Evolutionary dynamics of mating system shifts in Arabidopsis lyrata

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2123-2131

  Willi, Y ^a,b   Maattanen K ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Brassicaceae; Outcrossing rate; Population genetic structure; Realized plant mating system; Self compatibility; Self fertilization; Self incompatibility system; Selfing; SSI

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

AUTOGAMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DICOTYLEDON; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; OUTCROSSING; PHYLOGENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE COST; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SELF FERTILIZATION;

ARABIDOPSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

ANIMALIA; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS LYRATA; BRASSICACEAE;

EID: 77956593588     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02073.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Armbruster WS, Mulder CPH, Baldwin BG, Kalisz S, Wessa B, Nute H. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in Tribe Collinsieae (Scrophulariaceae s.l.). Am. J. Bot. 2002, 89:37-49.
2. Bawa KS. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1980, 11:15-39.
3. Beck JB, Al-Shehbaz IA, Schaal BA. Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae) revisited: testing classic systematic and mating system hypotheses. Syst. Bot. 2006, 31:151-159.
4. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations 2004, Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France
5. Bohs L. Phylogeny of the Cyphomandra clade of the genus Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ITS sequence data. Taxon 2007, 56:1012-1026.
6. Busch JW, Schoen DJ. The evolution of self-incompatibility when mates are limiting. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:128-136.
7. Chen S, Matsubara K, Omori T, Kokubun H, Kodama H, Watanabe H, Hashimoto G, Marchesi E, Bullrich L, Ando T. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Petunia (Solanaceae) based on the sequence of the Hf1 gene. J. Plant. Res. 2007a, 120:385-397.
8. Chen C, Durand E, Forbes F, François O. Bayesian clustering algorithms ascertaining spatial population structure: a new computer program and a comparison study. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007b, 7:747-756.
9. Chybicki IJ, Burczyk J. Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients. J. Hered. 2009, 100:106-113.
10. Clauss MJ, Cobban H, Mitchell-Olds T. Cross-species microsatellite markers for elucidating population genetic structure in Arabidopsis and Arabis (Brassicaceae). Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:591-601.
11. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:2611-2620.
12. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP - phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 1989, 5:164-166.
13. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP - phylogeny inference package (version 3.69). 2009, http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html
14. Ferrer MM, Good-Avila SV. Macrophylogenetic analyses of the gain and loss of self-incompatibility in the Asteraceae. New Phytol. 2007, 173:401-414.
15. Goldberg EE, Igic B. On phylogenetic tests of irreversible evolution. Evolution 2008, 62:2727-2741.
16. Goldstein DB, Pollock DD. Launching microsatellites: a review of mutation processes and methods for phylogenetic inference. J. Hered. 1997, 88:335-342.
17. Goldstein DB, Ruiz Linares A, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW. Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92:6723-6727.
18. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005, 36:47-79.
19. Goodwillie C, Sargent RD, Eckert CG, Elle E, Geber MA, Johnston MO, Kalisz S, Moeller DA, Ree RH, Vallejo-Marin M, Winn AA. Correlated evolution of mating system and floral display traits in flowering plants and its implications for the distribution of mating system variation. New Phytol. 2010, 185:311-321.
20. Goudet J. FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 1995, 86:485-486.
21. Goudet J. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). 2001, http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html
22. Goudet J, Raymond M, de Meeüs T, Rousset F. Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 1996, 144:1933-1940.
23. Hoebe PN, Stift M, Tedder A, Mable BK. Multiple losses of self-incompatibility in North-American Arabidopsis lyrata?: phylogeographic context and population genetic consequences. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:4924-4939.
24. Igic B, Kohn JR. The distribution of plant mating systems: study bias against obligately outcrossing species. Evolution 2006, 60:1098-1103.
25. Igic B, Lande R, Kohn JR. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2008, 169:93-104.
26. Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1801-1806.
27. Jarne P, Auld JR. Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 2006, 60:1816-1824.
28. Johnston MO, Porcher E, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Elle E, Geber MA, Kalisz S, Kelly JK, Moeller DA, Vallejo-Marín M, Winn AA. Correlations among fertility components can maintain mixed mating in plants. Am. Nat. 2009, 173:1-11.
29. Koch M, Mummenhoff K, Hurka H. Systematics and evolutionary history of heavy metal tolerant Thlaspi caerulescens in Western Europe: evidence from genetic studies based on isozyme analysis. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1998, 26:823-838.
30. Kruszewski LJ, Galloway LF. Explaining outcrossing rate in Campanulastrum americanum (Campanulaceae): geitonogamy and cryptic self-Incompatibility. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2006, 167:455-461.
31. Latta R, Ritland K. Models for the evolution of selfing under alternative modes of inheritance. Heredity 1993, 71:1-10.
32. Mable BK. Genetic causes and consequences of the breakdown of self-incompatibility: case studies in the Brassicaceae. Genet. Res. Camb. 2008, 90:47-60.
33. Mable BK, Adam A. Patterns of genetic diversity in outcrossing and selfing populations of Arabidopsis lyrata. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:3565-3580.
34. Mable BK, Robertson AV, Dart S, Di Berardo C, Witham L. Breakdown of self-incompatibility in the perennial Arabidopsis lyrata (Brassicaceae) and its genetic consequences. Evolution 2005, 59:1437-1448.
35. Minch E, Ruíz-Linares A, Goldstein DB. Microsat (version 1.5d): a program for calculating statistics on microsatellite allele data. 1995, http://hpgl.stanford.edu/projects/microsat/
36. Muller MH, Leppälä J, Savolainen O. Genome-wide effects of postglacial colonization in Arabidopsis lyrata. Heredity 2008, 100:47-58.
37. Porcher E, Lande R. Loss of gametophytic self-incompatibility with evolution of inbreeding depression. Evolution 2005, 59:46-60.
38. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155:945-959.
39. Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP version 1.2.: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 1995, 86:248-249.
40. Ritland K. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 2002, 88:221-228.
41. SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 9.1 2002, SAS Institute, Cary, NC
42. Shimizu KK, Shimizu-Inatsugi R, Tsuchimatsu T, Purugganan MD. Independent origins of self-compatibility in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:704-714.
43. Singer JD. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 1998, 24:323-355.
44. Takayama S, Isogai A. Self-incompatibility in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56:467-489.