Inter-specific competitive stress does not affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 959-974

  Willi, Yvonne ^a,b,c   Dietrich, Stefan ^d   Van Kleunen, Mark ^d,e,f   Fischer, Markus ^d,f  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Environment dependence; Environmental stress; Inbreeding depression; Inter specific competition; Intra specific competition

Indexed keywords

AGROSTIS; AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA; RANUNCULACEAE; RANUNCULUS REPTANS;

EID: 35349015856     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Armbruster, P. and Reed, D.H. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity, 95: 235-242.
2. Badyaev, A.V. and Foresman, K.R. 2000. Extreme environmental change and evolution: stress-induced morphological variation is strongly concordant with patterns of evolutionary divergence in shrew mandibles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 267: 371-377.
3. Berg, H. and Redbo-Torstensson, P. 1999. Offspring performance in three cleistogamous Viola species. Plant Ecol., 145: 49-58.
4. Berg, H. and Redbo-Torstensson, P. 2000. Offspring performance in Oxalis acetosella, a cleistogamous perennial herb. Plant Biol., 2: 638-645.
5. Bijlsma, R., Bundgaard, J. and Van Putten, W.F. 1999. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol., 12: 1125-1137.
6. Carr, D.E. and Dudash, M.R. 1995. Inbreeding depression under a competitive regime in Mimulus guttatus: consequences for potential male and female function. Heredity, 75: 437-445.
7. Cheptou, P.-O. and Schoen, D.J. 2003. Frequency-dependent inbreeding depression in Amsinckia. Am. Nat., 162: 744-753.
8. Cheptou, P.-O., Imbert, E., Lepart, J. and Escarré, J. 2000. Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). J. Evol. Biol., 13: 522-531.
9. Cheptou, P.-O., Lepart, J. and Escarré, J. 2001. Inbreeding depression under intraspecific competition in a highly outcrossing population of Crepis sancta (Asteraceae): evidence for frequency-dependent variation. Am. J. Bot., 88: 1424-1429.
10. Christen, M., Kurtz, J. and Milinski, M. 2002. Outcrossing increases infection success and competitive ability: experimental evidence from a hermaphrodite parasite. Evolution, 56: 2243-2251.
11. Crnokrak, P. and Barrett, S.C.H. 2002. Perspective: Purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution, 56: 2347-2358.
12. Crnokrak, P. and Roff, D.A. 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity, 83: 260-270.
13. Daehler, C.C. 1999. Inbreeding depression in smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora, Poaceae) invading San Francisco Bay. Am. J. Bot., 86: 131-139.
14. Delph, L.F. and Lloyd, D.G. 1996. Inbreeding depression in the gynodioecious shrub Hebe subalpina (Scrophulariaceae). NZ J. Bot., 34: 241-247.
15. Eckert, C.G. and Barrett, S.C.H. 1994. Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae): population-genetic and experimental analyses. Evolution, 48: 952-964.
16. Fischer, M., van Kleunen, M. and Schmid, B. 2000. Genetic Allee effects on performance, plasticity and developmental stability in a clonal plant. Ecol. Lett., 3: 530-539.
17. Fowler, K. and Whitlock, M.C. 2001. Environmental stress, inbreeding, and the nature of phenotypic and genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269: 677-683.
18. Galeuchet, D.J., Perret, C. and Fischer, M. 2005. Performance of Lychnis flos-cuculi from fragmented populations under experimental biotic interactions. Ecology, 86: 1002-1011.
19. Gallardo, J.A. and Neira, R. 2005. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression in cultured Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): aggressiveness, dominance and intraspecific competition. Heredity, 95: 449-456.
20. Gilligan, D.M., Woodworth, L.M., Montgomery, M.E., Briscoe, D.A. and Frankham, R. 1997. Is mutation accumulation a threat to the survival of endangered populations? Conserv. Biol., 11: 1235-1241.
21. Goodwillie, C. 2000. Inbreeding depression and mating systems in two species of Linanthus (Polemoniaceae). Heredity, 84: 283-293.
22. Gurevitch, J., Taub, D.R., Morton, T.C., Gomez, P.L. and Wang, I.-N. 1996. Competition and genetic background in a rapid-cycling cultivar of Brassica rapa (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot., 83: 932-938.
23. Haag, C.R., Hottinger, J.W., Riek, M. and Ebert, D. 2002. Strong inbreeding depression in a Daphnia metapopulation. Evolution, 56: 518-526.
24. Keller, L.F. and Waller, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17: 230-241.
25. Keller, L.F., Grant, P.R., Grant, B.R. and Petren, K. 2002. Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches. Evolution, 56: 1229-1239.
