Mutational meltdown in selfing arabidopsis lyrata

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 806-815

  Willi, Yvonne ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cost of selfing; Genetic drift; Heterosis; Inbreeding load; Plant mating system evolution; Sexual reproduction; Sporophytic self incompatibility system

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; AUTOGAMY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENETIC DRIFT; INBREEDING; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MUTATION; NEW TAXON; OUTCROSSING; PLANT COMMUNITY;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC LOAD; HETEROSIS; MUTATION; SELF FERTILIZATION;

ARABIDOPSIS; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC LOAD; HYBRID VIGOR; MUTATION; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

EID: 84874735198     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01818.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Armbruster, P., and D. H. Reed 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235-242.
2. Brown, A. H. D. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 15:1-42.
3. Busch, J. W. 2005. Inbreeding depression in self-incompatible and self-compatible populations of Leavenworthia alabamica. Heredity 94:159-165.
4. Busch, J. W. 2006. Heterosis in an isolated, effectively small, and self-fertilizing population of the flowering plant Leavenworthia alabamica. Evolution 60:184-191.
5. Busch, J. W., M. Neiman, and J. M. Koslow 2004. Evidence for maintenance of sex by pathogens in plants. Evolution 58:2584-2590.
6. Byers, D. L., and D. M. Waller 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:479-513.
7. Charlesworth, D., and S. I. Wright 2001. Breeding systems and genome evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11:685-690.
8. Charlesworth, D., M. T. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth 1993. Mutation accumulation in finite outbreeding and inbreeding populations. Genet. Res. 61:39-56.
9. Dudash, M. R. 1990. Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44:1129-1139.
10. Eckert, C. G., and S. C. H. Barrett 1994. Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae): population-genetic and experimental analyses. Evolution 48:952-964.
11. Foxe, J. P., M. Stift, A. Tedder, A. Haudry, S. I. Wright, and B. K. Mable 2010. Reconstructing origins of loss of self-incompatibility and selfing in North American Arabidopsis lyrata: a population genetic context. Evolution 64:3495-3510.
12. Gabriel, W., M. Lynch, and R. Bürger 1993. Muller's Ratchet and mutational meltdowns. Evolution 47:1744-1757.
13. Goldberg, E. E., J. R. Kohn, R. Lande, K. A. Robertson, S. A. Smith, and B. Igic 2010. Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science 330:493-495.
14. Goodwillie, C., and M. C. Knight 2006. Inbreeding depression and mixed mating in Leptosiphon jepsoniii: a comparison of three populations. Ann. Bot. 98:351-360.
15. Goodwillie, C., S. Kalisz, and C. G. Eckert 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:47-79.
16. Hartfield, M., and P. D. Keightley 2012. Current hypotheses for the evolution of sex and recombination. Integr. Zool. 7:192-209.
17. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
18. Igic, B., and J. R. Kohn 2006. The distribution of plant mating systems: study bias against obligately outcrossing species. Evolution 60:1098-1103.
19. Ingvarsson, P. K. 2002. A metapopulation perspective on genetic diversity and differentiation in partially self-fertilizing plants. Evolution 56:2368-2373.
20. Jarne, P., and J. R. Auld 2006. Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60:1816-1824.
21. Jarne, P., and D. Charlesworth 1993. The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:441-466.
22. Johnston, M. O., and D. J. Schoen 1996. Correlated evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression: an experimental study of nine populations of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 50:1478-1491.
23. Kalisz, S, D. W. Vogler, K. M. Hanley 2004. Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430:884-887.
24. Kirkpatrick, M., and P. Jarne 2000. The effects of a bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load. Am. Nat. 155:154-167.
25. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
26. Larson, G., and R. Schaetzl 2001. Origin and evolution of the Great Lakes. J. Great Lakes Res. 27:518-546.
27. Lenormand, T., and S. P. Otto 2000. The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment. Genetics 156:423-438.
28. Lloyd, D. G., and D. J. Schoen 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:358-369.
29. Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Bürger 1995a. Mutational meltdowns in sexual populations. Evolution 49:1067-1080.
30. Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Bürger 1995b. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146:489-518.
31. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The evolution of sex. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
32. Morran, L. T., M. D. Parmenter, and P. C. Phillips 2009. Mutation load and rapid adaptation favour outcrossing over self-fertilization. Nature 462:350-352.
33. Morran, L. T., O. G. Schmidt, I. A. Gelarden, R. C. Parrish, and C. M. Lively 2011. Running with the Red Queen: host-parasite coevolution selects for biparental sex. Science 333:216-218.
34. Nordborg, M. 2000. Linkage disequilibrium, gene trees and selfing: an ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization. Genetics 154:923-929.
35. Pollak, E. 1987. On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing. Genetics 117:353-360.
36. Prigoda, N. L., A. Nassuth, and B. K. Mable 2005. Phenotypic and genotypic expression of self-incompatibility haplotypes in Arabidopsis lyrata suggests unique origin of alleles in different dominance classes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1609-1620.
37. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
38. Schierup, M. H., B. K. Mable, P. Awadalla, and D. Charlesworth 2001. Identification and characterization of a polymorphic receptor kinase gene linked to the self-incompatibility locus of Arabidopsis lyrata. Genetics 158:387-399.
39. Sicard, A., and M. Lenhard 2011. The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Ann. Bot. 107:1433-1443.
40. Singer, J. D. 1998. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 24:323-355.
41. Uyenoyama, M. K. 1989. On the evolution of genetic incompatibility systems. V. Origin of sporophytic self-incompatibility in response to overdominance in viability. Theor. Popul. Biol. 36:339-365.
42. Van Buskirk, J., and Y. Willi 2006. The change in quantitative genetic variation with inbreeding. Evolution 60:2428-2434.
43. Vogler, D. W., K. Filmore, and A. G. Stephenson 1999. Inbreeding depression in Campanula rapunculoides L. I. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self-incompatibility phenotypes. J. Evol. Biol. 12:483-494.
44. Whitlock, M. C. 2000. Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection. Evolution 54:1855-1861.
45. Willi, Y. 2009. Evolution towards self-compatibility when mates are limited. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1967-1973.
46. Willi, Y., and A. A. Hoffmann 2009. Demographic factors and genetic variation influence population persistence under environmental change. J. Evol. Biol. 22:124-133.
47. Willi, Y., and K. Määttänen 2010. Evolutionary dynamics of mating system shifts in Arabidopsis lyrata. J. Evol. Biol. 23:2123-2131.
48. Willi, Y., and K. Määttänen 2011. The relative importance of factors determining genetic drift: mating system, spatial genetic structure, habitat and census size in Arabidopsis lyrata. New Phytol. 189:1200-1209.
49. Willi, Y., J. Van Buskirk, and A. A. Hoffmann 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:433-458.
50. Willi, Y., S. Dietrich, M. van Kleunen, and M. Fischer 2007a. Inter-specific competitive stress does not affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9:959-974.
51. Willi, Y., J. Van Buskirk, B. Schmid, and M. Fischer 2007b. Genetic isolation of fragmented populations is exacerbated by drift and selection. J. Evol. Biol. 20:534-542.
52. Winn, A. A., E. Elle, S. Kalisz, P. O. Cheptou, C. G. Eckert, C. Goodwillie, M. O. Johnston, D. A. Moeller, R. H. Ree, R. D. Sargent et al 2011. Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating. Evolution 65:3339-3359.