W. van der Molen, and P.J. Keuss The relationship between reaction time and intensity in discrete auditory tasks Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 31 1979 95 102
39. N. Wetzel, S. Berti, A. Widmann, and E. Schröger Distraction and reorientation in children: a behavioral and ERP study NeuroReport 15 2004 1355 1358
40. D.L. Woods Auditory selective attention in middle-aged and elderly subjects: an event-related brain potential study Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 84 1992 456 468