26. Kéry, M., Matthies, D. and Spillmann, H.-H. 2000. Reduced fecundity and offspring performance in small populations of the declining grassland plants Primula veris and Gentiana lutea. J. Ecol., 88: 17-30.
27. Koehn, R.K. and Bayne, B.L. 1989. Towards a physiological and genetical understanding of the energetics of the stress response. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 37: 157-171.
28. Koelewijn, H.P. 2004. Sibling competition, size variation and frequency-dependent outcrossing advantage in Plantago coronopus. Evol. Ecol., 18: 51-74.
29. Kristensen, T.N. and Sørensen, A.C. 2005. Inbreeding - lessons from animal breeding, evolutionary biology and conservation genetics. Anim. Sci., 80: 121-133.
30. Kristensen, T.N., Dahlgaard, J. and Loeschcke, V. 2002. Inbreeding affects Hsp70 expression in two species of Drosophila even at benign temperatures. Evol. Ecol. Res., 4: 1209-1216.
31. Kristensen, T.N., Sorensen, P., Pedersen, K.S., Kruhoffer, M. and Loeschke, V. 2006. Inbreeding by environmental interactions affect gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 173: 1329-1336.
32. Latter, B.D.H. and Mulley, J.C. 1995. Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 139: 255-266.
33. Lhamo, N., Ramsey, M. and Vaughton, G. 2006. Density- and frequency-dependent inbreeding depression in the Australian annual Hibiscus trionum var. vesicarius. Evol. Ecol. Res., 8: 717-730.
34. Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
35. Marr, A.B., Arcese, P., Hochachka, W.M., Reid, J.M. and Keller, L.F. 2006. Interactive effects of environmental stress and inbreeding on reproductive traits in a wild bird population. J. Anim. Ecol., 75: 1406-1415.
36. Meagher, S., Penn, D.J. and Potts, W.K. 2000. Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 3324-3329.
37. Pluess, A.R. and Stöcklin, J. 2004. Genetic diversity and fitness in Scabiosa columbaria in the Swiss Jura in relation to population size. Conserv. Genet., 5: 145-156.
38. Pujol, B. and McKey, D. 2006. Size asymmetry in intraspecific competition and the density-dependence of inbreeding depression in a natural plant population: a case study in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz, Euphorbiaceae). J. Evol. Biol., 19: 85-96.
39. Rowe, G. and Beebee, T.J.C. 2005. Intraspecific competition disadvantages inbred natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) genotypes over outbred ones in a shared pond environment. J. Anim. Ecol., 74: 71-76.
40. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
41. SAS Institute. 2006. The GLIMMIX Procedure. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
42. Schmid, B. and Dolt, C. 1994. Effects of maternal and paternal environment and genotype on offspring phenotype in Solidago altissima L. Evolution, 48: 1525-1549.
43. Schmitt, J. and Ehrhardt, D.W. 1990. Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution, 44: 269-278.
44. Singer, J.D. 1998. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Educ. Behav. Stat., 24: 323-355.
45. Sorensen, J.G., Kristensen, T.N. and Loeschke, V. 2003. The evolutionary and ecological role of heat shock proteins. Ecol. Lett., 6: 1025-1037.
46. Stearns, S.C., Kaiser, M. and Kawecki, T.J. 1995. The differential genetic and environmental canalization of fitness components in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol., 8: 539-557.
47. van Treuren, R., Bijlsma, R., Ouborg, N.J. and van Delden, W. 1993. The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. IV Inbreeding depression and heterosis effects caused by selfing and outcrossing in Scabiosa columbaria. Evolution, 47: 1669-1680.
48. Waller, D.M. 1984. Differences in fitness between seedlings derived from cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers in Impatiens capensis. Evolution, 38: 427-440.
49. Willi, Y. and Fischer, M. 2005. Genetic rescue in interconnected populations of small and large size of the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Heredity, 95: 437-443.
50. Willi, Y., Van Buskirk, J. and Fischer, M. 2005. A threefold genetic Allee effect: population size affects cross-compatibility, inbreeding depression and drift load in the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Genetics, 169: 2255-2265.
51. Willi, Y., Van Buskirk, J. and Hoffmann, A.A. 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 37: 433-458.
52. Willi, Y., van Kleunen, M., Dietrich, S. and Fischer, M. 2007. Genetic rescue persists beyond first-generation outbreeding in small populations of a rare plant. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 274: 2357-2364.
53. Wolfe, L.M. 1993. Inbreeding depression in Hydrophyllum appendiculatum: role of maternal effects, crowding, and parental mating history. Evolution, 47: 374-386.